Level-dependent changes in detection of temporal gaps in noise markers by adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Compression in the basilar-membrane input-output response flattens the temporal envelope of a fluctuating signal when more gain is applied to lower level than higher level temporal components. As a result, level-dependent changes in gap detection for signals with different depths of envelope fluctuation and for subjects with normal and impaired hearing may reveal effects of compression. To test these assumptions, gap detection with and without a broadband noise was measured with 1, 000-Hz-wide (flatter) and 50-Hz-wide (fluctuating) noise markers as a function of marker level. As marker level increased, background level also increased, maintaining a fixed acoustic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to minimize sensation-level effects on gap detection. Significant level-dependent changes in gap detection were observed, consistent with effects of cochlear compression. For the flatter marker, gap detection that declines with increases in level up to mid levels and improves with further increases in level may be explained by an effective flattening of the temporal envelope at mid levels, where compression effects are expected to be strongest. A flatter effective temporal envelope corresponds to a reduced effective SNR. The effects of a reduction in compression (resulting in larger effective SNRs) may contribute to better-than-normal gap detection observed for some hearing-impaired listeners.

[1]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A variant temporal-masking-curve method for inferring peripheral auditory compression. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Cochlear nonlinearity between 500 and 8000 Hz in listeners with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  B C Moore,et al.  Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow bands of noise , 2001, British journal of audiology.

[4]  D A Nelson,et al.  A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  B. Moore,et al.  Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B. Moore,et al.  Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  B. Moore,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions for band-limited noise in subjects with cochlear hearing loss. , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[9]  A. Oxenham,et al.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Louis D Braida,et al.  Review Article: Review of the Literature on Temporal Resolution in Listeners With Cochlear Hearing Impairment: A Critical Assessment of the Role of Suprathreshold Deficits , 2009, Trends in amplification.

[11]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Effects of envelope fluctuations on gap detection , 1992, Hearing Research.

[12]  Y. Sininger,et al.  Asymmetry of Temporal Processing in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Unilaterally Deaf Subjects , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[13]  Gap detection in modulated noise: across-frequency facilitation and interference. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Vit Drga,et al.  Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Effect of loudness recruitment on the perception of amplitude modulation , 1996 .

[17]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  B. Moore,et al.  Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[19]  S Buus,et al.  Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  P J Fitzgibbons Temporal gap resolution in masked normal ears as a function of masker level. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  S. Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  The relation between gap detection, loudness, and loudness growth in noise-masked normal-hearing listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Ifat Yasin,et al.  The effects of a high-frequency suppressor on tuning curves and derived basilar-membrane response functions. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.