Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA

In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of chemically damaged and highly fragmented DNA molecules. In particular, the enzymatic reactions and DNA purification steps during library preparation can result in DNA template loss and sequencing biases, affecting downstream analyses. The development of library preparation methods that circumvent these obstacles and enable higher throughput are therefore of interest to researchers working with degraded DNA. In this study, we compare four Illumina library preparation protocols, including two “single-tube” methods developed for this study with the explicit aim of improving data quality and reducing preparation time and expenses. The methods are tested on grey wolf (Canis lupus) museum specimens. We found single-tube protocols increase library complexity, yield more reads that map uniquely to the reference genome, reduce processing time, and may decrease laboratory costs by 90%. Given the advantages of single-tube library preparations, we anticipate these methods will be of considerable interest to the growing field of paleogenomics and other applications investigating degraded DNA.

[1]  Adrian W. Briggs,et al.  Road blocks on paleogenomes—polymerase extension profiling reveals the frequency of blocking lesions in ancient DNA , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .

[3]  Anders F. Andersson,et al.  Titration-free 454 sequencing using Y adapters , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[4]  T. Fennell,et al.  Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries , 2011, Genome Biology.

[5]  Cristina E. Valdiosera,et al.  Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultrashort DNA fragments , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  L. Orlando,et al.  Comparing the performance of three ancient DNA extraction methods for high‐throughput sequencing , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[7]  Aurélien Ginolhac,et al.  Characterization of ancient and modern genomes by SNP detection and phylogenomic and metagenomic analysis using PALEOMIX , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[8]  Johanna L A Paijmans,et al.  Analysis of Whole Mitogenomes from Ancient Samples. , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.

[9]  Johnf . Thompson,et al.  Improving the performance of true single molecule sequencing for ancient DNA , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[10]  L. Orlando,et al.  New insights on single-stranded versus double-stranded DNA library preparation for ancient DNA. , 2015, BioTechniques.

[11]  D. Reich,et al.  Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture , 2012, Genome research.

[12]  M. Meyer,et al.  Single-stranded DNA library preparation for the sequencing of ancient or damaged DNA , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[13]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Improving access to endogenous DNA in ancient bones and teeth , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[14]  M. Thomas P. Gilbert,et al.  mapDamage: testing for damage patterns in ancient DNA sequences , 2011, Bioinform..

[15]  Matthias Meyer,et al.  Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[16]  C. Thermes,et al.  Library preparation methods for next-generation sequencing: tone down the bias. , 2014, Experimental cell research.

[17]  Jean-David Grattepanche,et al.  Microplanktonic Community Structure in a Coastal System Relative to a Phaeocystis Bloom Inferred from Morphological and Tag Pyrosequencing Methods , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  P. Vallone,et al.  Predicting sequence-dependent melting stability of short duplex DNA oligomers. , 1997, Biopolymers.

[19]  M. Hofreiter,et al.  A Paleogenomic Perspective on Evolution and Gene Function: New Insights from Ancient DNA , 2014, Science.

[20]  K. Czene,et al.  Library Preparation and Multiplex Capture for Massive Parallel Sequencing Applications Made Efficient and Easy , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  Philip L. F. Johnson,et al.  mapDamage2.0: fast approximate Bayesian estimates of ancient DNA damage parameters , 2013, Bioinform..

[22]  Nancy F. Hansen,et al.  Accurate Whole Human Genome Sequencing using Reversible Terminator Chemistry , 2008, Nature.

[23]  Jesse Dabney,et al.  Ancient DNA damage. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[24]  Michael Hofreiter,et al.  Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[25]  Janet Kelso,et al.  Nuclear DNA sequences from the Middle Pleistocene Sima de los Huesos hominins , 2016, Nature.

[26]  M. Meyer,et al.  Single-stranded DNA library preparation from highly degraded DNA using T4 DNA ligase , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  S. Pääbo,et al.  Optimization of 454 sequencing library preparation from small amounts of DNA permits sequence determination of both DNA strands. , 2009, BioTechniques.

[28]  L. Orlando,et al.  Reconstructing ancient genomes and epigenomes , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[29]  S. Pääbo,et al.  Molecular breeding of polymerases for amplification of ancient DNA , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  Jesse Dabney,et al.  Length and GC-biases during sequencing library amplification: a comparison of various polymerase-buffer systems with ancient and modern DNA sequencing libraries. , 2012, BioTechniques.

[31]  James R. Knight,et al.  Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors , 2005, Nature.

[32]  B. Kemp,et al.  How Much DNA is Lost? Measuring DNA Loss of Short-Tandem-Repeat Length Fragments Targeted by the PowerPlex 16® System Using the Qiagen MinElute Purification Kit , 2015, Human biology.

[33]  E. A. Bennett,et al.  Library construction for ancient genomics: single strand or double strand? , 2014, BioTechniques.

[34]  Michael A Quail,et al.  Optimal enzymes for amplifying sequencing libraries , 2011, Nature Methods.

[35]  M. Jakobsson,et al.  Separating endogenous ancient DNA from modern day contamination in a Siberian Neandertal , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Timothy Daley,et al.  Predicting the molecular complexity of sequencing libraries , 2013, Nature Methods.

[37]  B. Kemp,et al.  How Much DNA is Lost? Measuring DNA Loss of STR Length Fragments Targeted by the PowerPlex 16® System Using the Qiagen MinElute Purification Kit , 2014 .

[38]  Adrian W. Briggs,et al.  Removal of deaminated cytosines and detection of in vivo methylation in ancient DNA , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  U. Stenzel,et al.  Parallel tagged sequencing on the 454 platform , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[40]  Adrian W. Briggs,et al.  A High-Coverage Genome Sequence from an Archaic Denisovan Individual , 2012, Science.

[41]  R. Kucera,et al.  DNA‐Dependent DNA Polymerases , 2008, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[42]  M. Beaumont,et al.  Novel high-resolution characterization of ancient DNA reveals C > U-type base modification events as the sole cause of post mortem miscoding lesions , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  M. Meyer,et al.  Selective enrichment of damaged DNA molecules for ancient genome sequencing , 2014, Genome research.

[44]  Stinus Lindgreen,et al.  AdapterRemoval v2: rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging , 2016, BMC Research Notes.

[45]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Ligation Bias in Illumina Next-Generation DNA Libraries: Implications for Sequencing Ancient Genomes , 2013, PloS one.

[46]  Alexander F. Auch,et al.  Metagenomics to Paleogenomics: Large-Scale Sequencing of Mammoth DNA , 2006, Science.

[47]  Adrian W. Briggs,et al.  Preparation of next-generation sequencing libraries from damaged DNA. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[48]  Søren Brunak,et al.  Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia , 2015, Nature.

[49]  Philip L. F. Johnson,et al.  Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  S. Benkovic,et al.  Replication clamps and clamp loaders. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[51]  B. Shapiro Engineered polymerases amplify the potential of ancient DNA. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[52]  F. van Nieuwerburgh,et al.  Library construction for next-generation sequencing: overviews and challenges. , 2014, BioTechniques.