Efficacy measures associated to a plantar pressure based classification system in diabetic foot medicine.

AIMS The concept of 'classification' has, similar to many other diseases, been found to be fundamental in the field of diabetic medicine. In the current study, we aimed at determining efficacy measures of a recently published plantar pressure based classification system. METHODS Technical efficacy of the classification system was investigated by applying a high resolution, pixel-level analysis on the normalized plantar pressure pedobarographic fields of the original experimental dataset consisting of 97 patients with diabetes and 33 persons without diabetes. Clinical efficacy was assessed by considering the occurence of foot ulcers at the plantar aspect of the forefoot in this dataset. Classification efficacy was assessed by determining the classification recognition rate as well as its sensitivity and specificity using cross-validation subsets of the experimental dataset together with a novel cohort of 12 patients with diabetes. RESULTS Pixel-level comparison of the four groups associated to the classification system highlighted distinct regional differences. Retrospective analysis showed the occurence of eleven foot ulcers in the experimental dataset since their gait analysis. Eight out of the eleven ulcers developed in a region of the foot which had the highest forces. Overall classification recognition rate exceeded 90% for all cross-validation subsets. Sensitivity and specificity of the four groups associated to the classification system exceeded respectively the 0.7 and 0.8 level in all cross-validation subsets. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study support the use of the novel plantar pressure based classification system in diabetic foot medicine. It may particularly serve in communication, diagnosis and clinical decision making.

[1]  W. Jeffcoate,et al.  Validation of a system of foot ulcer classification in diabetes mellitus , 2004, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[2]  Todd C Pataky,et al.  Pedobarographic statistical parametric mapping (pSPM): a pixel-level approach to foot pressure image analysis. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Joseph L. Mills,et al.  Comprehensive fool examination and risk assessment: A report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American diabetes association, with endorsement by the American association of clinical endocrinologists , 2008 .

[4]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  A New Classification of Diabetic Gait Pattern Based on Cluster Analysis of Biomechanical Data , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[5]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[6]  A. Karthikesalingam,et al.  A systematic review of scoring systems for diabetic foot ulcers , 2010, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[7]  J. McGarry Banting lecture 2001: dysregulation of fatty acid metabolism in the etiology of type 2 diabetes. , 2002, Diabetes.

[8]  Claudia Giacomozzi,et al.  Peak pressure curve: an effective parameter for early detection of foot functional impairments in diabetic patients. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[9]  H. Bruyninckx,et al.  Classification of Forefoot Plantar Pressure Distribution in Persons with Diabetes: A Novel Perspective for the Mechanical Management of Diabetic Foot? , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  L. Lavery,et al.  Effectiveness of the diabetic foot risk classification system of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[11]  Georgeanne Botek,et al.  Treatment for diabetic foot ulcers , 2005, The Lancet.

[12]  J. Y. Goulermas,et al.  New insights into the plantar pressure correlates of walking speed using pedobarographic statistical parametric mapping (pSPM). , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Sicco A. Bus,et al.  Effect of Custom-Made Footwear on Foot Ulcer Recurrence in Diabetes , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[14]  V. van Casteren,et al.  Implementation of a quality improvement initiative in Belgian diabetic foot clinics: feasibility and initial results , 2014, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[15]  Michael J. Mueller,et al.  Comprehensive Foot Examination and Risk Assessment , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[16]  J. Duysens,et al.  A new method to normalize plantar pressure measurements for foot size and foot progression angle. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  Christian Maiwald,et al.  Spatiotemporal volumetric analysis of dynamic plantar pressure data. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  S. Yale,et al.  Reliability and Feasibility of Methods to Quantitatively Assess Peripheral Edema , 2009, Clinical Medicine & Research.

[20]  Sicco A Bus,et al.  Risk Factors for Plantar Foot Ulcer Recurrence in Neuropathic Diabetic Patients , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[21]  N. Schaper,et al.  Diabetic foot ulcer classification system for research purposes: a progress report on criteria for including patients in research studies , 2004, Diabetes/Metabolism Research Reviews.

[22]  J. Shaw,et al.  IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. , 2011, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[23]  Dennis G. Fryback,et al.  The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[24]  Bijan Najafi,et al.  Diabetic Foot Biomechanics and Gait Dysfunction , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[25]  Michael Brownlee,et al.  The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanism. , 2005, Diabetes.

[26]  Ahmet Erdemir,et al.  Clustering and classification of regional peak plantar pressures of diabetic feet. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.