Examining 3-D Technologies in Laptop Displays

As 3-D content migrates to the laptop, it is important to understand if customers can perceive quality differences between the 3-D technologies and to know if they feel any discomfort with close-up viewing of 3-D displays. In this study, we compared the quality and viewing comfort of active, passive, and autostereoscopic (glasses-free) 3-D displays. We found that participants were able to discern differences in 3-D quality and comfort on laptop computer displays in realistic viewing conditions within a short period. Although the active and passive displays were comparable, the autostereoscopic display was rated lower in quality and viewing comfort.

[1]  Philip J. Corriveau,et al.  Stereoscopic Viewing and Reported Perceived Immersion and Symptoms , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  Mtm Marc Lambooij,et al.  Visual Discomfort and Visual Fatigue of Stereoscopic Displays: A Review , 2009 .

[3]  David M. Hoffman,et al.  The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[4]  Peter A Howarth,et al.  Potential hazards of viewing 3‐D stereoscopic television, cinema and computer games: a review , 2011, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[5]  Marcel P. Lucassen,et al.  Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.