A positive complement dependent cytotoxicity immunoglobulin G crossmatch due to auto-antibodies with a negative luminex bead assays in a renal transplant recipient: A Diagnostic dilemma

Transplant recipients are always at a risk of developing anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies due to prior sensitizing events such as blood transfusions, multiple pregnancies, or transplantation. Unexpected positive outcomes can be seen in complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) based assays due to underlying autoimmune disorders or pharmacological treatment (rituximab/intravenous immunoglobulin/anti-thymocyte globulin administration), therefore, limiting its value. CDC based assay results strongly depend on the vitality of the donor lymphocytes, highlighting another major limitation of this assay. Thus, as an alternative approach, solid phase based crossmatch assays were introduced which function independently of the cell quality and have higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting anti-HLA antibodies. We describe a case where the patient awaiting renal transplantation from living related donor was evaluated by pretransplant histocompatibility testing for the detection of anti-HLA antibodies. The histocompatibility testing revealed positive CDC anti-human globulin and flow crossmatch along with negative Luminex based assays (HLA antibody screen, luminex crossmatch, and luminex single bead assay). Detailed histocompatibility workup revealed immunoglobulin G autoantibodies which were complement activating and lympocytoxic in nature.

[1]  M-J Apithy,et al.  False Positive B-Cells Crossmatch after Prior Rituximab Exposure of the Kidney Donor , 2016, Case reports in transplantation.

[2]  A. Valson,et al.  Nonspecific positivity on the Luminex crossmatch assay for anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies due to antibodies directed against the antibody coated beads , 2016, Indian journal of nephrology.

[3]  Emile de Heer,et al.  Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Presence of MICA-DSA and Successful Renal Re-Transplant with Negative-MICA Virtual Crossmatch , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  H. Al Mana,et al.  Outcome of desensitization in human leukocyte antigen- and ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation: a single-center experience in more than 100 patients. , 2013, Transplantation proceedings.

[5]  Robert G. Nagele,et al.  Natural IgG Autoantibodies Are Abundant and Ubiquitous in Human Sera, and Their Number Is Influenced By Age, Gender, and Disease , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  B. Pollok-Kopp,et al.  Artificially Positive Crossmatches Not Leading to the Refusal of Kidney Donations due to the Usage of Adequate Diagnostic Tools , 2013, Case reports in transplantation.

[7]  A. Ender,et al.  HLA Antibody Specification Using Single-Antigen Beads—A Technical Solution for the Prozone Effect , 2011, Transplantation.

[8]  N. Banner,et al.  C4d Fixing, Luminex Binding Antibodies—A New Tool for Prediction of Graft Failure After Heart Transplantation , 2007, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[9]  M. Klinger,et al.  Blood group Lewis alloantibodies cause antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients. , 2007, Transplantation proceedings.

[10]  G. Opelz,et al.  Role of anti-IgG autoantibodies in kidney transplantation. , 1990, Immunology letters.

[11]  J. Gratama,et al.  THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE LEWIS BLOOD GROUP SYSTEM AND HLA‐MATCHING IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION , 1988, Transplantation.

[12]  M. Wick,et al.  The role of the Lewis antigen system in renal transplantation and allograft rejection. , 1984, Mayo Clinic proceedings.