Effect of load position on physiological and perceptual responses during load carriage with an internal frame backpack

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of load position in an internal frame backpack on physiological and perceptual variables. Ten female participants walked on a level treadmill for 10 min carrying 25% of their body weight in a high, central, or low position. The variables measured included oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), respiratory exchange ratio (R), respiratory rate (RR), minute ventilation (VE), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). VO2, VE, and RPE were significantly lower in the high position (18.6 ± 2.3 ml/kg/min, 31.7 ± 5.0 l/min, 2.8 ± 0.8, respectively) compared to the low position (22.2 ± 3.0 ml/kg/min, 38.6 ± 7.5 l/min, 3.7 ± 1.0, respectively). HR, R, and RR did not change significantly as the load was moved from the high (129.8 ± 16.8, 0.89 ± 0.06, 30.3 ± 4.2, respectively) to the low position (136.0 ± 25.3, 0.92 ± 0.04, 33.8 ± 5.2, respectively). The results of this study suggest that load placement is an important factor in the physiological and perceptual responses to load carriage, and that packing heavy items high in the backpack may be the most energy efficient method of carrying a load on the back.

[1]  J. Knapik,et al.  Symptoms during Load Carrying: Effects of Mass and Load Distribution during a 20-Km Road March , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  S. Legg,et al.  Energy cost of backpacking in heavy boots. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[3]  G. Borg.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  Peter N. Frykman,et al.  The Relationship Of Backpack Center Of Mass Location To The Metabolic Cost Of Load Carriage 1170 , 1997 .

[5]  S. Simon,et al.  Biomechanical and metabolic effects of varying backpack loading on simulated marching , 2000, Ergonomics.

[6]  B. Jacobson,et al.  Comparison of Selected Perceptual Variables for Backpacks with Internal and External Frames , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  S. Legg,et al.  Subjective perceptual methods for comparing backpacks. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[8]  W. Johnson,et al.  Soldier performance and strenuous road marching: influence of load mass and load distribution. , 1997, Military medicine.

[9]  A. P. Hollander,et al.  Influence of heavy weight carrying on the cardiorespiratory system during exercise , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[10]  R Lloyd,et al.  The oxygen consumption associated with unloaded walking and load carriage using two different backpack designs. , 2000, European journal of applied physiology.

[11]  S. R. Datta,et al.  Ergonomic comparison of seven modes of carrying loads on the horizontal plane. , 1971, Ergonomics.

[12]  R. Norman,et al.  Effects of load placement on back muscle activity in load carriage , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[13]  S J Legg.  Comparison of different methods of load carriage. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[14]  K. Reynolds,et al.  Physiological responses to prolonged treadmill walking with external loads , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  D. J. Knowles,et al.  The metabolic cost of backpack and shoulder load carriage. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[16]  J Kirk,et al.  Physiological and perceptual responses to load-carrying in female subjects using internal and external frame backpacks. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[17]  M F Haisman,et al.  Determinants of load carrying ability. , 1988, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  I. Peterson.  Packing It In , 1987 .

[19]  S J Legg,et al.  Comparison of five modes of carrying a load close to the trunk. , 1985, Ergonomics.