Polynomial innovation diffusion models

Abstract In an earlier paper [42] the authors presented a comprehensive evaluation and extensions of available causal models of “binomial type” for describing the time pattern of the innovation diffusion processes. The binomial models are based on the assumption that the entire population can be divided into two groups—adopters of an innovation and the potential adopters—such that eventually everyone adopts the innovation and an innovation once adopted is never rejected. However, many examples can be cited where this assumption is unrealistic. Therefore this paper presents some polynomial innovation diffusion models that are less restrictive compared with the binomial models. The paper also shows the link between the polynomial diffusion process and the multilevel technological substitution process.

[1]  M. Nawaz Sharif,et al.  System dynamics modeling for forecasting multilevel technological substitution , 1976 .

[2]  Brian Robson,et al.  Urban Growth: An Approach , 1974 .

[3]  Anthony F. Bartholomay,et al.  The Mathematical Approach to Biology and Medicine , 1967 .

[4]  N. Bailey The mathematical theory of epidemics , 1957 .

[5]  A.Wade Blackman,et al.  Forecasting through dynamic modeling , 1971 .

[6]  A.Wade Blackman,et al.  A mathematical model for trend forecasts , 1971 .

[7]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Integrating time and space in technological substitution models , 1979 .

[8]  P M Boffey AAAS Meeting: Drought Was the Topic of the Week. , 1977, Science.

[9]  F. Bass A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[10]  Kenneth D. Mackenzie,et al.  Some Problems in using Diffusion Models for New Products , 1972 .

[11]  A.Wade Blackman The use of dynamic modeling for conditional forecasts of resource allocation policies , 1974 .

[12]  H. Davis Introduction to Nonlinear Differential and Integral Equations , 1964 .

[13]  L. Fourt,et al.  Early Prediction of Market Success for New Grocery Products , 1960 .

[14]  M. Sharif,et al.  Determinants for forecasting technological substitution , 1979 .

[15]  Y. Cohen Diffusion of an Innovation in an Urban System: The Spread of Planned Regional Shopping Centers in the United States, 1949-1968 , 1972 .

[16]  R. Lippitt,et al.  The dynamics of planned change , 1958 .

[17]  Stuart C. Dodd,et al.  Testing Message Diffusion in Controlled Experiments: Charting the Distance and Time Factors in the Interactance Hypothesis , 1953 .

[18]  J. Forrester Principles of systems : text and workbook, chapters 1 through 10 , 1968 .

[19]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  First-purchase diffusion models of new-product acceptance , 1979 .

[20]  P M Boffey Nuclear energy: do States lack power to block proliferation of reactors? , 1976, Science.

[21]  J. Coleman Introduction to Mathematical Sociology , 1965 .

[22]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Stochastic Models for Social Processes , 1967 .

[23]  P. Pedersen Urban-Regional Development in South America: A Process of Diffusion and Integration , 1975 .

[24]  E. Mansfield TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[25]  David G Kendall,et al.  Deterministic and Stochastic Epidemics in Closed Populations , 1956 .

[26]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Generalized model for the time pattern of the diffusion process , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[27]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Innovation diffusion: A deterministic model of space-time integration with physical analog☆ , 1977 .

[28]  J. R. Mueller,et al.  Form and origin of the parry arcs. , 1977, Science.

[29]  総務省統計局,et al.  Statistical handbook of Japan , 1958 .

[30]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Advanced Methods for the Solution of Differential Equations. , 1973 .

[31]  M. Webber,et al.  The impact of uncertainty on location , 1973 .

[32]  M. N. Sharif,et al.  Binomial innovation diffusion models with dynamic potential adopter population , 1981 .