Quality of radiosurgery for single brain metastases with respect to treatment technology: a matched-pair analysis

Objective A comparison of treatment parameters and quality of clinical outcome in patients with single brain metastases treated with two different technologies for radiosurgery (Gamma Knife and CyberKnife). Methods Treatment parameters were statistically analyzed. Clinical outcome was assessed by matched-pair analysis based on the treatment device, differences in dose prescription, and the date of the treatment. Patients were matched according to their tumor size, age, gender, primary cancer, and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group score. Survival post-radiosurgery, local and distant tumor control, and complications were analyzed. Predictive factors were investigated. Results 423 single brain metastases were treated with Gamma Knife and 73 with CyberKnife. Tumor volumes were similar. The parameters minimum tumor dose, maximum tumor dose, prescription isodose volume, conformality index, homogeneity index, volume of tissue receiving a dose of 10 Gy or more were significantly larger in Gamma Knife group. Sixty-three patients were good matches. These showed the same pattern in parameters. Concerning the outcome analysis, only overall survival differed significantly between groups, twice as long with CyberKnife (P < 0.03). According to pooled data, dose was predictive of local failure, whole brain radiation therapy and chemotherapy were predictive of toxicity, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group score was predictive of survival after radiosurgery, and date of treatment was predictive of overall survival. No factor predicted new brain metastases, including whole brain radiation therapy. Conclusions The most important result of this study was the finding that the obvious differences in treatment-related parameters between Gamma Knife and CyberKnife had no impact on the quality of the clinical outcome after radiosurgery. Survival time increased chronologically, presumably due to an intensified anti-cancer therapy in the more recent era of the CyberKnife treatments.

[1]  E. Touboul,et al.  Radiosurgery with or without A 2-mm margin for 93 single brain metastases. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  G. Barnett,et al.  Analysis of prognostic factors for patients with single brain metastasis treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1997, Radiation oncology investigations.

[3]  J. Tonn,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases from breast carcinoma , 2004, Cancer.

[4]  J. Adler,et al.  An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study of the Accuracy of CyberKnife Spinal Radiosurgery , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[5]  William Main,et al.  An Analysis of the Accuracy of the CyberKnife: A Robotic Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgical System , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[6]  Z. Petrovich,et al.  Dosimetric Comparison of CyberKnife with Other Radiosurgical Modalities for an Ellipsoidal Target , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[7]  G A Horstmann,et al.  Surgery and radiotherapy compared with gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of solitary cerebral metastases of small diameter. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  L Souhami,et al.  Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  D. Mcrae,et al.  CyberKnife® radiosurgery in the treatment of complex skull base tumors: analysis of treatment planning parameters , 2006, Radiation Oncology (London, England).

[10]  M J Murphy,et al.  The Cyberknife: a frameless robotic system for radiosurgery. , 1997, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[11]  M. Mehta,et al.  A multiinstitutional outcome and prognostic factor analysis of radiosurgery for resectable single brain metastasis. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  John Y. K. Lee,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastasis. , 2007, Neurosurgical focus.

[13]  Steven D Chang,et al.  A STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF CYBERKNIFE SPINAL RADIOSURGERY USING SKELETAL STRUCTURE TRACKING , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[14]  O. Pastyr,et al.  Stereotactic percutaneous single dose irradiation of brain metastases with a linear accelerator. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Hans-Jakob Steiger,et al.  Microsurgery plus whole brain irradiation versus Gamma Knife surgery alone for treatment of single metastases to the brain: a randomized controlled multicentre phase III trial , 2008, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[16]  Hiroki Shirato,et al.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy vs Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone for Treatment of Brain Metastases: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007 .

[17]  J. Tonn,et al.  Safety and efficacy of outpatient gamma knife radiosurgery for multiple cerebral metastases , 2004, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[18]  The gamma knife. , 1988, JAMA.

[19]  Focussed Gamma Radiation , 1993 .

[20]  K. Yamanaka.  Prognostic factors for brain metastasis from lung cancer after gamma knife radiosurgery. , 1999, Osaka city medical journal.

[21]  R P Müller,et al.  On isocentre adjustment and quality control in linear accelerator based radiosurgery with circular collimators and room lasers. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  R. Müller,et al.  Risk analysis of linear accelerator radiosurgery. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  J. Leith,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of human tumors relevant to radiosurgery: comparative cellular radiosensitivity and hypoxic percentages. , 1994, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[24]  A. Muacevic,et al.  Repeated gamma knife surgery for multiple brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[25]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Potential human error in setting stereotactic coordinates for radiosurgery: implications for quality assurance. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  A. Muacevic,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery without radiation therapy providing high local tumor control of multiple brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. , 2004, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[27]  FOCUSSED GAMMA RADIATION The Gamma Knife , 1993 .

[28]  L. Leksell.  The stereotaxic method and radiosurgery of the brain. , 1951, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica.

[29]  V. Smith,et al.  Peripheral doses in CyberKnife radiosurgery. , 2006, Medical physics.

[30]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Treatment planning for gamma knife radiosurgery with multiple isocenters. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  Steven D Chang,et al.  An Analysis of the Accuracy of the CyberKnife: A Robotic Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgical System , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[32]  M. Phillips.  Physical Aspects of Stereotactic Radiosurgery , 1997, Springer US.

[33]  J. Tonn,et al.  Clinical quality standards for gamma knife radiosurgery--the Munich protocol. , 2004, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[34]  A Schweikard,et al.  Technical Description, Phantom Accuracy, and Clinical Feasibility for Single-Session Lung Radiosurgery Using Robotic Image-Guided Real-time Respiratory Tumor Tracking , 2007, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[35]  Berndt Wowra,et al.  Quality assurance in stereotactic space. A system test for verifying the accuracy of aim in radiosurgery. , 2002, Medical physics.

[36]  J. Tonn,et al.  Treatment of brain metastases in renal cell carcinoma: radiotherapy, radiosurgery, or surgery? , 2005, World Journal of Urology.

[37]  G. Hartmann.  Quality assurance programme on stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1994, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[38]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Technical description, phantom accuracy, and clinical feasibility for fiducial-free frameless real-time image-guided spinal radiosurgery. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[39]  L Gaspar,et al.  Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  W Curran,et al.  Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.