A New Look at Patent Quality: Relating Patent Prosecution to Validity

The article uses two hand‐collected data sets to implement a novel research design for analyzing the precursors to patent quality. Operationalizing patent “quality” as legal validity, the article analyzes the relation between Federal Circuit decisions on patent validity and three sets of data about the patents: quantitative features of the patents themselves, textual analysis of the patent documents, and data collected from the prosecution histories of the patents. The article finds large and statistically significant relations between ex post validity and both textual features of the patents and ex ante aspects of the prosecution history (especially prior art submissions and the existence of internal patent office appeals before issuance). The results demonstrate the importance of refocusing analysis of patent quality on replicable indicators like validity, and the value that more comprehensive collection of prosecution history data can have for improving the output of the patent prosecution process.

[1]  Juan Alcácer,et al.  Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[2]  James Bessen.  The Value of U.S. Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics , 2006 .

[3]  Mark A. Lemley.  An Empirical Study of the Twenty-Year Patent Term , 1994 .

[4]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[5]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Do Applicant Patent Citations Matter? , 2012 .

[6]  A. Rai,et al.  Who's Afraid of the APA? What the Patent System Can Learn from Administrative Law , 2010 .

[7]  L. Fleming,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: Disentangling the Role of State Borders, Metropolitan Boundaries and Distance , 2010 .

[8]  Ronald J. Mann,et al.  The Disputed Quality of Software Patents , 2007 .

[9]  著書紹介 米国特許制度の破綻とその対応策 James Bessen & Michael J. Meurer, Patent failure: how judges, bureaucrats and lawyers put innovators at risk , 2010 .

[10]  Brian D. Wright,et al.  Why Weak Patents? Rational Ignorance or Pro-'Customer' Tilt? , 2009 .

[11]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis , 2008 .

[12]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Valuable Patents , 2003 .

[13]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Rethinking Patent Law's Presumption of Validity , 2007 .

[14]  Douglas Lichtman,et al.  Rethinking Prosecution History Estoppel , 2003 .

[15]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Ending Patent Law's Willfulness Game , 2003 .

[16]  David Kline,et al.  Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents , 1999 .

[17]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[18]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Ending Abuse of Patent Continuations , 2003 .

[19]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents , 1998 .

[20]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[21]  M. Reitzig.  Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales , 2004 .

[22]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[23]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials , 1997 .

[24]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Science, Social Networks and Spillovers , 2006 .

[25]  George Mason,et al.  Worthless Patents , 2013 .

[26]  Arti K. Rai,et al.  Growing Pains in the Administrative State: The Patent Office's Troubled Quest for Managerial Control , 2009 .

[27]  M. F. Porter,et al.  An algorithm for suffix stripping , 1997 .

[28]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[29]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value , 2006 .

[31]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[32]  Clarisa Long.  The PTO and the Market for Influence in Patent Law , 2009 .

[33]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[34]  Megan J. MacGarvie,et al.  The Private Value of Software Patents , 2006 .

[35]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  The Patent Crisis and How Courts Can Solve It , 2009 .

[36]  G. Moschini.  Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It by Jaffe, Adam B. and Josh Lerner , 2009 .

[37]  Joshua Lerner,et al.  Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It , 2011 .

[38]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from Inventor- and Examiner-added Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.