A novel multi-scale LRMR method for hyperspectral images restoration

Simultaneously recovering hyperspectral images (HSIs) from mixed degradations is a classical inverse problem, which has attracted major research efforts. Low-rank matrix recovery (LRMR) has been proved to be an effective method. This paper proposes a multi-scale recovering model based on 3D Gaussian pyramid decomposition and residual reconstitution to improve the LRMR on its adaptability of local correlative noises (including stripes, dead lines and impulse noise) removal. By compressing the HSI cube to lower-resolution layers in spatial domain, the non-local low rank property of clean HSI can be better utilized. LRMR algorithm is applied from the top. The following layers are reconstituted with the upper recovery result and their original decomposition residual, and then executed LRMR until the bottom of the pyramid. In the proposed procedure, mixed noises are removed progressively in terms of frequency, besides the details of clean HSI are well preserved. Experimental results on simulated and real data in terms of qualitative and quantitative assessments show significant improvements over conventional methods.

[1]  Ping Zhong,et al.  Multiple-Spectral-Band CRFs for Denoising Junk Bands of Hyperspectral Imagery , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Stable Principal Component Pursuit , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[3]  Dacheng Tao,et al.  GoDec: Randomized Lowrank & Sparse Matrix Decomposition in Noisy Case , 2011, ICML.

[4]  Xiangtao Zheng,et al.  Spectral–Spatial Kernel Regularized for Hyperspectral Image Denoising , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Bo Huang,et al.  Shadow Detection and Reconstruction in High-Resolution Satellite Images via Morphological Filtering and Example-Based Learning , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Jing-Hao Xue,et al.  Spectral Nonlocal Restoration of Hyperspectral Images With Low-Rank Property , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Denoising Employing a Spectral–Spatial Adaptive Total Variation Model , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  A MAP-Based Algorithm for Destriping and Inpainting of Remotely Sensed Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Guangyi Chen,et al.  Denoising of Hyperspectral Imagery Using Principal Component Analysis and Wavelet Shrinkage , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Jun Zhou,et al.  Multitask Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Joint Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Imagery Denoising , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  John Wright,et al.  Robust Principal Component Analysis: Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices via Convex Optimization , 2009, NIPS.

[13]  Shen-En Qian,et al.  Noise reduction of hyperspectral imagery using hybrid spatial-spectral derivative-domain wavelet shrinkage , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Restoration Using Low-Rank Matrix Recovery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Minchao Ye,et al.  Hyperspectral Imagery Restoration Using Nonlocal Spectral-Spatial Structured Sparse Representation With Noise Estimation , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[16]  M. Elad,et al.  $rm K$-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.