Potential for Energy Efficiency Improvement Beyond the Light-Duty-Vehicle Sector

The Transportation Energy Futures (TEF) Study evaluates various technological, fuel substitution, and policy options for reducing transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and petroleum use. In 2009, 30 quadrillion Btu of energy were used in the transportation sector. Light-duty vehicles (LDVs), cars and light trucks, account for 55% of this energy use. The other 45% consists of freight and passenger transportation by way of medium- and heavy-duty trucks, buses, aircraft, marine vessels, trains, pipeline, and off-road equipment. These are the non-light-duty vehicle (non-LDV) transportation modes. While there has been considerable research focusing on energy efficiency and fuel substitution options for LDVs, much less attention has been given to non-LDV modes, even though they constitute close to half of the energy used in the transportation sector. An extensive literature review of the non-LDV modes was conducted, and this report brings together the salient findings concerning future energy efficiency options in the time period up to 2050. The studies reviewed provided potential energy savings for individual technologies within each mode, as well as an overall energy savings representing the case where all possible improvements are implemented. The overall mode improvement estimate accounts for mutually exclusive technologies and the possibility that some technologies may counteract the effects of others. In addition, the report discusses the projected activity increases in each of the modes and combine this with forecasts of overall energy efficiency improvement potential to estimate the total GHG emissions relative to current levels and to a “business as usual” case based on Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) 2011 projections. The report find that there is room for technological and operational improvements in energy efficiency for each non-LDV mode. However, energy savings due to these improvements are essentially nullified by projected increases in the volume of activity by the U.S. Energy Information Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration, leaving non-LDV energy use and GHG emissions unchanged from 2010 levels. Considerable improvements will be necessary just to maintain the energy consumption and emission status quo. In order to decrease GHG emissions below 2010 levels, levers such as activity reduction, mode shift, demand reduction, and fuel substitution would need to be implemented in parallel with technological and operational energy efficiency measures. Other reports in the TEF series will address these areas.

[1]  Megan Beardsley,et al.  Median Life, Annual Activity, and Load Factor Values for Nonroad Engine Emissions Modeling , 1998 .

[2]  S. G. Fritz The Potential for LNG as a Railroad Fuel in the U.S. , 2000 .

[3]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[4]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[5]  Andreas Schäfer,et al.  Historical and future trends in aircraft performance, cost, and emissions , 2001 .

[6]  F. Stodolsky,et al.  Railroad and locomotive technology roadmap. , 2003 .

[7]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Aviation emissions and abatement policies in the United States: a city-pair analysis , 2004 .

[8]  Jonas Åkerman,et al.  Sustainable air transport--on track in 2050 , 2005 .

[9]  J. Middel,et al.  Fuel efficiency of commercial aircraft Fuel efficiency of commercial aircraft Fuel efficiency of commercial aircraft Fuel efficiency of commercial aircraft An overview of historical and future trends , 2005 .

[10]  Air Travel – Greener by Design Mitigating the environmental impact of aviation: Opportunities and priorities , 2005, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[11]  L. Joseph Bachman,et al.  Effect of Single Wide Tires and Trailer Aerodynamics on Fuel Economy and NOx Emissions of Class 8 Line-Haul Tractor-Trailers , 2005 .

[12]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  Options for Improving the Energy Efficiency of Intermodal Freight Trains , 2005 .

[13]  Linda Gaines,et al.  Estimation of Fuel Use by Idling Commercial Trucks , 2006 .

[14]  Lance R Grenzeback,et al.  Development of a Rail Freight Demand Model for the National Rail Freight Infrastructure Capacity and Investment Study , 2007 .

[15]  S. Borgerson,et al.  America's Deep Blue Highway: How Coastal Shipping Could Reduce Traffic Congestion, Lower Pollution, and Bolster National Security , 2008 .

[16]  EnergyInformationAdministration Annual Energy Outlook 2008 With Projections to 2030 , 2008 .

[17]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  Optimizing the aerodynamic efficiency of intermodal freight trains , 2008 .

[18]  Thailand. Samnakngān Khana Kammakān Phatthanākān Sētthakit l Chāt,et al.  The 2007 commodity flow survey , 2008 .

[19]  S. Dalsøren,et al.  The Environmental Impacts of Increased International Maritime Shipping Past trends and future perspectives , 2008 .

[20]  Xudong Jia,et al.  Electrification of the freight train network from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to the Inland Empire. , 2008 .

[21]  Andrew Macintosh,et al.  International aviation emissions to 2025: Can emissions be stabilised without restricting demand? , 2008, Energy Policy.

[22]  Daniel Rutherford,et al.  Efficiency Trends for New Commercial Jet Aircraft 1960 to 2008 , 2009 .

[23]  Eric Ballot,et al.  The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from freight transport by pooling supply chains , 2013 .

[24]  Alison Pridmore,et al.  Technical Options to reduce GHG for non-Road Transport Modes (Paper 3) , 2009 .

[25]  David S. Lee,et al.  Aviation and global climate change in the 21st century , 2009, Atmospheric Environment.

[26]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Impacts of Speed Reductions on Vessel-Based Emissions for International Shipping , 2009 .

[27]  Heikki Liimatainen,et al.  Double-deck trailers: a cost-benefit model estimating environmental and fInancial savings , 2010 .

[28]  David S. Lee,et al.  Flying into the future: aviation emissions scenarios to 2050. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Oscar Franzese,et al.  Effect of Wide-Based Single Tires on Fuel Efficiency of Class 8 Combination Trucks , 2010 .

[30]  Ruben DelRosario,et al.  ARMD Fundamental Aeronautics Program , 2010 .

[31]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 30 , 2011 .

[32]  Robert McLaren,et al.  Impact of fuel quality regulation and speed reductions on shipping emissions: implications for climate and air quality. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Albert L. Braslow,et al.  A History of Suction-Type Laminar - Flow Control with Emphasis on Flight Research , 2012 .

[34]  Simo A. Mäkiharju,et al.  Air Lubrication Drag Reduction on Great Lakes Ships , 2012 .

[35]  Marc Melaina,et al.  Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Expansion: Costs, Resources, Production Capacity, and Retail Availability for Low-Carbon Scenarios , 2013 .

[36]  J. Winebrake,et al.  Freight Transportation Demand: Energy-Efficient Scenarios for a Low-Carbon Future , 2013 .

[37]  Robert T Dunphy,et al.  Effects of the Built Environment on Transportation: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Other Factors , 2013 .

[38]  Emily Newes,et al.  Projected Biomass Utilization for Fuels and Power in a Mature Market , 2013 .

[39]  Wendy Tao,et al.  Effects of Travel Reduction and Efficient Driving on Transportation: Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2013 .

[40]  Steve Plotkin,et al.  Vehicle Technology Deployment Pathways: An Examination of Timing and Investment Constraints , 2013 .

[41]  Thomas Stevens Non-Cost Barriers to Consumer Adoption of New Light-Duty Vehicle Technologies , 2013 .