Agronomic performance of maize (Zea mays L.) breeding lines derived from a low nitrogen maize population

Eighteen S1 lines of maize (Zea mays L.) derived from a low nitrogen tolerant pool and two inbred lines were evaluated for agronomic performance under moderate N conditions in the southern Guinea savannah of Nigeria. Generally, the breeding lines differed in yield, growth, vertical root-pulling resistance, N-uptake and N-use efficiency. Breeding lines with high vertical root-pulling resistance took up more N and utilized it more efficiently. They also showed better agronomic performance and recorded higher yields. Principal component and cluster analyses classified the breeding lines into six groups. The results of principal components analyses (PCA) suggest that the most important variables for the classification of the S1 lines were grain yield, plant height, total dry matter during the grain-filling period and at maturity, N-accumulation, N-uptake and N-use efficiency. Other important traits were days to silking, anthesis-silking interval, ears per plant, harvest index and vertical root-pulling resistance. Two groups containing a total of 14 S1 lines that had higher agronomic performance than others are recommended for further evaluation under severe N stress to ascertain their tolerance of low N stress before recombination to form a new population for the next cycle of selection.

[1]  J. Kling,et al.  Association of Vertical Root‐Pulling Resistance with Root Lodging and Grain Yield in Selected S1 Maize Lines Derived from a Tropical Low‐Nitrogen Population , 2003 .

[2]  J. Kling,et al.  The relationship between vertical root-pulling resistance and nitrogen uptake and utilization in maize breeding lines , 2002 .

[3]  W. M. Sullivan,et al.  Root morphology and its relationship with nitrate uptake in Kentucky bluegrass. , 2000 .

[4]  Walter J. Horst,et al.  Growth and distribution of maize roots under nitrogen fertilization in plinthite soil , 1999 .

[5]  G. Edmeades,et al.  The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize , 1996 .

[6]  G. Weber,et al.  System dynamics and the definition of research domains for the northern Guinea savanna of West Africa , 1996 .

[7]  H. Lafitte,et al.  Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical maize II. Grain yield, biomass production, and N accumulation , 1994 .

[8]  R. Mikkelsen,et al.  Recurrent Selection for Maize Grain Yield: Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation and Partitioning Changes , 1994 .

[9]  M. Crétenet,et al.  Fertilité et fertilisation dans la région sud du Mali: du diagnostic au pronostic , 1994 .

[10]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Causes for Silk Delay in a Lowland Tropical Maize Population , 1993 .

[11]  T. Howell Grain, dry matter yield relationships for winter wheat and grain sorghum-Southern High Plains , 1990 .

[12]  W. Russell,et al.  Effects of recurrent selection in two maize synthetics on agronomic traits of S1 lines. , 1989 .

[13]  M. S. Zuber,et al.  Relationship of Root Tensile Strength to Vertical Root Pulling Resistance in Maize , 1988 .

[14]  R. Loomis,et al.  Nitrogen Influences on Yield Determination in Maize 1 , 1986 .

[15]  G. O'Leary,et al.  A simulation model of the development, growth and yield of the wheat crop , 1985 .

[16]  W. Jackson,et al.  Prolificacy in Corn: Its Effects on Nitrate and Ammonium Uptake and Utilization , 1984 .

[17]  E. J. Kamprath,et al.  Nitrogen Fertility Effects on Accumulation, Remobilization, and Partitioning of N and Dry Matter in Corn Genotypes Differing in Prolificacy1 , 1984 .

[18]  R. R. Johnson,et al.  Drought Stress and Its Effects on Maize Reproductive Systems1 , 1981 .

[19]  R. Hageman,et al.  Relationship between Nitrate Uptake, Flux, and Reduction and the Accumulation of Reduced Nitrogen in Maize (Zea mays L.): I. GENOTYPIC VARIATION. , 1980, Plant physiology.

[20]  K. Frey,et al.  Protein Yield and Its Relationship to Other Traits in Backcross Populations from an Arenas ativa ✕ A. sterilis Cross1 , 1979 .

[21]  G. L. Terman Yields and Protein Content of Wheat Grain as Affected by Cultivar, N, and Environmental Growth Factors 1 , 1979 .

[22]  L. Schrader,et al.  Genotypic Differences in Nitrate Absorption and Partitioning of N Among Plant Parts in Maize 1 , 1977 .

[23]  R. Fischer,et al.  Harvest Index in Spaced Populations and Grain Weight in Microplots as Indicators of Yielding Ability in Spring Wheat 1 , 1976 .

[24]  C. Donald,et al.  The Biological Yield and Harvest Index of Cereals as Agronomic and Plant Breeding Criteria , 1976 .

[25]  J. Doe Soil Map of the World , 1957, Nature.