Evaluation of a multi-atlas based method for segmentation of cardiac CTA data: a large-scale, multicenter, and multivendor study.

PURPOSE Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is increasingly used for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, CTA is not commonly used for the assessment of ventricular and atrial function, although functional information extracted from CTA data is expected to improve the diagnostic value of the examination. In clinical practice, the extraction of ventricular and atrial functional information, such as stroke volume and ejection fraction, requires accurate delineation of cardiac chambers. In this paper, we investigated the accuracy and robustness of cardiac chamber delineation using a multiatlas based segmentation method on multicenter and multivendor CTA data. METHODS A fully automatic multiatlas based method for segmenting the whole heart (i.e., the outer surface of the pericardium) and cardiac chambers from CTA data is presented and evaluated. In the segmentation approach, eight atlas images are registered to a new patient's CTA scan. The eight corresponding manually labeled images are then propagated and combined using a per voxel majority voting procedure, to obtain a cardiac segmentation. RESULTS The method was evaluated on a multicenter/multivendor database, consisting of (1) a set of 1380 Siemens scans from 795 patients and (2) a set of 60 multivendor scans (Siemens, Philips, and GE) from different patients, acquired in six different institutions worldwide. A leave-one-out 3D quantitative validation was carried out on the eight atlas images; we obtained a mean surface-to-surface error of 0.94 +/- 1.12 mm and an average Dice coefficient of 0.93 was achieved. A 2D quantitative evaluation was performed on the 60 multivendor data sets. Here, we observed a mean surface-to-surface error of 1.26 +/- 1.25 mm and an average Dice coefficient of 0.91 was achieved. In addition to this quantitative evaluation, a large-scale 2D and 3D qualitative evaluation was performed on 1380 and 140 images, respectively. Experts evaluated that 49% of the 1380 images were very accurately segmented (below 1 mm error) and that 29% were accurately segmented (error between 1 and 3 mm), which demonstrates the robustness of the presented method. CONCLUSIONS A fully automatic method for whole heart and cardiac chamber segmentation was presented and evaluated using multicenter/multivendor CTA data. The accuracy and robustness of the method were demonstrated by successfully applying the method to 1420 multicenter/ multivendor data sets.

[1]  Gareth Funka-Lea,et al.  Automatic heart isolation for CT coronary visualization using graph-cuts , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[2]  A. Engel,et al.  Feasibility of automatic assessment of four-chamber cardiac function with MDCT: Initial clinical application and validation. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[3]  Josien P. W. Pluim,et al.  Evaluation of Optimization Methods for Nonrigid Medical Image Registration Using Mutual Information and B-Splines , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  J. Barkhausen,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-detector-row computed tomography in patients with a low to moderate pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease , 2007, Acta radiologica.

[5]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Halton Sampling for Image Registration Based on Mutual Information , 2008 .

[6]  A. Türkvatan,et al.  Clinical value of 16-slice multidetector computed tomography in symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease , 2008, Acta radiologica.

[7]  Michaël Sdika,et al.  Combining atlas based segmentation and intensity classification with nearest neighbor transform and accuracy weighted vote , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  James F. O'Brien,et al.  Shape transformation using variational implicit functions , 1999, SIGGRAPH 1999.

[9]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  A survey of hierarchical non-linear medical image registration , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Lisa M. Brown,et al.  A survey of image registration techniques , 1992, CSUR.

[13]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Multi-Atlas-Based Segmentation With Local Decision Fusion—Application to Cardiac and Aortic Segmentation in CT Scans , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Olivier Ecabert,et al.  Optimizing boundary detection via Simulated Search with applications to multi-modal heart segmentation , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Adaptive local multi-atlas segmentation: Application to the heart and the caudate nucleus , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  Michael Unser,et al.  A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[18]  Michael Unser,et al.  Optimization of mutual information for multiresolution image registration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  Colin Studholme,et al.  Automated 3-D registration of MR and CT images of the head , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[21]  Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano,et al.  Combination Strategies in Multi-Atlas Image Segmentation: Application to Brain MR Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimisation for Image Registration , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Fully automatic cardiac segmentation from 3D CTA data: a multi-atlas based approach , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[24]  Olivier Ecabert,et al.  Automatic Model-Based Segmentation of the Heart in CT Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  A Generative Model for Image Segmentation Based on Label Fusion , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  LEAP: Learning embeddings for atlas propagation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information. , 2008, Medical physics.

[28]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling for functional analysis of cardiac images, a review , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  L. Boxt CT Anatomy of the heart , 2005, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[30]  Michael Unser,et al.  Fast parametric elastic image registration , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[31]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  A comprehensive shape model of the heart , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[32]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains , 2004, NeuroImage.

[33]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[35]  Martin Styner,et al.  Standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for evaluating coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[36]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Four-Chamber Heart Modeling and Automatic Segmentation for 3-D Cardiac CT Volumes Using Marginal Space Learning and Steerable Features , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.