Technology and active agency of older adults living in service house environment

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of the study was to explore whether or not the assistive and safety technology that is currently used in service house environment supports the active agency of the elderly residents. Method: Twelve purposively chosen elderly residents were interviewed. The data were analyzed by theory-driven content analysis using the modalities of the agency-model as a theoretical frame. Results: The technological devices and systems partially support the active agency of the residents. Deterioration of their functioning seems to limit the use of devices as well as complicate their learning on how to use these systems. The respondents had only few insights of the possibilities that this technology could offer to them in their daily life and they were not expecting their functioning to improve in the future. The homeliness and intimacy of the environment was highly appreciated. Conclusions: Although the attitude towards technology was, in general, reserved, technology was seen as one possibility to support active agency. The current technologies seem to be designed from the needs of the organization and not from the needs of the residents. In the future, more emphasis needs to be put on designing individualized devices in cooperation with the users. Implications for Rehabilitation To support independence, autonomy and active agency of the older adults, the technological solutions must be based on perceived needs of the individual and the design should be adaptable to the functional limitations one has. Nursing staff’s knowledge about assistive devices and technologies need to be updated on regular bases in order to be able to recommend appropriate devices for the elderly. Taking into account the fact that many older adults have mild to moderate memory problems as well as difficulties with vision and hearing, more attention needs to be paid to didactics, i.e. how the introduction and guidance of the use of new technologies, assistive devices or safety systems is best done with them.

[1]  D. Silverman Doing Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[2]  M. Skubic,et al.  Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. , 2008, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[3]  Ingrid Mulder,et al.  Who will watch (over) me? Humane monitoring in dementia care , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  J. V. Hoofa,et al.  Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: Perspectives of older users , 2011 .

[5]  K. Daniel,et al.  Emerging technologies to enhance the safety of older people in their homes. , 2009, Geriatric nursing.

[6]  V. Marshall Agency, Events, and Structure at the End of the Life Course☆ , 2005 .

[7]  K. Malterud Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  S. Zwijsen,et al.  Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: An overview of the literature , 2011, Aging & mental health.

[9]  Gunvor Gard,et al.  Safety vs. privacy: elderly persons' experiences of a mobile safety alarm. , 2008, Health & social care in the community.

[10]  M. Chan,et al.  Smart homes - current features and future perspectives. , 2009, Maturitas.

[11]  William L. Miller,et al.  Using Codes and Code Manuals: A Template Organizing Style of Interpretation , 1999 .

[12]  P. Routasalo,et al.  Personal resources supporting living at home as described by older home care clients. , 2008, International journal of nursing practice.

[13]  Old Age and Agency , 2004 .

[14]  Lennart Magnusson,et al.  A literature review study of Information and Communication Technology as a support for frail older people living at home and their family carers , 2004 .