Evaluating solutions to overcome humanitarian supply chain management barriers: A hybrid fuzzy SWARA – Fuzzy WASPAS approach

Abstract This study intends to explore humanitarian supply chain management barriers (HSCMBs) and evaluate solutions for overcoming these barriers to improve humanitarian supply chain management (HSCM) implementation. This study aims to evaluate the solutions to overcome HSCMBs using a hybrid framework that consists of fuzzy step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and a fuzzy weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS). This study identifies 29 HSCMBs and 20 solutions to overcome these HSCMBs through a literature review and brainstorming session conducted among experts. Fuzzy SWARA is applied to compute the weight of HSCMBs and evaluate the relative importance of each HSCMB. Fuzzy WASPAS is applied to rank the solutions to overcome HSCMBs for efficient and effective HSCM implementation. The outcome of this study suggests that “Long term strategic planning for humanitarian operation” is the highest-ranked and most immediate solution, followed by “Collaboration, cooperation, and coordination among humanitarian supply chain actors” to overcome HSCMBs. Disaster relief aid agencies and stakeholders who may focus on the solutions to overcome HSCMBs for effective humanitarian aid operations and to improve strategies of HSCM. This study helps humanitarian logisticians to formulate improved strategies for better operational performance in pre and post-disaster phases.

[1]  Anne Leslie Davidson.  Key performance indicators in humanitarian logistics , 2006 .

[2]  S. Gold,et al.  Sustainable humanitarian supply chain management – exploring new theory , 2017 .

[3]  François-Xavier Delmonteil,et al.  The role of satellite technologies in relief logistics , 2017 .

[4]  G. Kovács,et al.  Identifying challenges in humanitarian logistics , 2009 .

[5]  Prasun Das,et al.  A cost optimization model and solutions for shelter allocation and relief distribution in flood scenario , 2017, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[6]  Esra Ilbahar,et al.  Retail store performance measurement using a novel interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy WASPAS method , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[7]  S. Pettit,et al.  Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains , 2009 .

[8]  Wilson Adarme-Jaimes,et al.  Agent-based model for material convergence in humanitarian logistics , 2016 .

[9]  M. Klumpp,et al.  The value of fourth-party logistics services in the humanitarian supply chain , 2015 .

[10]  Gyöngyi Kovács,et al.  The humanitarian common logistic operating picture: a solution to the inter-agency coordination challenge. , 2017, Disasters.

[11]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment , 2012 .

[12]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Analysing the interaction of factors for resilient humanitarian supply chain , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[13]  Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani,et al.  New Application of SWARA Method in Prioritizing Sustainability Assessment Indicators of Energy System , 2014 .

[14]  Huchang Liao,et al.  Electric vehicle charging station site selection by an integrated hesitant fuzzy swara-waspas method , 2019 .

[15]  Abbas Seifi,et al.  A humanitarian logistics model for disaster relief operation considering network failure and standard relief time: A case study on San Francisco district , 2015 .

[16]  Negar Shaaban,et al.  A fuzzy hybrid approach for ranking and allocation of flare gas recovery methods , 2019, Kybernetes.

[17]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  Rameshwar Dubey,et al.  Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination? , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[19]  R. Shankar,et al.  Prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics implementation to mitigate its barriers: A hybrid modified SWARA and WASPAS approach , 2019 .

[20]  Mark M. J. Wilson,et al.  Best practice relief supply for emergency services in a developed economy , 2018 .

[21]  G. Kovács,et al.  Trends and developments in humanitarian logistics – a gap analysis , 2011 .

[22]  Fabio Sgarbossa,et al.  Reverse logistics in humanitarian operations: challenges and opportunities , 2015 .

[23]  Quan Zhou,et al.  Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2011 .

[24]  S. Zailani,et al.  Coordination of efforts in disaster relief supply chains: the moderating role of resource scarcity and redundancy , 2018 .

[25]  Karen Spens,et al.  Cracking the humanitarian logistic coordination challenge: lessons from the urban search and rescue community. , 2016, Disasters.

[26]  Himanshu Gupta,et al.  A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Caroline C. Krejci,et al.  Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: Practices, challenges and opportunities , 2010 .

[28]  Cyril R. H. Foropon,et al.  Process improvement in humanitarian operations: an organisational theory perspective , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[29]  Alfonso J. Pedraza-Martinez,et al.  Humanitarian Funding in a Multi‐Donor Market with Donation Uncertainty , 2016 .

[30]  Andrea Masini,et al.  Exploring the link between the humanitarian logistician and training needs , 2013 .

[31]  Pervaiz Akhtar,et al.  Understanding behavioural intention to use information technology: Insights from humanitarian practitioners , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[32]  C. Dang,et al.  Materials procurement and reserves policies for humanitarian logistics with recycling and replenishment mechanisms , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[33]  Majid Vafaeipour,et al.  Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach , 2014 .

[34]  Yi Peng,et al.  A Group Decision Making Model for Integrating Heterogeneous Information , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[35]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2016 .

[36]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  An evidential DEMATEL method to identify critical success factors in emergency management , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[37]  Hanna Watling,et al.  Barriers to disability-inclusive disaster management in the Solomon Islands: Perspectives of people with disability , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[38]  Snežana Tadić,et al.  Assessment of the political city logistics initiatives sustainability , 2018 .

[39]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  An Approach to Personnel Selection in the Tourism Industry Based on the SWARA and the WASPAS Methods , 2017 .

[40]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  An Extended Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis with Symmetric Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets for Determining the Subjective Weights of Criteria in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems , 2018, Symmetry.

[41]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  Evaluation of a Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Using a Rough SWARA-WASPAS Model Based on a New Rough Dombi Aggregator , 2018, Symmetry.

[42]  Ben Brooks,et al.  Supply chain agility in humanitarian protracted operations , 2016 .

[43]  S. Moscovici,et al.  The group as a polarizer of attitudes. , 1969 .

[44]  Jarrod Goentzel,et al.  Case study of a humanitarian logistics simulation exercise and insights for training design , 2015 .

[45]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Facility location in humanitarian relief , 2008 .

[46]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Risk assessment of construction projects , 2010 .

[47]  G. Kovács,et al.  The application of "swift trust" to humanitarian logistics , 2010 .

[48]  Jarrod Goentzel,et al.  Measuring humanitarian supply chain performance in a multi-goal context , 2015 .

[49]  Aruna Apte,et al.  Capabilities and competencies in humanitarian operations , 2016 .

[50]  Gianmarco Baldini,et al.  Disaster Prevention and Management : An International Journal Securing disaster supply chains with cryptography enhanced RFID , 2016 .

[51]  Ravi Kant,et al.  A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of Knowledge Management adoption in Supply Chain to overcome its barriers , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluation of Real-Time Intelligent Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges Based on SWARA-WASPAS; A Case in Iran , 2014 .

[53]  Selçuk Perçin,et al.  An integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy AD approach for outsourcing provider selection , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[54]  Pervaiz Akhtar,et al.  Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: chain coordinators , 2012 .

[55]  Daria Battini,et al.  Sustainable humanitarian operations: Closed-loop supply chain , 2016 .

[56]  S. Gouda,et al.  Trust in humanitarian operations: a content analytic approach for an Indian NGO , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[57]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[58]  G. Kovács,et al.  Cash-based response in relief: the impact for humanitarian logistics , 2018 .

[59]  C. Brewster,et al.  Decision-making and operations in disasters: challenges and opportunities , 2018 .

[60]  Christopher Sandwell,et al.  A qualitative study exploring the challenges of humanitarian organisations , 2011 .

[61]  Amine Belhadi,et al.  Prioritizing the solutions of lean implementation in SMEs to overcome its barriers , 2017 .

[62]  Gaurav Kabra,et al.  Analyzing drivers and barriers of coordination in humanitarian supply chain management under fuzzy environment , 2015 .

[63]  Chen Yan,et al.  Identifying key skill sets in humanitarian logistics: Developing a model for Sri Lanka , 2017 .

[64]  Matthias Klumpp,et al.  Humanitarian supply chains and performance measurement schemes in practice , 2015 .

[65]  Selman Aydin,et al.  The best fuel selection with hybrid multiple-criteria decision making approaches in a CI engine fueled with their blends and pure biodiesels produced from different sources , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[66]  Gyöngyi Kovács,et al.  What Is Special about a Humanitarian Logistician? A Survey of Logistic Skills and Performance , 2010 .

[67]  Jihai Zhang,et al.  Agent-based evaluation of humanitarian relief goods supply capability , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[68]  Ali Bozorgi-Amiri,et al.  Coordination of relief items procurement in humanitarian logistic based on quantity flexibility contract , 2018, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[69]  Anisya S. Thomas,et al.  Logistics training: necessity or luxury? , 2005 .

[70]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Designing an efficient humanitarian supply network , 2016 .

[71]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Blockchain technology for enhancing swift-trust, collaboration and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[72]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF) , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[73]  Arun Kumar Biswal,et al.  Warehouse efficiency improvement using RFID in a humanitarian supply chain: Implications for Indian food security system , 2018 .

[74]  Chandra Prakash,et al.  Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment , 2015 .

[75]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) , 2010 .

[76]  Cyril R. H. Foropon,et al.  Big data analytics and organizational culture as complements to swift trust and collaborative performance in the humanitarian supply chain , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[77]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[78]  R. D. Souza,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Swift Trust in Humanitarian Logistics Operations , 2018 .

[79]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  On the unique features of post‐disaster humanitarian logistics , 2012 .

[80]  Sabari R. Prasanna,et al.  Collaboration in humanitarian supply chains: an organisational culture framework , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[81]  S. Leeuw,et al.  Cross-sector humanitarian–business partnerships in managing humanitarian logistics: an empirical verification , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[82]  S. Hertz,et al.  The coordination roles of relief organisations in humanitarian logistics , 2016 .

[83]  Gaurav Kabra,et al.  Identification and prioritization of coordination barriers in humanitarian supply chain management , 2015 .

[84]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A comprehensive framework for analyzing challenges in humanitarian supply chain management: A case study of the Iranian Red Crescent Society , 2020, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[85]  M. Piecyk,et al.  Performance measurement in humanitarian logistics: a customer-oriented approach , 2014 .

[86]  Sule Itir Satoglu,et al.  A two-stage stochastic model for location planning of temporary medical centers for disaster response , 2020 .

[87]  Lijo John,et al.  Modeling the Barriers of Humanitarian Supply Chain Management in India , 2016 .

[88]  Tushar N. Desai,et al.  Prioritising solutions for Lean Six Sigma adoption barriers through fuzzy AHP-modified TOPSIS framework , 2018, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma.

[89]  Linda S. G. L. Wauben,et al.  Systemic barriers and enablers in humanitarian technology transfer , 2016 .

[90]  Vasileios Zeimpekis,et al.  Emergency evacuation planning in natural disasters under diverse population and fleet characteristics , 2018, Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management.

[91]  Marianne Jahre,et al.  Defining logistics preparedness: a framework and research agenda , 2016 .

[92]  Akhilesh Barve,et al.  Modeling Post-disaster Challenges of Humanitarian Supply Chains: A TISM Approach , 2016 .

[93]  Mohammad Moshtari.  Inter‐Organizational Fit, Relationship Management Capability, and Collaborative Performance within a Humanitarian Setting , 2016 .

[94]  Kevin Heaslip,et al.  Reliability based pre-positioning of recovery centers for resilient transportation infrastructure , 2016 .

[95]  Akhilesh Barve,et al.  Analysis of critical success factors of humanitarian supply chain: An application of Interpretive Structural Modeling , 2015 .

[96]  Arunodaya Raj Mishra,et al.  Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy WASPAS Method: Application in Reservoir Flood Control Management Policy , 2018, Group Decision and Negotiation.

[97]  Richard Oloruntoba,et al.  Theory in humanitarian operations research , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[98]  Ananth Krishnamurthy,et al.  Evaluating relief center designs for disaster relief distribution , 2018 .

[99]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of construction equipment with sustainability considerations , 2018 .

[100]  Kavitha Ganesan,et al.  An integrated new threshold FCMs Markov chain based forecasting model for analyzing the power of stock trading trend , 2019, Financial Innovation.

[101]  Hadi Ghaderi,et al.  Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[102]  Yang Chen,et al.  Pairwise comparison matrix in multiple criteria decision making , 2016 .

[103]  Yi Peng,et al.  Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[104]  Melih Çelik,et al.  Network restoration and recovery in humanitarian operations: Framework, literature review, and research directions , 2016 .

[105]  Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani,et al.  Planning the priority of high tech industries based on SWARA-WASPAS methodology: The case of the nanotechnology industry in Iran , 2015 .

[106]  T. Saaty,et al.  Group decision-making: Head-count versus intensity of preference , 2007 .

[107]  Ümit Bilge,et al.  A robust disaster preparedness model for effective and fair disaster response , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[108]  H. Dangi,et al.  Drivers and Indicators of Performance in Relief Chain: An Empirical Study , 2016 .

[109]  Mohammad Reza Sadeghi Moghadam,et al.  Analyzing the barriers to humanitarian supply chain management: A case study of the Tehran Red Crescent Societies , 2017 .

[110]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers , 2016 .

[111]  Sonia Giovinazzi,et al.  Critical success factors for post-disaster infrastructure recovery , 2016 .

[112]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[113]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  A Fuzzy WASPAS-Based Approach to Determine Critical Information Infrastructures of EU Sustainable Development , 2019, Sustainability.

[114]  R. Oloruntoba,et al.  Humanitarian aid : an agile supply chain? , 2006 .

[115]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Identification and analysis of reverse logistics barriers using fuzzy Delphi method and AHP , 2016 .

[116]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  The sustainable humanitarian supply chain design: agility, adaptability and alignment , 2016 .

[117]  Yi Peng,et al.  Evaluation of Classification Algorithms Using MCDM and Rank Correlation , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[118]  Nadia Saad Noori,et al.  Dynamics of coordination-clusters in long-term rehabilitation , 2016 .

[119]  Richard Oloruntoba,et al.  A wave of destruction and the waves of relief: issues, challenges and strategies , 2005 .

[120]  Alain Vaillancourt.  Procurement consolidation in humanitarian supply chains: a case study , 2017 .

[121]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  Relevance of humanitarian logistics research: Best practices and way forward , 2017 .

[122]  Kuan Yew Wong,et al.  Toward a dynamic balanced scorecard model for humanitarian relief organizations’ performance management , 2017 .

[123]  M. Goh,et al.  Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry , 2017 .

[124]  Marianne Jahre,et al.  How standards and modularity can improve humanitarian supply chain responsiveness: the case of emergency response units , 2015 .

[125]  Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman,et al.  A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[126]  G. Kovács,et al.  Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations , 2007 .

[127]  Jiuh-Biing Sheu,et al.  Challenges of emergency logistics management , 2007 .

[128]  Kyle H. Goldschmidt,et al.  Humanitarian operations and crisis/disaster management: A retrospective review of the literature and framework for development , 2016 .

[129]  Ulla Anttila.  Human security and learning in crisis management , 2014 .

[130]  Peter A. Rogerson,et al.  A logistics model for emergency supply of critical items in the aftermath of a disaster , 2011 .

[131]  Raktim Pal,et al.  Information Diffusion among Agents: Implications for Humanitarian Operations , 2014 .

[132]  Arunodaya Raj Mishra,et al.  A novel hesitant fuzzy WASPAS method for assessment of green supplier problem based on exponential information measures , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[133]  Ravi Kant,et al.  Prioritising the solutions to overcome the barriers of green supply chain management implementation: a hybrid fuzzy AHP- VIKOR framework approach , 2018, J. Decis. Syst..

[134]  P. Larson,et al.  What skills are needed to be a humanitarian logistician , 2012 .