Development and characterization of a magnetorheological elastomer based adaptive seismic isolator

One of the main shortcomings in current base isolation design/practice is lack of adaptability. As a result, a base isolation system that is effective for one type earthquake may become ineffective or may have adverse effect for other earthquakes. The vulnerability of traditional base isolation systems can be exaggerated by two types of earthquakes, i.e. near-field earthquakes and far-field earthquakes. This paper addresses the challenge facing current base isolation design/practice by proposing a new type of seismic isolator for the base isolation system, namely an adaptive seismic isolator. The novel adaptive seismic isolator utilizes magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) for its field-sensitive material property. Traditional seismic isolator design with a unique laminated structure of steel and MRE layers has been adopted in the novel MRE seismic isolator. To evaluate and characterize the behavior of the MRE seismic isolator, experimental testing was conducted on a shake table facility under harmonic cycling loading. Experimental results show that the proposed adaptive seismic isolator can successfully alter the lateral stiffness and damping force in real time up to 37% and 45% respectively. Based on the successful development of the novel adaptive seismic isolator, a discussion is also extended to the impact and potential applications of such a device in structural control applications in civil engineering.

[1]  H. Du,et al.  A dynamic absorber with a soft magnetorheological elastomer for powertrain vibration suppression , 2009 .

[2]  Matthias Kröger,et al.  MRE Properties under Shear and Squeeze Modes and Applications , 2010 .

[3]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Base isolation for near‐fault motions , 2001 .

[4]  Kazuo Inoue,et al.  Classification of damage to steel buildings observed in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake , 1998 .

[5]  Anil K. Agrawal,et al.  Semi-active hybrid control systems for nonlinear buildings against near-field earthquakes , 2002 .

[6]  Kenneth A. Cunefare,et al.  Performance of MRE-based Vibration Absorbers , 2008 .

[7]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  “Smart” Base Isolation Strategies Employing Magnetorheological Dampers , 2002 .

[8]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy model of hybrid semi-active base isolation system with FPS bearings and an MR damper , 2006 .

[9]  Z. C. Ni,et al.  Study on a Dynamic Stiffness-tuning Absorber with Squeeze-strain Enhanced Magnetorheological Elastomer , 2009 .

[10]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[11]  J. Gough,et al.  High damping natural rubber seismic isolators , 1997 .

[12]  Muhammad Usman,et al.  Numerical investigation of smart base isolation system employing MR elastomer , 2009 .

[13]  Ging Long Lin,et al.  Fuzzy Friction Controllers For Semi-active Seismic Isolation Systems , 2009 .

[14]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  "SMART" BASE ISOLATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[15]  S. Opie,et al.  Design and control of a real-time variable stiffness vibration isolator , 2009, 2009 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[16]  Shouhu Xuan,et al.  The design of an active–adaptive tuned vibration absorber based on magnetorheological elastomer and its vibration attenuation performance , 2011 .

[17]  James M. Kelly,et al.  The role of damping in seismic isolation , 1999 .

[18]  Alexei R. Khokhlov,et al.  Effect of a homogeneous magnetic field on the mechanical behavior of soft magnetic elastomers under compression , 2006 .

[19]  Jeong-Hoi Koo,et al.  Seismic Performance Analysis of A Smart Base-isolation System Considering Dynamics of MR Elastomers , 2011 .

[20]  Huaxia Deng,et al.  Application of magnetorheological elastomer to vibration absorber , 2008 .

[21]  In-Ho Hwang,et al.  A Study on Base Isolation Performance of Magneto-Sensitive Rubbers , 2006 .

[22]  A. Puertas,et al.  Microrheology of colloidal systems , 2014, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[23]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice , 1999 .

[24]  John Matthew Ginder,et al.  Magnetorheological elastomers in tunable vibration absorbers , 2001, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[25]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Base Isolation: Linear Theory and Design , 1990 .

[26]  Peng Pan,et al.  BASE-ISOLATION DESIGN PRACTICE IN JAPAN: INTRODUCTION TO THE POST-KOBE APPROACH , 2005 .

[27]  Petros Komodromos,et al.  Seismic Isolation for Earthquake Resistant Structures , 2000 .

[28]  Weihua Li,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of MR elastomers under harmonic loading , 2010 .

[29]  N. Wongprasert,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Adaptive Elastomeric Base-Isolated Structures Using Variable-Orifice Fluid Dampers , 2005 .

[30]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  Structural control benchmark problem: Phase II—Nonlinear smart base-isolated building subjected to near-fault earthquakes , 2008 .

[31]  William Robinson,et al.  Lead‐rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes , 1982 .

[32]  A. Chopra,et al.  Comparing response of SDF systems to near‐fault and far‐fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions , 2001 .

[33]  Shi Sha Zhu,et al.  Experimental Study of Magnetorheological Elastomer Vibration Isolator , 2011 .

[34]  B. F. Spencer,et al.  STATE OF THE ART OF STRUCTURAL CONTROL , 2003 .

[35]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Hybrid base-isolation with magnetorheological damper and fuzzy control , 2007 .

[36]  Fabio Mazza,et al.  Effects of near‐fault ground motions on the nonlinear dynamic response of base‐isolated r.c. framed buildings , 2012 .

[37]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Seismic Isolation Systems for Developing Countries , 2002 .

[38]  Troy Alexander Morgan The use of innovative base isolation systems to achieve complex seismic performance objectives , 2007 .