Concepts and guidelines for diagnostic assessments of agricultural innovation capacity

This paper is divided into two parts. The first part sets out a conceptual framework for diagnostic assessments of agricultural innovation capacity. It explains that contemporary patterns of agricultural development demand fresh thinking on how innovation can be promoted in ways that can deal with rapidly evolving production and market conditions. The innovation systems concept is presented as a framework for examining the notion of innovation capacity. The second part of the paper provides guidance on how the principles of this conceptual framework can be used in diagnostic assessments. These guidelines include a number of typological tools to explore the qualitative aspects of innovation capacity – particularly patterns of interaction and the habits and practices that inform these.

[1]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Why Research Partnerships Really Matter: Innovation Theory, Institutional Arrangements and Implications for Developing New Technology for the Poor , 2001 .

[2]  Niels Röling,et al.  EXTENSION SCIENCE: INCREASINGLY PREOCCUPIED WITH KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS* , 1985 .

[3]  L. Mytelka,et al.  Catching up in new wave technologies , 2004 .

[4]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: an innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it , 2005 .

[5]  José Eduardo Cassiolato,et al.  Systems of Innovation and Development , 2003 .

[6]  L. Mytelka Competition, Innovation and Competitiveness in Developing Countries , 2000 .

[7]  正弘 中舘 OECD (経済開発協力機構) : Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , 1991 .

[8]  Poh-Kam Wong National Innovation Systems for Rapid Technological Catch-up : An analytical framework and a comparative analysis of Korea , Taiwan and Singapore , 1999 .

[9]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[10]  B. Dalum National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[11]  Simon Maxwell,et al.  Food Policy Old and New , 2003 .

[12]  L. Mytelka LOCAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD ECONOMY , 2000 .

[13]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Research as Capacity Building: The Case of an NGO Facilitated Post-Harvest Innovation System for the Himalayan Hills , 2003 .

[14]  A. Hall,et al.  Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: concepts, contexts, case studies and operational challenges of a systems perspective , 2006 .

[15]  Lynn K. Mytelka,et al.  Clustering, long distance partnerships and the SME: a study of the French biotechnology sector , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[16]  C. Freeman Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[17]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[18]  James Joyce,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977, Medical History.

[19]  K. Green National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[20]  Lynn K. Mytelka,et al.  From Local Clusters to Innovation Systems , 2003 .

[21]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[22]  L. Mytelka The Unfulfilled Promise of African Industrialization , 1989, African Studies Review.

[23]  R. Rousseva,et al.  Technological capabilities with different degree of coherence: a comparative study of domestic-oriented vs. export-driven Bulgarian software companies , 2006 .