AC 2007-1515: EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PERFORMANCE ON ENGINEERING TASKS, CONFIDENCE, GENDER AND FIRST YEAR PERSISTENCE

In this exploratory study our analyses show that although first-year women performed equally well as their male counterparts on an engineering task, they reported significantly lower self-ratings of confidence in their intellectual and technical abilities (math and science) than men, yet still persisted at the same rate as their male counterparts during the first year. These findings stand in contrast to other studies which have shown self-confidence to be positively related with successful achievement of goals (i.e. performing an engineering task successfully, graduating from an engineering program). Therefore, we seek to explain this apparent contradiction through expectancy and cognitive dissonance theory and suggest that first year programs have a unique opportunity to help students by aligning their expectations with engineering school experience and increasing the potential for successful completion of an engineering program.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[3]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering , 1997 .

[4]  June C. Chang.  Women and Minorities in the Science, Mathematics and Engineering Pipeline. ERIC Digest. , 2002 .

[5]  Fiona Goodchild.  The Pipeline: Still Leaking , 2004 .

[6]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. , 1988 .

[7]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition , 1987 .

[8]  J. Burtner.  The Use of Discriminant Analysis to Investigate the Influence of Non‐Cognitive Factors on Engineering School Persistence , 2005 .

[9]  John P. Wanous,et al.  Organizational Entry: Recruitment, Selection, Orientation, and Socialization of Newcomers , 1991 .

[10]  Y. Ommundsen,et al.  The concept of expectancy: a central factor in various personality dispositions , 2004 .

[11]  B. K. Hawks,et al.  Women and Men Engineering Students: Anticipation of Family and Work Roles , 1998 .

[12]  M. Hunt,et al.  心理学的故事 = The story of psychology , 1993 .

[13]  A. Tesser.  On the Confluence of Self-Esteem Maintenance Mechanisms , 2000 .

[14]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[15]  Ozgur Eris,et al.  Development Of The Persistence In Engineering (Pie) Survey Instrument , 2005 .

[16]  C. Atman,et al.  Gender and Ethnicity Differences in Freshmen Engineering Student Attitudes: A Cross‐Institutional Study * , 2001 .

[17]  Blythe McVicker Clinchy,et al.  Women s ways of knowing: The development of self , 1988 .

[18]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners , 2007 .

[19]  M. Belenky,et al.  Women's ways of knowing : the development of self, voice, and mind , 1988 .

[20]  H. Cooper,et al.  The Relation Between Self-Beliefs and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2004 .

[21]  A. Astin.  What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[22]  John B. Miner,et al.  Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Theories, and Analyses , 2002 .

[23]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes , 1999 .

[24]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Information Gathering: A Critical Step for Quality in the Design Process , 1997 .

[25]  R. Felder,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. III. Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes , 1995 .