Hybrid Pair Programming - A Promising Alternative to Standard Pair Programming
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al. The Importance of Producing Shared Code Through Pair Programming , 2018, SIGCSE.
[2] Yingjun Cao,et al. Two-Stage Programming Projects: Individual Work Followed by Peer Collaboration , 2018, SIGCSE.
[3] Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al. Thematic Analysis of Students' Reflections on Pair Programming in CS1 , 2018, SIGCSE.
[4] Beth Simon,et al. Peer instruction: do students really learn from peer discussion in computing? , 2011, ICER.
[5] Nicole Herbert. Quantitative peer assessment: can students be objective? , 2007 .
[6] Charles E. McDowell,et al. The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course , 2002, SIGCSE '02.
[7] Tim Wahls,et al. The benefits of pairing by ability , 2010, SIGCSE.
[8] Jill Denner,et al. Observations of Pair Programming: Variations in Collaboration Across Demographic Groups , 2016, SIGCSE.
[9] Laurie A. Williams,et al. On understanding compatibility of student pair programmers , 2004, SIGCSE '04.
[10] Laurie Williams,et al. The costs and benefits of pair programming , 2001 .
[11] Emilia Mendes,et al. Empirical Studies of Pair Programming for CS/SE Teaching in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
[12] Xiaosong Li,et al. Using Peer Review to Assess Coding Standards - A Case Study , 2006, Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference.
[13] Yingjun Cao,et al. Impact of Performance Level and Group Composition on Student Learning during Collaborative Exams , 2017, ITiCSE.
[14] Loren G. Terveen,et al. Two peers are better than one: aggregating peer reviews for computing assignments is surprisingly accurate , 2009, GROUP.
[15] Anya Tafliovich,et al. A student perspective on prior experience in CS1 , 2013, SIGCSE '13.
[16] Brenda Cantwell Wilson,et al. Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors , 2001, SIGCSE '01.
[17] Charles E. McDowell,et al. Experimenting with pair programming in the classroom , 2003, ITiCSE.
[18] Jeffrey C. Carver,et al. Increased Retention of Early Computer Science and Software Engineering Students Using Pair Programming , 2007, 20th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'07).
[19] Philip J. Guo,et al. CodePilot: Scaffolding End-to-End Collaborative Software Development for Novice Programmers , 2017, CHI.
[20] Beth Simon,et al. Halving fail rates using peer instruction: a study of four computer science courses , 2013, SIGCSE '13.
[21] Yingjun Cao,et al. Evaluating Student Learning from Collaborative Group Tests in Introductory Computing , 2017, SIGCSE.
[22] Laurie A. Williams,et al. Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming , 2003, SIGCSE.
[23] Charles E. McDowell,et al. Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality , 2006, CACM.
[24] J. K. L. Poon. Students' perceptions of peer evaluation in project work , 2011, ACE 2011.
[25] Mark Sherriff,et al. Compatibility of partnered students in computer science education , 2010, SIGCSE.
[26] Davide Fossati,et al. Interactions of Individual and Pair Programmers with an Intelligent Tutoring System for Computer Science , 2017, SIGCSE.
[27] Clifton Kussmaul,et al. Results from a Survey of Faculty Adoption of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Computer Science , 2016, ITiCSE.
[28] J. Aultman. Hidden Curriculum , 2007 .
[29] Michelle K. Smith,et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[30] Benjamin Yu,et al. Turning exams into a learning experience , 2010, SIGCSE.