Measuring Surface Roughness of Pharmaceutical Powders Using Vapor Sorption Methods

Particle morphology of pharmaceutical solids has practical importance for several reasons. In particular, surface roughness can influence formulation development and pharmaceutical performance for a wide range of delivery types including oral tablets and dry powder formulations for inhalation. For instance, the surface roughness can influence dissolution, friability, and adhesion of coatings and films for bare tablets (1–5). To illustrate, surface roughness correlated strongly with tablet friability for erythromycin acistrate tablets (3). The surface roughness has also been related to gloss and permeability, such that the reflectivity and surface texture of coated tablets were directly correlated (6,7). The surface roughness of particles also has been correlated to powder flow and powder packing (8), where the smoother particles led to an improvement of powder packing and flow properties. The adhesion of particles to surfaces or other particles can also be greatly affected by surface roughness. This is of particular concern for dry powder inhalation (DPI) formulation development. Dry powder formulations are often composed of small drug particles and inert larger carrier particles. Interactions between these particles can be dominated by physico-chemical properties of the particle, such as size, shape, morphology, contact area, and hygroscopicity (9,10). In particular, it has been shown that the surface roughness of the carrier particles has a significant impact on the adhesion and friction forces between the carrier and drug particles (11,12). Adhesion, blend homogeneity, and stability have been directly related to the surface roughness of the carrier particle (13). The ultimate performance properties of DPI blends as determined by in vitro testing has also been correlated to the primary particle surface roughness (13–15). There is an important balance between the relative scaling in the roughness of the particles and the relative size of the carrier and drug particles when considering the effects of surface roughness on particle–particle adhesion. This was previously described (16) and is illustrated by the schematic in Fig. 1. Assuming no other changes in particle properties (i.e., surface energy, particle size, amorphous content, hygroscopicity, etc.), the rank order of drug-carrier adhesion would obey the following trend in roughness of the larger carrier particle: macro-rough surface (Fig. 1a) > smooth surface (Fig. 1b) > micro-rough surface (Fig. 1c). This trend is strictly dependent on the contact area between drug and carrier. If adhesion is too weak, the active drug may be released during inhalation before the particles reach the deep lung. On the contrary, if adhesion is too strong, the active may not be released at all. This phenomenon has been observed and described in detail for several DPI studies (15–19). Fig. 1 Illustration of macro-roughness (a), smooth surface (b), and micro-roughness (c) affects on particle–particle contact and adhesion In this study, we focus on the measurement of micro-scale roughness using fractal dimensions determined from sorption isotherms with different adsorbates.

[1]  Peter Pfeifer,et al.  Chemistry in noninteger dimensions between two and three. I. Fractal theory of heterogeneous surfaces , 1983 .

[2]  P. Leterme,et al.  The influence of carrier roughness on adhesion, content uniformity and the in vitro deposition of terbutaline sulphate from dry powder inhalers. , 2004, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[3]  O. Antikainen,et al.  The effect of compression force on surface structure, crushing strength, friability and disintegration time of erythromycin acistrate tablets. , 1998, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[4]  F. Podczeck The Influence of Particle Size Distribution and Surface Roughness of Carrier Particles on the in vitro Properties of Dry Powder Inhalations , 1999 .

[5]  Peter Pfeifer,et al.  Molecular fractal surfaces , 1984, Nature.

[6]  C. Johnston,et al.  Measuring the surface area of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. , 2002, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[7]  Hiromitsu,et al.  Effect of Surface Morphology of Carrier Lactose on Dry Powder Inhalation Property of Pranlukast Hydrate. , 1998 .

[8]  J. Mcginity,et al.  Adhesion of polymeric films to pharmaceutical solids. , 1999, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[9]  B. D. Rohera,et al.  Influence of Plasticizer Type and Coat Level on Surelease® Film Properties , 2002, Pharmaceutical development and technology.

[10]  M. Spring,et al.  Roughness Model for Adhesion Testing of Pharmaceutical Coating Materials , 2007 .

[11]  R. Fassihi,et al.  A novel approach in the assessment of polymeric film formation and film adhesion on different pharmaceutical solid substrates , 2004, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[12]  Toru Suzuki,et al.  Fractal Structure Analysis of Some Food Materials , 1990 .

[13]  T. Reiland,et al.  Aqueous Gloss Solutions: Formula and Process Variables Effects on the Surface Texture of Film Coated Tablets , 1986 .

[14]  F. Ferrari,et al.  The surface roughness of lactose particles can be modulated by wet-smoothing using a high-shear mixer , 2004, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[15]  F. Podczeck Measurement of Surface Roughness of Tablets Made From Polyethylene Glycol Powders of Various Molecular Weight , 1998 .

[16]  F. Podczeck Adhesion forces in interactive powder mixtures of a micronized drug and carrier particles of various particle size distributions , 1998 .

[17]  M. Jaroniec,et al.  Surface fractal dimension of microporous carbon fibres by nitrogen adsorption , 1991 .

[18]  D. F. Steele,et al.  Characterization of a surface modified dry powder inhalation carrier prepared by “particle smoothing” , 2002, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[19]  H. Okamoto,et al.  Effects of surface processing of lactose carrier particles on dry powder inhalation properties of salbutamol sulfate. , 2004, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[20]  Slater,et al.  Review of dry powder inhalers. , 1997, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[21]  Fridrun Podczeck The relationship between particulate properties of carrier materials and the adhesion force of drug particles in interactive powder mixtures , 1997 .

[22]  Sibu Chakrabarti,et al.  Physical properties and compact analysis of commonly used direct compression binders , 2003, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[23]  Frank K. Pettit,et al.  Protein surface roughness and small molecular binding sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  E. Teller,et al.  ADSORPTION OF GASES IN MULTIMOLECULAR LAYERS , 1938 .

[25]  C. T. Chiou,et al.  Sorption of N2 and EGME vapors on some soils, clays, and mineral oxides and determination of sample surface areas by use of sorption data , 1993 .

[26]  H. Okamoto,et al.  Effect of surface layering time of lactose carrier particles on dry powder inhalation properties of salbutamol sulfate. , 2004, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin.