The limits of the attachment network

Abstract From the beginning, theories of attachment and caregiving have given rise to questions about minimum and maximum numbers of attachment figures. The child's tendency to direct attachment behavior to a specific figure rather than to whoever is nearby has led to the idea of monotropy, suggesting that a child would thrive best with one special attachment figure. From an evolutionary perspective kinship caregiving networks are more plausible as they would increase the chances of survival, and in hunter‐gatherer and agricultural communities paternal care and kinship networks providing care for young children were indeed common. A recent development in cultural evolution is the invention of organized day care and children's homes and institutions. Although the attachment network may increase in size with the child's cognitive development, research on institutionalized care demonstrates that high numbers of caregivers preclude secure attachments. The limiting factor to attachment networks may however not be the number of caregivers, but the opportunities for the child to learn contingencies in social relationships that have an attachment component.

[1]  M. Bakermans-Kranenburg,et al.  Replication crisis lost in translation? On translational caution and premature applications of attachment theory , 2021, Attachment & human development.

[2]  M. Bakermans-Kranenburg,et al.  ‘Tear down your institutions’. Empirical and evolutionary perspectives on institutional care in SOS Children’s Villages , 2021 .

[3]  R. Duschinsky.  Cornerstones of Attachment Research , 2020 .

[4]  Philip S. Goldman,et al.  Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children 1: a systematic and integrative review of evidence regarding effects on development. , 2020, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[5]  Chunling Lu,et al.  Prevalence and number of children living in institutional care: global, regional, and country estimates. , 2020, The Lancet. Child & adolescent health.

[6]  R. Mccall,et al.  The Genetic and Environmental Origins of Learning Abilities and Disabilities in the Early School , 2007, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[7]  H. Schaffer.  Attachment behaviour, separation anxiety, and stranger anxiety in polymatrically reared infants, from The Origins of Human , 2015 .

[8]  M. Gunnar,et al.  The emergence of attachment following early social deprivation , 2014, Development and Psychopathology.

[9]  Charles A. Nelson,et al.  Romania’s Abandoned Children: Deprivation, Brain Development, and the Struggle for Recovery , 2014 .

[10]  L. Billings.  Romania's abandoned children: Deprivation, brain development, and the struggle for recovery. , 2014 .

[11]  R. Mccall,et al.  I. CHILDREN IN INSTITUTIONAL CARE: DELAYED DEVELOPMENT AND RESILIENCE , 2011 .

[12]  M. Bakermans-Kranenburg,et al.  The importance of quality of care: effects of perinatal HIV infection and early institutional rearing on preschoolers' attachment and indiscriminate friendliness. , 2010, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[13]  C. Schuengel,et al.  Attachment behaviour towards support staff in young people with intellectual disabilities: associations with challenging behaviour. , 2010, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[14]  J. Belsky,et al.  Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. , 2010, Child development.

[15]  Mary Dozier,et al.  Forming attachments in foster care: Infant attachment behaviors during the first 2 months of placement , 2004, Development and Psychopathology.

[16]  Y. Ziv,et al.  Shedding further light on the effects of various types and quality of early child care on infant-mother attachment relationship: the Haifa Study of Early Child Care. , 2002, Child development.

[17]  C. Howes.  Attachment relationships in the context of multiple caregivers. , 1999 .

[18]  J. Cassidy.  The nature of the child's ties. , 1999 .

[19]  Bonnie Knoke,et al.  The Effects of Infant Child Care on Infant-Mother Attachment Security: Results of the NICHD Study of Early Child Care NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. , 1997, Child development.

[20]  Marinus H. van IJzendoorn,et al.  Sleeping out of home in a Kibbutz communal arrangement: it makes a difference for infant-mother attachment. , 1994, Child development.

[21]  Marinus H. van IJzendoorn,et al.  The multiple caretaker paradox: Data from Holland and Israel , 1992 .

[22]  M. Ainsworth.  Attachments beyond infancy. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[23]  Peter K. Smith.  SHARED CARE OF YOUNG CHILDREN: ALTERNATIVE MODELS TO MONOTROPISM , 1980 .

[24]  R. Gallimore,et al.  My Brother's Keeper: Child and Sibling Caretaking [and Comments and Reply] , 1977, Current Anthropology.

[25]  S. Hrdy.  Care and Exploitation of Nonhuman Primate Infants by Conspecifics Other Than the Mother , 1976 .

[26]  B. Tizard,et al.  The effect of early institutional rearing on the behaviour problems and affectional relationships of four-year-old children. , 1975, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[27]  H. Schaffer,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL ATTACHMENTS IN INFANCY. , 1964, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[28]  J. Bowlby,et al.  The nature of the child's tie to his mother. , 1958, The International journal of psycho-analysis.