The community question re-evaluated

Given its importance to human kind and accessibility to public discourse, it is a safe guess that the community question in some form will remain open to the end of time. Important transformations have taken place since World War II in scholarly approaches to the question. Systematic efforts to gather data have supplanted armchair theorizing. New ways of studying local social bistortes have demythologiZed notions of stable pastoral villages. Network analysis has freed the community question from its traditional preoccupation with solidarity and neighbourhood. The broad shift towards structural analysis in the social sciences has created possibilities for the integration of the community question with studies of the family, household, and personal health. The development of political economic thought has made salient questions about how relations of power and dependency in large-scale social systems engender and reflect interpersonal relationships of cooperation and power . ... ... • This is a slightly revised version of a paper appealing in the inaugural 1987 volume of Comparative Urban and Community Research, an annual review edited by Michael Peter Smith and published by Transaction Pertodicals Consortium (New Brunswick NJ 08903). THE COMMUNITY QUESTION RE-EVALUATED! Looking for Community "Things ain't wot they used to be" the music hall song laments. Contemporary urbanites perversely flatter themselves by remarking how stressful are modern times. They fear that .communities have fallen apart, with loneliness and alienation leading to a war of all against all. They are sure that their preindustrial ancestors led charmed lives when they could bathe 1n the warmth of true solidary community. A large part of the fear comes from a selective perception of the present. Many urbanites think they are witnessing loneliness when they observe people walking or driving by themselves. Mass media quickly and graphically circulate news about New York subway attacks and Parisian bombings. The public generalizes its fears the attack could take place next door tomorrowand ahistorically forgets to compare contemporary crime and political violence rates with the past. Paradoxically, few urbanites will confess to living lives of lonely desperation. They know that they have supportive communities, and that their friends. neighbours, kin and coworkers have them as well. Yet each person believes that he or she is the exception: it is the vast hordes out there in the "mass society" who are lonely and isolated. At the same time, nostalgia for the perfect pastoral past dims awareness of the powerful stresses and cleavages that have always pervaded human society. The inhabitants of almost all contemporary societies have less to worry about than their predecessors with respect to the basics of human life. People now are likely to eat better, be better housed and clothed, suffer less personal and property crime, live longer, and see their loved ones live longer. In their concern about current problems, people often forget about the ones that are no more. AIDS does not appear to rival the Black Death; automobile pollution is more benign than knee-deep horse manure.

[1]  P. Greenbaum,et al.  Territorial Personalization , 1981 .

[2]  S. Feld.  The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Melvin L. Oliver.  THE URBAN BLACK COMMUNITY AS NETWORK: TOWARD A SOCIAL NETWORK PERSPECTIVE , 1988 .

[4]  L. Verbrugge.  The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices , 1977 .

[5]  M. Weber.  From Max Weber: Essays in sociology , 1946 .

[6]  S. D. Clark.  The Suburban Society , 1966 .

[7]  R. Kessler,et al.  Sex differences in vulnerability to undesirable life events. , 1984 .

[8]  Susan Greenbaum,et al.  BRIDGING TIES AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD LEVEL , 1982 .

[9]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[10]  K. Marx.  A Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy , 1859 .

[11]  C. Tilly.  From mobilization to revolution , 1978 .

[12]  John Brunner,et al.  Stand on Zanzibar , 1968 .

[13]  C. Fischer.  To Dwell Among Friends , 1982 .

[14]  Raymond Williams.  The Country and the City , 1973 .

[15]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Social support : theory, research and applications , 1985 .

[16]  R. Brym.  The Jewish intelligentsia and Russian Marxism , 1978 .

[17]  Herbert J. Gans,et al.  The Urban Villagers , 1962 .

[18]  Lisa Redfield Peattie,et al.  The View from the Barrio , 1968 .

[19]  Karen E. Campbell,et al.  SOCIAL RESOURCES AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS , 1986 .

[20]  S. H. Aronson,et al.  Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in a Nineteenth Century City. , 1966 .

[21]  B. Roberts.  Organizing Strangers: Poor Families in Guatemala City , 1973 .

[22]  Barry Wellman.  Studying personal communities in East York , 1982 .

[23]  Melvin M. Webber,et al.  The Urban Place and the Nonplace Urban Realm , 1964 .

[24]  Frans Stokman,et al.  Networks of Corporate Power , 1985 .

[25]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network items and the general social survey , 1984 .

[26]  Michael Schwartz,et al.  The Power Structure of American Business. , 1986 .

[27]  R. Burt.  Models of Network Structure , 1980 .

[28]  Peter Willmott,et al.  Friendship Networks and Social Support , 1987 .

[29]  B. Wellman,et al.  From Social Support to Social Network , 1985 .

[30]  Loredana Cornero,et al.  Women , 1893, The Hospital.

[31]  Lf Berkman.  Social networks, host resistance, and mortality , 1979 .

[32]  N. Shulman.  Network Analysis: A New Addition to an Old Bag of Tricks , 1976 .

[33]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  A note on sociometric order in the general social survey network data , 1986 .

[34]  John Brunner,et al.  Shockwave Rider , 1975 .

[35]  Nadine Gordimer,et al.  A World of Strangers , 1958 .

[36]  B. Wellman.  Network Analysis: Some Basic Principles , 1983 .

[37]  Melvin L. Oliver.  Beyond the Neighborhood: The Spatial Distribution of Social Ties in Three Urban Black Communities , 1986 .

[38]  M. Minkler,et al.  Social support and health. , 1982, Patient education newsletter.

[39]  C. H. Tardy,et al.  Social support measurement , 1985 .

[40]  Michael Peter Smith,et al.  The City and Social Theory , 1980 .

[41]  Charles E. Connerly.  The Community Question , 1985 .

[42]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  The Urban Experience , 1976 .

[43]  C. Tilly.  Collective Violence in European Perspective , 1978 .

[44]  M. Hammer,et al.  'Core' and 'extended' social networks in relation to health and illness. , 1983, Social science & medicine.

[45]  G. Wills,et al.  Inventing America: Jefferson's Declaration of Independence. , 1979 .

[46]  C. Kadushin,et al.  The Friends and Supporters of Psychotherapy: on social circles in urban life. , 1966, American sociological review.

[47]  R. Hodson,et al.  Social Mobility in a Mid-Nineteenth Century French City , 1982 .

[48]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[49]  Edythe S. Miller.  Women’s Claims , 1985 .

[50]  C. Hogg,et al.  Family and Kinship in East London , 1957, Mental Health.

[51]  G. Darroch,et al.  Family Coresidence in Canada in 1871: Family Life‑Cycles, Occupations and Networks of Mutual Aid , 1983 .

[52]  Natalie Zemon Davis,et al.  The Return of Martin Guerre , 1983 .

[53]  Richard M. Titmuss,et al.  The gift relationship , 1970 .