A re-examination of local contrast in multiple schedules.

Pigeons were presented with multiple schedules of alternating 90-sec components. When components in which grain was never presented alternated with components in which grain was presented on a variable-interval schedule, the average rate of responding in the variable-interval components increased, showing overall positive behavioral contrast. Unlike previous reports, this study found that the response rates for all birds increased toward the end of the variable-interval components as training proceeded. This increase in local response rate disappeared when the multiple schedule was composed solely of variable-interval components and reappeared when the variable-interval components were again alternated with extinction. This finding cannot be predicted or explained by recent theories of behavioral contrast based on autoshaping, and thus questions their sufficiency. We suggest that this local response-rate increase results from the predictable change from high to low density of reinforcement at the end of the fixed-duration component. Thus, the present effect apparently illustrates a different type of interaction between components of a multiple schedule than that described by previous theories of contrast. In a given procedure, either or both types of interaction may occur; neither provides a complete account of behavioral contrast.

[1]  H S HOFFMAN,et al.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  H. Rachlin Contrast and Matching. , 1973 .

[3]  Dale M. Brethower,et al.  A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  J A Nevin,et al.  An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  S. Pliskoff RATE-CHANGE EFFECTS WITH EQUAL POTENTIAL REINFORCEMENTS DURING THE "WARNING" STIMULUS. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  B. Williams The role of local interactions in behavioral contrast , 1974 .

[7]  S PLISKOFF,et al.  Rate-change effects during a pre-schedule-change stimulus. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  K L Wheatley,et al.  Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  F B Arnett,et al.  A local-rate-of-response and interresponse-time analysis of behavioral contrast. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  On some causes of behavioral contrast. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  R. Wilton,et al.  Behavioral contrast in one component of a multiple schedule as a function of the reinforcement conditions operating in the following component. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  B. Schwartz,et al.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.