Chaotic feature analysis and forecasting of Liujiang River runoff

Because most of runoff time series with limited amount of data reveal inherently nonlinear and stochastic characteristics and tend to show chaotic behavior, strategies based on chaotic analysis are popular methods to analyze them from real systems in nonlinear dynamics. Only one kind of predicted method for yearly rainfall-runoff forecasting cannot achieve perfect performance. Thus, a mixture strategy denoted by WT-PSR-GA-NN, which is composed of wavelet transform (WT), phase space reconstruction (PSR), neural network (NN) and genetic algorithm (GA), is presented in this paper. In the WT-PSR-GA-NN framework, the process to deal with time series gathered from Liujiang River runoff data is given as follows: (1) the runoff time series was first decomposed into low-frequency and high-frequency sub-series by wavelet transformation; (2) the two sub-series were separately and independently reconstructed into phase spaces; (3) the transformed time series in the reconstructed phase spaces were modeled by neural network, which is trained by genetic algorithm to avoid trapping into local minima; (4) the predicted results in low-frequency parts were combined with the ones of high-frequency parts, and reconstructed with wavelet inverse transformation, to form the future behavior of the runoff. Experiments show that WT-PSR-GA-NN is effective and its forecasting results are high in accuracy not only for the short-term yearly hydrological time series but also for the long-term one. The comparison results revealed that the overall forecasting performance of WT-PSR-GA-NN proposed by us is superior to other popularity methods for all the test cases. We can conclude that WT-PSR-GA-NN can not only increase the forecasted accuracy, but also its own competitiveness in efficiency, effectiveness and robustness.

[1]  H. Millán,et al.  Temporal complexity of daily precipitation records from different atmospheric environments: Chaotic and Lévy stable parameters , 2011 .

[2]  Yan-Fang Sang,et al.  A Practical Guide to Discrete Wavelet Decomposition of Hydrologic Time Series , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[3]  Ding Jing Characteristics of daily flow variation in the Yangtze River,1, optimum determination of delay time for reconstruction of a phase space , 2003 .

[4]  A. W. Minns,et al.  Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models , 1996 .

[5]  Driss Ouazar,et al.  Evolving neural network using real coded genetic algorithm for daily rainfall-runoff forecasting , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  金龙,et al.  STUDY ON THE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION MODEL USING THE LEARNING ALGORITHM OF NEURAL ENSEMBLE BASED ON PSO ALGORITHMS , 2009 .

[7]  Shouchun Wang,et al.  Design of artificial neural networks using a genetic algorithm to predict saturates of vacuum gas oil , 2010 .

[8]  Yang Jie Wavelet transformation combined neural network based on genetic algorithm for runoff prediction , 2012 .

[9]  Hojjat Ahmadi,et al.  Prediction of Daily Pan Evaporation using Wavelet Neural Networks , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[10]  T. Partal Wavelet analysis and multi‐scale characteristics of the runoff and precipitation series of the Aegean region (Turkey) , 2012 .

[11]  Wei Huang,et al.  The Shortest Path Problem on a Fuzzy Time-Dependent Network , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  Xu Jian-hua,et al.  Long-term trend and fractal of annual runoff process in mainstream of Tarim River , 2008 .

[13]  A. Tokar,et al.  Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1999 .

[14]  Wensheng Wang,et al.  Wavelet Network Model and Its Application to the Prediction of Hydrology , 2003 .

[15]  Dong Wen Convergence and Runtime Analysis of ITO Algorithm for One Class of Combinatorial Optimization , 2011 .

[16]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Two hybrid Artificial Intelligence approaches for modeling rainfall–runoff process , 2011 .

[17]  R. Maheswaran,et al.  Wavelet–Volterra coupled model for monthly stream flow forecasting , 2012 .

[18]  Hans C. van Houwelingen,et al.  Cross-Validation, Shrinkage and Variable Selection in Linear Regression Revisited , 2013 .

[19]  Bellie Sivakumar,et al.  Measuring nonlinear dependence in hydrologic time series , 2009 .

[20]  Magnus Persson,et al.  Monthly runoff prediction using phase space reconstruction , 2001 .

[21]  Alexandre Evsukoff,et al.  A multi-model approach for long-term runoff modeling using rainfall forecasts , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  M. Rosenstein,et al.  A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets , 1993 .

[23]  Chen,et al.  Mechanical Properties Prediction of the Mechanical Clinching Joints Based on Genetic Algorithm and BP Neural Network , 2009 .

[24]  S. Peng,et al.  Partial least squares and random sample consensus in outlier detection. , 2012, Analytica chimica acta.

[25]  Kwok-Wing Chau,et al.  Data-driven models for monthly streamflow time series prediction , 2010, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[26]  Jianhua Xu,et al.  Long-term trend and fractal of annual runoff process in mainstream of Tarim River , 2008 .

[27]  Ju Rui Yang,et al.  The Prediction Model of Chaotic Series Based on Support Vector Machine and its Application to Runoff , 2011 .

[28]  Fi-John Chang,et al.  Evolutionary artificial neural networks for hydrological systems forecasting , 2009 .

[29]  Jun Li,et al.  Mutual information algorithms , 2010 .