Interpreting Trace Evidence

[1]  Claude Roux,et al.  Fibre transfer experiments onto car seats , 1996 .

[2]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  A Bayesian approach to interpreting footwear marks in forensic casework , 1998 .

[3]  Robert D. Koons,et al.  Classification and Discrimination of Sheet and Container Glasses by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry and Pattern Recognition , 1988 .

[4]  Michael O. Finkelstein,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence , 1970 .

[5]  Claude Roux,et al.  The population of textile fibres on car seats , 1997 .

[6]  Ian Watkins,et al.  Perception problems of the verbal scale: A reanalysis and application of a membership function approach. , 2015, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[7]  G. Jackson,et al.  The scientist and the Scales of Justice , 2000 .

[8]  P. L. Kirk.  Criminalistics: A new and independent discipline evolves from modern techniques and new concepts of individualization , 1963 .

[9]  K Lunstroot,et al.  Fibre persistence on immersed garment-Influence of knitted recipient fabrics. , 2015, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[10]  T. Biermann,et al.  The individuality of fibres used to provide forensic evidence--not all blue polyesters are the same. , 2005, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[11]  Michael C. Grieve,et al.  An Assessment of the Value of Blue, Red, and Black Cotton Fibers as Target Fibers in Forensic Science Investigations , 1988 .

[12]  James Robertson.  Forensic Examination of Hair , 1999 .

[13]  Candice Bridge,et al.  Forensic comparative glass analysis by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy , 2007 .

[14]  B. Newell,et al.  On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[15]  Scott Ryland,et al.  The Evidential Value of Automobile Paint Chips , 1979 .

[16]  Nicole M Egli,et al.  Survey of crowbar and household paints in burglary cases-population studies, transfer and interpretation. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[17]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Some aspects of the Bayesian approach to evidence evaluation , 1989 .

[18]  Michael E Sigman,et al.  Assessing the evidentiary value of smokeless powder comparisons. , 2016, Forensic science international.

[19]  J A Gothard,et al.  Evaluation of automobile paint flakes as evidence. , 1976, Journal of forensic sciences.

[20]  Nenagh Kemp,et al.  The readability of expert reports for non-scientist report-users: reports of forensic comparison of glass. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[21]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Establishing the evidential value of a small quantity of material found at a crime scene , 1993 .

[22]  F Taroni,et al.  Statistical hypothesis testing and common misinterpretations: Should we abandon p-value in forensic science applications? , 2016, Forensic science international.

[23]  Jack Wallace,et al.  Ten methods for calculating the uncertainty of measurement. , 2010, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[24]  C. Aitken,et al.  De Finetti's subjectivism, the assessment of probabilities and the evaluation of evidence: a commentary for forensic scientists , 2001 .

[25]  Pierre Esseiva,et al.  Discrimination and classification of FTIR spectra of red, blue and green spray paints using a multivariate statistical approach. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[26]  D A Stoney,et al.  What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics? , 1991, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[27]  W. Thompson,et al.  Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials , 1987 .

[28]  D. Stoney,et al.  Evaluation of Associative Evidence: Choosing the Relevant Question , 1984 .

[29]  Kirk Pl,et al.  EVIDENCE EVALUATION AND PROBLEMS IN GENERAL CRIMINALISTICS. , 1964 .

[30]  Michael C. Grieve,et al.  A practical aspect of the Bayesian interpretation of fibre evidence , 1992 .

[31]  David A. Stoney.  Relaxation of the assumption of relevance and an application to one-trace and two-trace problems , 1994 .

[32]  J. Goodpaster,et al.  Identification and Comparison of Electrical Tapes Using Instrumental and Statistical Techniques: II. Organic Composition of the Tape Backing and Adhesive * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[33]  David Lindley,et al.  A problem in forensic science , 1977 .

[34]  Tacha Hicks,et al.  Forensic Interpretation of Glass Evidence , 2000 .

[35]  B. Newell,et al.  The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions , 2013 .

[36]  R. Morgan,et al.  An experimental investigation of the indirect transfer and deposition of gunshot residue: further studies carried out with SEM-EDX analysis. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[37]  I. Evett,et al.  More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[38]  Alex Biedermann,et al.  Modeling the forensic two-trace problem with Bayesian networks , 2012, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[39]  S. Pitts,et al.  Statistical Discrimination of Flat Glass Fragments by Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis Methods for Forensic Science Applications , 1991 .

[40]  Jaap van der Weerd,et al.  Towards source level evaluation of the evidential value of fibre examinations. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[41]  T. Biermann.  Blocks of colour IV: the evidential value of blue and red cotton fibres. , 2007, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[42]  Maureen J. Bradley,et al.  Analysis and Discrimination of Electrical Tapes: Part II. Backings *,† , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[43]  F Taroni,et al.  Decision theoretic properties of forensic identification: underlying logic and argumentative implications. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[44]  P. Esseiva,et al.  The application of chemometrics on Infrared and Raman spectra as a tool for the forensic analysis of paints. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[45]  Maureen J. Bradley,et al.  Analysis and discrimination of architectural paint samples via a population study. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[46]  D. K. Laing,et al.  THE DISCRIMINATION OF SMALL FRAGMENTS OF HOUSEHOLD GLOSS PAINT BY MICROSPECTROPHOTOMETRY , 1982 .

[47]  J. Almirall,et al.  Analysis and comparison of glass fragments by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and ICP-MS , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[48]  J. Goodpaster,et al.  Identification and Comparison of Electrical Tapes Using Instrumental and Statistical Techniques: I. Microscopic Surface Texture and Elemental Composition * , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[49]  Tacha Hicks,et al.  Transfer and persistence of glass fragments on garments , 1996 .

[50]  J A Lambert,et al.  A model for case assessment and interpretation. , 1998, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[51]  Richard Gott,et al.  Understanding and Using Scientific Evidence , 2003 .

[52]  G. Cooper.  The indirect transfer of glass fragments to a jacket and their subsequent persistence. , 2013, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[53]  L. Moxey,et al.  Perception problems of the verbal scale. , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[54]  K W Smalldon,et al.  The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear. Part I--Fibre transference. , 1975, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[56]  T. Biermann,et al.  The occurrence and individuality of orange and green cotton fibres , 2003 .

[57]  T. Biermann,et al.  The population of coloured textile fibres on outdoor surfaces , 1997 .

[58]  G. Massonnet,et al.  A market study of green spray paints by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy. , 2004, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[59]  T. Biermann,et al.  The evidential value of black cotton fibres. , 2001, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[60]  Colin Aitken,et al.  Bayesian Networks for Probabilistic Inference and Decision Analysis in Forensic Science , 2014 .

[61]  C Champod,et al.  Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions. , 2004, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[62]  Dennis V. Lindley,et al.  Understanding Uncertainty: Lindley/Understanding Uncertainty , 2006 .

[63]  K W Smalldon,et al.  The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear. Part III--a preliminary investigation of the mechanisms involved. , 1975, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[64]  I. Evett,et al.  A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework , 1998 .

[65]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  On meaningful questions: a two-trace transfer problem , 1987 .

[66]  J A Lambert,et al.  The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[67]  José R. Almirall,et al.  A comparison of laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, and laser induced breakdown spectroscopy for the discrimination of automotive glass , 2008 .

[68]  A. Biedermann,et al.  The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions. , 2015, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[69]  A. Maehly,et al.  The Discrimination Between Samples of Window Glass by Combining Physical and Chemical Techniques , 1978 .

[70]  Matthew Grima,et al.  An assessment of firework particle persistence on the hands and related police force practices in relation to GSR evidence. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[71]  Alex Biedermann,et al.  Graphical probabilistic analysis of the combination of items of evidence , 2012 .

[72]  R W May,et al.  An evaluation of common methods of paint analysis. , 1975, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[73]  The Analysis of Colored Acrylic, Cotton, and Wool Textile Fibers Using Micro‐Raman Spectroscopy. Part 2: Comparison with the Traditional Methods of Fiber Examination , 2015, Journal of forensic sciences.

[74]  A Richardson,et al.  The evidential value of the comparison of paint flakes from sources other than vehicles. , 1968, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[75]  I. Evett,et al.  Evidence evaluation: a response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T. , 2011, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[76]  Wilkaan Fong,et al.  Results of a Study to Determine the Probability of Chance Match Occurrences Between Fibers Known to be from Different Sources , 1986 .

[77]  K. Danzer,et al.  Selectivity in analytical chemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 2001) , 2001 .

[78]  G. Edmondstone,et al.  An Assessment of the Evidential Value of Automotive Paint Comparisons , 2004 .

[79]  Maureen J. Bradley,et al.  Analysis and Discrimination of Electrical Tapes: Part I. Adhesives *,† , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[80]  Edward Chip Pollock,et al.  Forensic analysis of glass by μ-XRF, SN-ICP-MS, LA-ICP-MS and LA-ICP-OES: evaluation of the performance of different criteria for comparing elemental composition , 2013 .

[81]  C M Triggs,et al.  The two trace transfer problem re-examined. , 2003, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[82]  R. Palmer,et al.  The discrimination of (non-denim) blue cotton. , 2009, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[84]  D. F. Nelson,et al.  Backward Fragmentation from Breaking Glass , 1967 .

[85]  L. Lepot,et al.  Fibre persistence on immersed garment - Influence of water flow and stay in running water. , 2015, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[86]  P. L. Kirk,et al.  The Ontogeny of Criminalistics , 1963 .

[87]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Avoiding the transposed conditional , 1995 .

[88]  F. Govaert,et al.  Discriminating red spray paints by optical microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray fluorescence. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[89]  Alex Biedermann,et al.  Evidential relevance in scene to offender transfer cases: development and analysis of a likelihood ratio for offence level propositions , 2011 .

[90]  C. Aitken,et al.  Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists: Aitken/Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists , 2005 .

[91]  A C Moffat,et al.  The calculation of discriminating power for a series of correlated attributes. , 1973, Journal - Forensic Science Society.