A case study analysis of a sophisticated sports doping network: Lance Armstrong and the USPS Team

Abstract While doping in professional sport is not new, this analysis of professional cyclist Lance Armstrong and his US Postal Service (USPS) Team and associates provides additional insight into the key attributes of a sophisticated and resilient doping network. Using network analysis software the entities, events and activities of this network are examined in detail. The paper discusses the similarities between criminal networks and sophisticated sports doping networks within the context of the Tour de France. It highlights the critical elements of this resilient dark network and the strategies it employed to facilitate illicit activities and avoid detection and prosecution for more than a decade. By examining doping-related sports activities from a network perspective, this research provides insight into the resilience, vulnerabilities and indicators of such networks.

[1]  B. Brewer,et al.  Commercialization in Professional Cycling , 2002 .

[2]  R. K. Müller.  History of doping and doping control. , 2010, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

[3]  Julie Ayling,et al.  Criminal organizations and resilience , 2009 .

[4]  R. Hulst.  Introduction to Social Network Analysis (SNA) as an investigative tool , 2009 .

[5]  Steven R. Thomsen,et al.  Using the Rhetoric of Atonement to Analyze Lance Armstrong’s Failed Attempt at Redeeming His Public Image , 2015 .

[6]  H. Nixon.  A Social Network Analysys of Influences On Athletes To Play With Pain and Injuries , 1992 .

[7]  R. Keast,et al.  The network approach to evaluation: uncovering patterns, possibilities and pitfalls , 2005 .

[8]  R. Keast,et al.  Social network analysis of terrorist networks: can it add value? , 2012 .

[9]  Terry Engelberg,et al.  Athletes’ and coaches’ perceptions of deterrents to performance-enhancing drug use , 2015 .

[10]  Philip L. Reichel.  Handbook of Transnational Crime and Justice , 2004 .

[11]  Tamás Nepusz,et al.  Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology Comfort in Big Numbers: Does Over-estimation of Doping Prevalence in Others Indicate Self-involvement? , 2008 .

[12]  H. Milward,et al.  Dark Networks as Problems , 2003 .

[13]  Chris Davies.  Doping in sport: from Lance Armstrong to the AFL and NRL , 2013 .

[14]  Albert D Fraser,et al.  Doping Control from a Global and National Perspective , 2004, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[15]  Rene M. Bakker,et al.  A preliminary theory of dark network resilience , 2012 .

[16]  P. Duret,et al.  Le dopage dans le cyclisme professionnel : accusations, confessions et dénégations , 2003 .

[17]  S. Borgatti.  The Key Player Problem , 2002 .

[18]  Valdis E. Krebs,et al.  Mapping Networks of Terrorist Cells , 2001 .

[19]  Martin Bouchard,et al.  On the Resilience of Illegal Drug Markets , 2007 .

[20]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  Law-Enforcement Disruption of a Drug Importation Network , 2006 .

[21]  Robert M. Clark,et al.  Intelligence Analysis: A Target-Centric Approach , 2003 .

[22]  S. Everton,et al.  Tracking, Destabilizing and Disrupting Dark Networks with Social Networks Analysis , 2008 .

[23]  Doping: Athletes And Drugs , 2012 .

[24]  Patrick Mignon,et al.  The Tour de France and the doping issue , 2003 .

[25]  Antoni Calvó-Armengol,et al.  Centre De Referència En Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper Nº 178 Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Barcelona Economics Wp Nº 178 , 2022 .

[26]  V. Lentillon‐Kaestner,et al.  The socialization of young cyclists and the culture of doping , 2015 .

[27]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[28]  Siddharth Kaza,et al.  Identifying significant facilitators of dark network evolution , 2009 .

[29]  P. Sönksen,et al.  The history of doping and growth hormone abuse in sport. , 2009, Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society.

[30]  Nigel Coles,et al.  It's Not What You Know-It's Who You Know that Counts. Analysing Serious Crime Groups as Social Networks , 2001 .

[31]  Harm Kuipers,et al.  Prevalence of Doping Use in Elite Sports: A Review of Numbers and Methods , 2014, Sports Medicine.

[32]  R. Keast,et al.  Resilience of a corrupt police network: the first and second jokes in Queensland , 2012 .

[33]  Terry Engelberg,et al.  The final frontier of anti-doping: A study of athletes who have committed doping violations , 2015 .

[34]  V. Lentillon‐Kaestner,et al.  Doping use among young elite cyclists: a qualitative psychosociological approach , 2009, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[35]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[36]  J. Raab,et al.  Dark Networks as Organizational Problems: Elements of a Theory 1 , 2006 .

[37]  P. Dimeo.  Why Lance Armstrong? Historical Context and Key Turning Points in the ‘Cleaning Up’ of Professional Cycling , 2014 .

[38]  M. Zabala,et al.  Spanish cycling and attitudes towards doping of different stakeholders involved , 2014 .

[39]  W. Bernasco,et al.  Criminal groups and transnational illegal markets , 2004 .

[40]  F. Ohl,et al.  The genesis and effect of French anti-doping policies in cycling , 2010 .

[41]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  G. Ninot,et al.  Motives for Illicit Use of Doping Substances Among Athletes Calling a National Antidoping Phone-Help Service: An Exploratory Study , 2011, Substance use & misuse.

[43]  L. Paoli,et al.  The Sports Doping Market , 2014 .

[44]  Hamish McLean,et al.  Social media in Crisis Communication: What can we learn from elite sport? , 2014 .

[45]  J. Cooke.  Doping and free speech. , 2007 .

[46]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[47]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  “Legitimate Strengths in Criminal Networks” , 2006 .