Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences

Collective decision-making plays a central part in the lives of many social animals. Two important factors that influence collective decision-making are information uncertainty and conflicting preferences. Here, I bring together, and briefly review, basic models relating to animal collective decision-making in situations with information uncertainty and in situations with conflicting preferences between group members. The intention is to give an overview about the different types of modelling approaches that have been employed and the questions that they address and raise. Despite the use of a wide range of different modelling techniques, results show a coherent picture, as follows. Relatively simple cognitive mechanisms can lead to effective information pooling. Groups often face a trade-off between decision accuracy and speed, but appropriate fine-tuning of behavioural parameters could achieve high accuracy while maintaining reasonable speed. The right balance of interdependence and independence between animals is crucial for maintaining group cohesion and achieving high decision accuracy. In conflict situations, a high degree of decision-sharing between individuals is predicted, as well as transient leadership and leadership according to needs and physiological status. Animals often face crucial trade-offs between maintaining group cohesion and influencing the decision outcome in their own favour. Despite the great progress that has been made, there remains one big gap in our knowledge: how do animals make collective decisions in situations when information uncertainty and conflict of interest operate simultaneously?

[1]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  Naïve heuristics for paired comparisons: Some results on their relative accuracy , 2006 .

[2]  G. Parisi,et al.  Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[4]  Christian List,et al.  Independence and interdependence in collective decision making: an agent-based model of nest-site choice by honeybee swarms , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  C. List,et al.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  O. Petit,et al.  Decision-making in group departures of female domestic geese , 2009 .

[7]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing , 2006, Current Biology.

[8]  Hisashi Kobayashi,et al.  Modeling and analysis , 1978 .

[9]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Modulation of trail laying in the antLasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source , 1993, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[10]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  I. Couzin Collective minds , 2007, Nature.

[12]  T. Seeley,et al.  Nest-site selection in honey bees: how well do swarms implement the "best-of-N" decision rule? , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  S. Pratt,et al.  A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Nigel R Franks,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in decision-making ants: expediting politics and policy implementation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  I. Couzin,et al.  “Leading According to Need” in Self‐Organizing Groups , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Dominance and Affiliation Mediate Despotism in a Social Primate , 2008, Current Biology.

[17]  K. Ruckstuhl,et al.  Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses , 2002, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[18]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[19]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Where Next? Group Coordination and Collective Decision Making by Primates , 2011, International Journal of Primatology.

[20]  Ilya R. Fischhoff,et al.  Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  J. Krause,et al.  Relationship between the position preference and nutritional state of individuals in schools of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  L. Conradt,et al.  Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminants? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  J. Poole,et al.  Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  J. Black Preflight Signalling in Swans: A Mechanism for Group Cohesion and Flock Formation , 2010 .

[25]  H. G. Wallraff Social interrelations involved in migratory orientation of birds: Possible contribution of field studies , 1978 .

[26]  Claudia Fichtel,et al.  Coordination of Group Movements in Wild Verreaux's Sifakas (Propithecus Verreauxi) , 2004 .

[27]  R. Holley,et al.  Ergodic Theorems for Weakly Interacting Infinite Systems and the Voter Model , 1975 .

[28]  Stefan Krause,et al.  Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Collective patterns and decision-making , 1989 .

[30]  Andrew J. King,et al.  All together now: behavioural synchrony in baboons , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  E A Codling,et al.  Group navigation and the "many-wrongs principle" in models of animal movement. , 2007, Ecology.

[33]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  From the first intention movement to the last joiner: macaques combine mimetic rules to optimize their collective decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  S. Pellis,et al.  Interspecific variation in antipredator behaviour leads to differential vulnerability of mule deer and white‐tailed deer fawns early in life , 2005 .

[35]  S. Pratt,et al.  Quorum responses and consensus decision making , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  H. Prins,et al.  Ecology and Behaviour of the African Buffalo , 1996, Chapman & Hall Wildlife Ecology and Behaviour Series.

[37]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the argentine ant , 1990, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[38]  Andrea Manica,et al.  Evolution of personality differences in leadership , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[40]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Collective decision making in cohesive flocks , 2010, 1007.4453.

[41]  David Austen-Smith,et al.  Information aggregation and communication in committees , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Group movement decisions in capuchin monkeys: The utility of an experimental study and a mathematical model to explore the relationship between individual and collective behaviours , 2007, q-bio/0702023.

[43]  P. Fennessy Red deer—behaviour and ecology of two sexes , 1984 .

[44]  O. Petit,et al.  Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques? , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[45]  I. Couzin,et al.  Consensus decision making in human crowds , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Group decision-making in animals , 2003, Nature.

[47]  Aimee F. Campbell,et al.  Use of Trill Vocalizations To Coordinate Troop Movement Among White-Faced Capuchins: a Second Field Test , 1995 .

[48]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[49]  D. Helbing,et al.  Leadership, consensus decision making and collective behaviour in humans , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  D. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[51]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Swarm Intelligence in Animal Groups: When Can a Collective Out-Perform an Expert? , 2010, PloS one.

[52]  Elisabeth Schulte Information aggregation and preference heterogeneity in committees , 2010 .

[53]  Andrew M Simons,et al.  Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[54]  W I Sellers,et al.  An agent-based model of group decision making in baboons , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  David Lusseau,et al.  The emergence of unshared consensus decisions in bottlenose dolphins , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[56]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in swarms of honey bees , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[57]  A. Loudon Red Deer: Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes, T.H. Clutton-Brock, F.E. Guinness, S.D. Albon. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1982), xxii, + 378 Price £20.10 hardback, £9.75 paperback , 1983 .

[58]  Sean A. Rands,et al.  Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs , 2003, Nature.

[59]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Democracy in animals: the evolution of shared group decisions , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  T. Seeley,et al.  Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms: the speed and accuracy trade-off , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[61]  L. Conradt,et al.  Deciding group movements: Where and when to go , 2010, Behavioural Processes.

[62]  José Halloy,et al.  Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes , 1992 .

[64]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  Self-Organized Fish Schools: An Examination of Emergent Properties , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[65]  M. Manser,et al.  Resolution of experimentally induced symmetrical conflicts of interest in meerkats , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[66]  Jens Krause,et al.  The relationship between foraging and shoal position in a mixed shoal of roach (Rutilus rutilus) and chub (Leuciscus cephalus): a field study , 1993, Oecologia.

[67]  Ruckstuhl TO SYNCHRONISE OR NOT TO SYNCHRONISE: A DILEMMA FOR YOUNG BIGHORN MALES? , 1999 .

[68]  Larissa Conradt,et al.  Conflicts of interest and the evolution of decision sharing , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  S. G. Reebs Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal? , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[70]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[71]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-Organized Shape and Frontal Density of Fish Schools , 2008 .

[72]  Michael R. Heithaus,et al.  Highly dynamic fission–fusion species can exhibit leadership when traveling , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[73]  Daniel W. Franks,et al.  The impact of social networks on animal collective motion , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[74]  A. Harcourt,et al.  Gorillas' Vocalizations During Rest Periods: Signals of Impending Departure? , 1994 .

[75]  S. Hix,et al.  Voting patterns and alliance formation in the European Parliament , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[76]  E. Despland,et al.  Group leadership depends on energetic state in a nomadic collective foraging caterpillar , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[77]  B. Thierry,et al.  Decision making in group departures of sheep is a continuous process , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[78]  Christian List,et al.  Democracy in animal groups: a political science perspective. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[79]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[80]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[81]  Cornelia Ebert,et al.  Group decision making in fission–fusion societies: evidence from two-field experiments in Bechstein's bats , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[82]  K. Ruckstuhl,et al.  SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN UNGULATES: A NEW APPROACH , 2000 .

[83]  M. Gompper Sociality and asociality in white-nosed coatis (Nasua narica): foraging costs and benefits , 1996 .

[84]  Iva Dostálková,et al.  Synchronization of behaviour in pairs: the role of communication and consequences in timing , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[85]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Collective decision‐making and fission–fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework , 2011 .