Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors.

The thickness of the human masseter muscle, corresponding approximately to a cross-section at the most bulky part of the superficial portion, was measured by ultrasound scanning at three sites 1 cm apart. The study included 13 women, 21-28 yr of age, with a minimum of 24 teeth and without craniomandibular disorders. Ultrasonography produced a well-defined depiction of the muscle with distinct tendinous structures. The average thickness at the measuring sites varied from 8.83 to 11.08 mm with the muscle relaxed, and increased significantly during contraction to average values between 9.84 and 12.57 mm. The study showed a connection between measures of masseter thickness and function of the muscle, as well as parameters generally associated with masseter muscle function. Muscle thickness at the voluminous anterior part of the superficial portion was systematically and significantly correlated to bite force, occlusal tooth contact and cephalometric data (anterior face height, vertical jaw relation and mandibular inclination). In conclusion, ultrasound scanning gave an uncomplicated and a reproducible access to parameters of jaw muscle function and its interaction with the craniomandibular system.

[1]  M Ringqvist,et al.  Isometric bite force and its relation to dimensions of the facial skeleton. , 1973, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[2]  B. Solow,et al.  Sex differences in craniofacial morphology. , 1975, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[3]  K. Schellhas MR imaging of muscles of mastication. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  W. Proffit,et al.  Occlusal Forces in Normal- and Long-face Adults , 1983, Journal of dental research.

[5]  E. Møller The chewing apparatus. An electromyographic study of the action of the muscles of mastication and its correlation to facial morphology. , 1966, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[6]  F C van Ginkel,et al.  Comparison of Jaw-muscle Bite-force Cross-sections Obtained by Means of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and High-resolution CT Scanning , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[7]  J. Devincenzo,et al.  Masseter muscle position relative to dentofacial form. , 1970, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  S. Seltzer,et al.  Modern imaging of the masseter muscle: normal anatomy and pathosis on CT and MRI. , 1987, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[9]  M. Bakke,et al.  Temporalis and masseter muscle activity in patients with anterior open bite and craniomandibular disorders. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[10]  J. Ferrucci Body ultrasonography (second of two parts). , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  B Ingervall,et al.  Masticatory muscle force and facial morphology in man. , 1978, Archives of oral biology.

[12]  M Bakke,et al.  Clinical significance of isometric bite force versus electrical activity in temporal and masseter muscles. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[13]  B Hillen,et al.  Correlations between the cross-sectional area of the jaw muscles and craniofacial size and shape. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  A A Lowe,et al.  Relationship Between Jaw Muscle Volume and Craniofacial Form , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[15]  B Ingervall,et al.  Relation between facial morphology and activity of the masticatory muscles. , 1974, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Bakke,et al.  Unilateral, isometric bite force in 8-68-year-old women and men related to occlusal factors. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[17]  R. Yemm,et al.  Changes in human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles with age: a study by computed tomography. , 1987, Gerodontics.