Relationship between dielectric permittivity and water content for vadose zone materials of volcanic origin

Seven materials, encompassing a young volcanic soil, its parent material, two older buried soils (Palaeosols), and an underlying older volcanic deposit were investigated in a laboratory study to determine the relationship between dielectric permittivity (ϵc) and water content (θ). Empirical 3rd-order polynomial models generally fitted the data better than semi-physical 3-phase mixing models and normalised conversion functions. Based on their different dielectric response, which presumably is mainly due to their different bulk density (and thus porosity), the materials could be grouped into Ignimbrite materials and Palaeosol materials. Relative to the Ignimbrites, Palaeosols showed a particularly muted response at the low end of dielectric permittivity measurements, which could be due to a particularly high amount of bound water in these allophane-rich materials and/or to greater microstructural and phase configuration effects. Applying the Topp equation resulted in substantial underestimations of the water contents of both groups. A relationship previously developed on New Zealand sandy volcanic soils fitted our Ignimbrite materials well, but still underestimated the water contents of the Palaeosols substantially. Normalised conversion functions described both material groupings reasonably well, demonstrating that bulk density differences can explain a substantial part of the variation of ϵc–θ relationships between different materials.

[1]  Mark A. Nearing Compressive Strength for an Aggregated and Partially Saturated Soil , 1995 .

[2]  S. Hamburg,et al.  Automatic, real-time monitoring of soil moisture in a remote field area with time domain reflectometry. , 1991 .

[3]  D. Or,et al.  Time domain reflectometry measurement principles and applications , 2002 .

[4]  R. Parfitt,et al.  Estimation of forms of Fe and Al - a review, and analysis of contrasting soils by dissolution and Mossbauer methods , 1988 .

[5]  R. Plagge,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the relationship between soil dielectric constant and volumetric water conte , 1992 .

[6]  Brent Clothier,et al.  A Dielectric–Water Content Relationship for Sandy Volcanic Soils in New Zealand , 1999 .

[7]  A. Hewitt New Zealand soil classification. , 1993 .

[8]  A. R. Socorro,et al.  Time domain reflectometry models as a tool to understand the dielectric response of volcanic soils , 2003 .

[9]  L. Molloy,et al.  Soils in the New Zealand Landscape -the living mantle , 1988 .

[10]  C. M. Regalado A geometrical model of bound water permittivity based on weighted averages: the allophane analogue , 2006 .

[11]  Michael Keller,et al.  Calibration of time domain reflectometry technique using undisturbed soil samples from humid tropical soils of volcanic origin , 1997 .

[12]  Scott B. Jones,et al.  Microstructural and phase configurational effects determining water content: Dielectric relationships of aggregated porous media , 2006 .

[13]  C. Dirksen,et al.  IMPROVED CALIBRATION OF TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY SOIL WATER CONTENT MEASUREMENTS , 1993 .

[14]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Dielectric Behavior of Wet Soil-Part II: Dielectric Mixing Models , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  E. I. Parkhomenko Electrical properties of rocks , 1967 .

[16]  R. Parfitt Allophane in New Zealand - a review , 1990 .

[17]  T. Miyamoto,et al.  Extended Dual Composite Sphere Model for Determining Dielectric Permittivity of Andisols , 2005 .

[18]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[19]  Arthur W. Warrick,et al.  Derived functions of time domain reflectometry for soil moisture measurement , 1999 .

[20]  T. Schmugge,et al.  An Empirical Model for the Complex Dielectric Permittivity of Soils as a Function of Water Content , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Christian Camerlynck,et al.  Numerical modeling for investigating the physical meaning of the relationship between relative dielectric permittivity and water content of soils , 2000 .

[22]  R. Schulin,et al.  Calibration of time domain reflectometry for water content measurement using a composite dielectric approach , 1990 .

[23]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[24]  T. Miyamoto,et al.  Applicability of multiple length TDR probes to measure water distributions in an Andisol under different tillage systems in Japan , 2001 .

[25]  Christian Roth,et al.  Improving the calibration of dielectric TDR soil moisture determination taking into account the solid soil , 1996 .

[26]  Jan W. Hopmans,et al.  Time Domain Reflectometry Calibration for Uniformly and Nonuniformly Wetted Sandy and Clayey Loam Soils , 1992 .

[27]  W. R. Hook,et al.  Errors in Converting Time Domain Reflectometry Measurements of Propagation Velocity to Estimates of Soil Water Content , 1996 .

[28]  S. Friedman A saturation degree‐dependent composite spheres model for describing the effective dielectric constant of unsaturated porous media , 1998 .

[29]  S. R. Evett,et al.  Advances in Soil Water Content Sensing: The Continuing Maturation of Technology and Theory , 2005 .

[30]  R. Stenger,et al.  Laboratory calibrations of water content reflectometers and their in-situ verification , 2005 .

[31]  A. Alharthi,et al.  Soil water saturation: Dielectric determination , 1987 .

[32]  L. Blakemore Methods for chemical analysis of soils , 1972 .