Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish

Abstract Finnish vowel harmony rules require that if the vowel in the first syllable of a word belongs to one of two vowel sets, then all subsequent vowels in that word must belong either to the same set or to a neutral set. A harmony mismatch between two syllables containing vowels from the opposing sets thus signals a likely word boundary. We report five experiments showing that Finnish listeners can exploit this information in an on-line speech segmentation task. Listeners found it easier to detect words like hymy at the end of the nonsense string puhymy (where there is a harmony mismatch between the first two syllables) than in the string pyhymy (where there is no mismatch). There was no such effect, however, when the target words appeared at the beginning of the nonsense string (e.g., hymypu vs hymypy ). Stronger harmony effects were found for targets containing front harmony vowels (e.g., hymy ) than for targets containing back harmony vowels (e.g., palo in kypalo and kupalo ). The same pattern of results appeared whether target position within the string was predictable or unpredictable. Harmony mismatch thus appears to provide a useful segmentation cue for the detection of word onsets in Finnish speech.

[1]  L. Nakatani,et al.  Locus of segmental cues for word juncture. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  W. Zwanenburg,et al.  LA FRONTIÈRE DU MOT EN FRANÇAIS , 1977 .

[3]  F. Samejima Cognitive processes. , 2021, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[4]  Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder,et al.  The syllable's role in speech segmentation , 1981 .

[5]  Kari Suomi,et al.  Palatal Vowel Harmony: A Perceptually Motivated Phenomenon? , 1983, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[6]  M. P. R. van den Broecke,et al.  Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , 1984 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Emmanuel Dupoux Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish , 1992 .

[9]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  James R. Sawusch,et al.  The influence of stress, vowel, and juncture cues on segmentation , 1993 .

[11]  J. Mehler,et al.  Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese , 1993 .

[12]  D. Norris Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[13]  Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words , 1994 .

[14]  A. Cutler,et al.  Mora or Phoneme? Further Evidence for Language-Specific Listening , 1994 .

[15]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  Models of continuous speech recognition and the contents of the vocabulary , 1995 .

[16]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Word Identification in Fluent Speech , 1995 .

[17]  D. Norris,et al.  The Possible-Word Constraint in the Segmentation of Continuous Speech , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.