Determinants of container port choice in Spain

For the economic and financial evaluation of port investment projects, it is important to know the demand function of a port's services. The objective of this study is to establish such a demand choice function for the Spanish container port services. The function is derived from the coefficients of a port choice model, for which a multinomial logit model is used and of which the coefficients are estimated with regression analysis. The variables tested concern inland transport cost, ocean transport costs and broad proxy variables for quality of service. Information on container import and export flows for 2007 is obtained from the Spanish Treasury Department. The linear regression analysis is based on differences of utilities of alternative routings of containerised cargoes compared to those routed via the port of Valencia. The obtained results are satisfactory in terms of model fit. The estimated coefficients can be used to assess the impact of changes in costs of container flows routed via a port on a port's market share. A demand choice function for the port can be derived by systematically doing so. An example is presented for the port of Valencia.

[1]  Dong-Wook Song,et al.  A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[2]  Lorena Garcia-Alonso,et al.  Port selection from a hinterland perspective , 2009 .

[3]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Governance in Seaport Clusters , 2004 .

[4]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  A disaggregate analysis of port selection , 2004 .

[5]  Anthony Kenneth Charles Beresford,et al.  An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective , 2004 .

[6]  Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso,et al.  Determinants of Mode Choice between Road and Shipping for Freight Transport: Evidence for Four Spanish Exporting Sectors , 2004 .

[7]  Simme Veldman,et al.  A Model on Container Port Competition: An Application for the West European Container Hub-Ports , 2003 .

[8]  村上 英樹.  J. O. Jansson and D. Shneerson, Liner Shipping Economics, Chapmanand Hall, 1987 , 1992 .

[9]  C. Winston.  Identification of dependent probit models: A simplified approach , 1981 .

[10]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection , 2001 .

[11]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[12]  Simme Veldman,et al.  River Depth and Container Port Market Shares: The Impact of Deepening the Scheldt River on the West European Container Hub-Port Market Shares , 2005 .

[13]  J. Jansson,et al.  Liner Shipping Economics , 1987 .

[14]  Wesley W. Wilson,et al.  International Trade, Transportation Networks and Port Choice , 2006 .

[15]  Piyush Tiwari,et al.  Shippers' Port and Carrier Selection Behaviour in China: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2003 .

[16]  Anming Zhang.  The impact of hinterland access , 2009 .

[17]  Anming Zhang,et al.  The Impact of Hinterland Access Conditions on Rivalry between Ports , 2008 .

[18]  Tae Hoon Oum.  ALTERNATIVE DEMAND MODELS AND THEIR ELASTICITY ESTIMATES , 1989 .

[19]  Christopher M. Anderson,et al.  The Demand for Import Services at US Container Ports , 2009 .

[20]  L. García-Menéndez,et al.  Integration of foreign trade and maritime transport statistics in Spain , 2010 .

[21]  C. F. Phillips.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[22]  Rosa Marina González,et al.  Inter-Island Travel Demand Response with Discrete Choice Models: Functional Form, Forecasts, and Elasticities , 2002 .

[23]  Bruce A. Blonigen,et al.  The Navigation Economic Technologies Program February 1 , 2006 NEW MEASURES OF PORT EFFICIENCY USING INTERNATIONAL TRADE DATA , 2006 .