In pursuit of visual attention: SSVEP frequency-tagging moving targets

Previous research has shown that visual attention does not always exactly follow gaze direction, leading to the concepts of overt and covert attention. However, it is not yet clear how such covert shifts of visual attention to peripheral regions impact the processing of the targets we directly foveate as they move in our visual field. The current study utilised the co-registration of eye-position and EEG recordings while participants tracked moving targets that were embedded with a 30 Hz frequency tag in a Steady State Visually Evoked Potentials (SSVEP) paradigm. When the task required attention to be divided between the moving target (overt attention) and a peripheral region where a second target might appear (covert attention), the SSVEPs elicited by the tracked target at the 30 Hz frequency band were significantly, but transiently, lower than when participants did not have to covertly monitor for a second target. Our findings suggest that neural responses of overt attention are only briefly reduced when attention is divided between covert and overt areas. This neural evidence is in line with theoretical accounts describing attention as a pool of finite resources, such as the perceptual load theory. Altogether, these results have practical implications for many real-world situations where covert shifts of attention may discretely reduce visual processing of objects even when they are directly being tracked with the eyes.

[1]  S. Martens,et al.  Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  M. Missal,et al.  What triggers catch-up saccades during visual tracking? , 2002, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[3]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Susan L. Travis,et al.  Neural Responses to Target Features outside a Search Array Are Enhanced during Conjunction but Not Unique-Feature Search , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Jason B Mattingley,et al.  Differential Deployment of Visual Attention During Interactive Approach and Avoidance Behavior. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Hilda M. Fehd,et al.  Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object tracking. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[7]  Enrico Calore,et al.  Covert enaction at work: Recording the continuous movements of visuospatial attention to visible or imagined targets by means of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs) , 2016, Cortex.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Martin Rolfs,et al.  Adaptive deployment of spatial and feature-based attention before saccades , 2013, Vision Research.

[11]  N. Qian,et al.  Sites of overt and covert attention define simultaneous spatial reference centers for visuomotor response , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Caldara,et al.  Developing attentional control in naturalistic dynamic road crossing situations , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[15]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[16]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Spatial Attention Modulates Center-Surround Interactions in Macaque Visual Area V4 , 2009, Neuron.

[17]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  J F Thayer,et al.  Facial muscle activity and EEG recordings: redundancy analysis. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location , 2014 .

[20]  D. Kahneman Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[21]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Sustained Multifocal Attentional Enhancement of Stimulus Processing in Early Visual Areas Predicts Tracking Performance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  F. Biassoni,et al.  Visual exploration of pedestrian crossings by adults and children: Comparison of strategies , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[23]  Spatial attention and reaction times during smooth pursuit eye movement , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Enhanced brain responses to color during smooth-pursuit eye movements. , 2017, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Jason Bell,et al.  Local motion effects on form in radial frequency patterns. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[27]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[29]  S. Andersen,et al.  Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Adriane E Seiffert,et al.  The channel capacity of visual awareness divided among multiple moving objects , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[32]  N. Lavie Attention, Distraction, and Cognitive Control Under Load , 2010 .

[33]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  The default allocation of attention is broadly ahead of smooth pursuit. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[35]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Saccadic suppression measured by steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). , 2019, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Neural Basis of Superior Performance of Action Videogame Players in an Attention-Demanding Task , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  Feature-based interference from unattended visual field during attentional tracking in younger and older adults. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[39]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Look here but ignore what you see: effects of distractors at fixation. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  J. Badler,et al.  Divergence between oculomotor and perceptual causality. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[41]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  An objective method for measuring face detection thresholds using the sweep steady-state visual evoked response. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[42]  Yodchanan Wongsawat,et al.  A multi-command SSVEP-based BCI system based on single flickering frequency half-field steady-state visual stimulation , 2016, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[43]  Matteo Valsecchi,et al.  Attention is allocated closely ahead of the target during smooth pursuit eye movements: Evidence from EEG frequency tagging , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Reliability of event-related EEG functional connectivity during visual entrainment: magnitude squared coherence and phase synchrony estimates. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[45]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[46]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Foveal analysis and peripheral selection during active visual sampling , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  A. Reeves,et al.  Shared attention for smooth pursuit and saccades. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[48]  Z. Dienes Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On? , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[49]  Annabelle Blangero,et al.  Electrophysiological indices of surround suppression in humans. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  P. van Donkelaar,et al.  The allocation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[52]  Zhenlan Jin,et al.  Flexibility of foveal attention during ocular pursuit. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[53]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Asymmetric saccade reaction times to smooth pursuit , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.