Enhancing collaborative reasoning skills in online learning

Online collaborative learning is frequently discussed and the advantages for students' learning are often reported. However, discussion on the information content processing on students' ability for collaborative reasoning is relatively scarce. Collaborative reasoning, which is related to critical thinking and reasoning skills during collaboration, further complicates the learning process. Reasoning skills require students to go beyond the information given and most students are incapable of providing reasons and justification. Studies on collaborative reasoning have developed over the last few years. Early research had focused on the collaborative reasoning in face-to-face learning but the present interest is on online collaboration, which has now become increasingly common for learning. This article suggests possible ways of enhancing online collaborative reasoning skills by using scaffolding strategies. It also addresses the collaborative learning elements based on socio-cultural theory. The implementation and the effects of using scaffolding strategies for online collaborative reasoning are also discussed. The proposed model has the potential to influence pedagogical implementation and studies in computer-supported collaborative learning for both academician and researchers.

[1]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Concurrent Student-Managed Discussions in a Large Class. , 2009 .

[2]  L. Spears,et al.  Social presence, social interaction, collaborative learning, and satisfaction in online and face-to-face courses , 2012 .

[3]  Tyler A. Kummer,et al.  Teaching to the Test…or Testing to Teach: Exams Requiring Higher Order Thinking Skills Encourage Greater Conceptual Understanding , 2014 .

[4]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[5]  A.M. Urbina,et al.  The use of a context and mapping concepts to improve learning and problem solving ability , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[6]  Amy Soller,et al.  Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System , 2001 .

[7]  A. Gokhale Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[8]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century , 2013 .

[9]  V. John-Steiner,et al.  Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework , 1996 .

[10]  Angela D. Benson,et al.  Using Online Learning To Meet Workforce Demand: A Case Study of Stakeholder Influence. , 2002 .

[11]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning , 2013 .

[12]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Collaborative Reasoning: Expanding Ways for Children to Talk and Think in School , 2003 .

[13]  Karol I. Pelc,et al.  The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks , 1996 .

[14]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines , 1998 .

[15]  R. Gillies,et al.  Teachers' reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation , 2010 .

[16]  M. Pressley,et al.  Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions , 1999 .

[17]  N. Mercer,et al.  Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning , 2003 .

[18]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[19]  Elizabeth J. Burge,et al.  Learning in a computer conferenced contexts: The learner''s perspective , 2008 .

[20]  Fernando Romero,et al.  Towards a formal model of the pedagogic discourse and the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) of Vygotsky , 2012, 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing.

[21]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions , 2009 .

[22]  Alan M. Lesgold,et al.  What Makes Peer Interaction Effective? Modeling Effective Communication in an Intelligent CSCL , 1999 .

[23]  D. Schunk Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .

[24]  Michael Shayer,et al.  Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students , 1990 .

[25]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory , 2012 .

[26]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Influence of a Teacher’s Scaffolding Moves During Child-Led Small-Group Discussions , 2011 .

[27]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[28]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. , 1999 .

[29]  Bruce R. Patton,et al.  Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skillsin an Argumentation-Based Guided Inquiry Course , 2012 .

[30]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  E. Çataloğlu,et al.  The effects of students' reasoning abilities on conceptual understandings and problem-solving skills in introductory mechanics , 2007 .

[32]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective , 2006 .

[33]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  College students' skills of online argumentation: The role of scaffolding and their conceptions , 2014 .

[34]  Il-Hee Kim Development of reasoning skills through participation in collaborative synchronous online discussions , 2014, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[35]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Effects of Argument Scaffolding and Source Credibility on Science Text Comprehension , 2014 .

[36]  Roger W. Barnard,et al.  Sociocultural theory and the teaching of process writing: The scaffolding of learning in a university context , 2005 .

[37]  Morten Flate Paulsen,et al.  Online Education Systems: Discussion and Definition of Terms , 2002 .

[38]  R. Rimor,et al.  Instructor's Scaffolding in Support of Student's Metacognition through a Teacher Education Online Course ─ A Case Study , 2008 .

[39]  Nancy Rolph Boblett,et al.  Scaffolding: Defining the Metaphor , 2012 .

[40]  Vassilis Komis,et al.  ‘Scaffolding’ through talk in groupwork learning , 2009 .

[41]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[42]  Dianne L. Conrad,et al.  Deep in the Hearts of Learners: Insights into the Nature of Online Community , 2002 .

[43]  Martha Waggoner Collaborative Reasoning about Stories. , 1995 .

[44]  Susan M. Land,et al.  A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions , 2004 .

[45]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes , 1998 .

[46]  Aeran Choi,et al.  SUCCESS, DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY TO ENACT AN ARGUMENT-BASED INQUIRY APPROACH: EXPERIENCES OF ELEMENTARY TEACHERS , 2015 .

[47]  Symeon Retalis,et al.  Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics , 2010, Comput. Educ..