Prehospital intravenous line placement assessment in the French emergency system: a prospective study

Background and objective: Out‐of‐hospital intravenous line placement is used daily. All available studies take place using paramedics, e.g. US‐American emergency medical system. The aim of this study was to assess the intravenous line placement feasibility (time and success rate) in the French emergency medical system. Methods: A prospective observational study was performed by a French out‐of‐hospital team during 3‐month assessing the timing and success rates for intravenous line placement. All patients were enrolled at the emergency medical service of a university hospital in France. Six hundred and sixty‐nine consecutive patients were included, 388 (58%) had at least one intravenous line placement in the out‐of‐hospital setting. Results: Success rate was 76% at the first attempt and 98% at the second attempt. The overall success rate for intravenous line placement was 99.7% (only one failure), and the average successful intravenous line time was 4.4 ± 2.8 min. Attempts ranged from 1 to 8. The time for intravenous line placement with blood sampling (58% of patients) is statistically longer than without (4.6 ± 2.5 vs. 4.3 ± 3 min, P < 0.05). Seventeen of the enrolled patients were trauma patients, and 83% were non‐trauma patients. Four hundred and twenty‐seven intravenous lines were placed, intravenous 10% had more than one intravenous line. Seventy‐one percent of the intravenous lines were used to infuse drugs, the others were security intravenous. No significant difference was noticed between trauma and non‐trauma patients in regard to the success rate and the time to place the intravenous line. Conclusion: The out‐of‐hospital team was skilled at intravenous line placement (success rate = 99.7%), and the time required to performed intravenous line access was short.

[1]  H. Meislin,et al.  A prospective in-field comparison of intravenous line placement by urban and nonurban emergency medical services personnel. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  F. Lewis,et al.  Panel: prehospital trauma care--stabilize or scoop and run. , 1983, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  L. White,et al.  Prehospital use of analgesia for suspected extremity fractures. , 2000, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[4]  G. McSwain,et al.  Evaluation of resuscitation from cardiopulmonary arrest by paramedics. , 1980, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  P. Pons,et al.  Prehospital venous access in an urban paramedic system--a prospective on-scene analysis. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  C. Slovis,et al.  Success rates for initiation of intravenous therapy en route by prehospital care providers. , 1990, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[7]  F. Lapostolle,et al.  Évaluation du respect des recommandations pour la mise en place des voies veineuses périphériques en médecine d’urgence préhospitalière , 2005 .

[8]  J. Williams,et al.  Ineffectiveness of on-site intravenous lines: is prehospital time the culprit? , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  S. Jones,et al.  Prehospital intravenous line placement: a prospective study. , 1989, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  W. Dick,et al.  Anglo-American vs. Franco-German Emergency Medical Services System , 2003, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[11]  H. Meislin,et al.  Comparison of clinically significant infection rates among prehospital-versus in-hospital-initiated i.v. lines. , 1995, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  Bracken Mb Pharmacological treatment of acute spinal cord injury: current status and future projects. , 1993 .

[13]  X. Capdevila,et al.  Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Femoral Bone Fractures in Prehospital Care , 2003, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[14]  S. Norwood,et al.  Catheter-related infections and associated septicemia. , 1991, Chest.

[15]  S. A. Pace,et al.  Paramedic decisions with placement of out-of-hospital intravenous lines. , 1999, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[16]  L. White,et al.  P REHOSPITAL U SE OF A NALGESIA FOR S USPECTED E XTREMITY F RACTURES , 2000 .

[17]  Joseph T. McDermott,et al.  F EW E MERGENCY M EDICAL S ERVICES P ATIENTS WITH L OWER-EXTREMITY F RACTURES R ECEIVE P REHOSPITAL A NALGESIA , 2002, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[18]  R. Belsole,et al.  Radial nerve injury after routine peripheral vein cannulation. , 1995, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[19]  B. Debaene,et al.  Infections liées aux cathéters veineux en réanimation. Physiopathologie, diagnostic, traitement et prévention , 2001 .

[20]  R. Lewis,et al.  Out-of-hospital intravenous access: unnecessary procedures and excessive cost. , 1998, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[21]  J. Marty,et al.  Epidemiology of adverse effects of prehospital sedation analgesia. , 2003, The American journal of emergency medicine.