Unsteady aerodynamics for aeroelastic applications using the impulse response method

Aeroelasticity is a critical issue in the design of aircraft and other aerospace vehicles, particularly those with highly flexible components. A reliable but efficient analysis tool is required to aid decision-making in the preliminary design phase. This thesis focuses on the unsteady aerodynamics component of the total aeroelastic system. Classically unsteady aerodynamics has been grounded on the Theodorsen function, which identifies the response of a 2-D wing section to harmonic pitch and plunge oscillations. Recently, however, the Aerodynamic Impulse Response has emerged, identifying a more fundamental aerodynamic response of a discrete-time system as that to a unit impulse. With this response, the response to any motion in the time domain can be easily predicted. This thesis examines the Aerodynamic Impulse Response method using an aerodynamic panel code, PMARC, to obtain impulse responses. The basic formulation of the method is limited to rigid-body analyses and is thus of limited use to aeroelastic studies. To this end, the method is extended to flexible-body responses by considering impulse distribution functions that are related to structural mode shapes of the body. Both linear and nonlinear responses are considered: the former uses convolution to generate arbitrary responses, the later the Volterra series. Linear results for both rigid and flexible bodies are encouraging. Predictions for a range of input motions closely match the unsteady response from PMARC for the same motion. However, for harmonic motion accuracy erodes for f/At < 0.05, limiting the frequency range over which the model is accurate. Nonlinear responses are erratic and further study is required. Thesis Supervisor: Carlos E. S. Cesnik Title: Assistant Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics

[1]  REDUCED-ORDER AEROELASTIC MODELING USING PROPER-ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSTIONS , .

[2]  W. Silva,et al.  Discrete-time linear and nonlinear aerodynamic impulse responses for efficient cfd analyses , 1997 .

[3]  Eliot A. Cohen,et al.  New World Vistas: Air and Space Power for the 21st Century , 1996 .

[4]  B. Maskew PROGRAM VSAERO: A computer program for calculating the non-linear aerodynamic characteristics of arbitrary configurations: User's manual , 1982 .

[5]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Eigenmode Analysis in Unsteady Aerodynamics: Reduced Order Models , 1997 .

[6]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Eigenmode Analysis and Reduced-Order Modeling of Unsteady Transonic Potential Flow Around Airfoils , 2000 .

[7]  H Durham Michael,et al.  The Benchmark Active Controls Technology Model Aerodynamic Data , 1997 .

[8]  Michael R. Dudley,et al.  Potential Flow Theory and Operation Guide for the Panel Code PMARC , 1999 .

[9]  Walter A. Silva,et al.  Reduced-Order Models Based on Linear and Nonlinear Aerodynamic Impulse Responses , 1999 .

[10]  J. Hess CALCULATION OF POTENTIAL FLOW ABOUT ARBITRARY THREE-DIMENSIONAL LIFTING BODIES , 1972 .

[11]  F. Udwadia,et al.  The identification of building structural systems , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  D. Peters,et al.  Finite state induced flow models. I - Two-dimensional thin airfoil , 1995 .

[13]  Mark Drela,et al.  INTEGRATED SIMULATION MODEL FOR PRELIMINARY AERODYNAMIC, STRUCTURAL, AND CONTROL-LAW DESIGN OF AIRCRAFT , 1999 .

[14]  Dean T. Mook,et al.  Time-domain simulation for evaluating smart wing concepts for reducing gust loads , 1999, Smart Structures.

[15]  Miguel Ortega-Morales,et al.  Modeling and control of the aeroelastic response of highly flexible active wings , 2000 .

[16]  Non-linear modal analysis of the forced response of structural systems , 1996 .

[17]  John L Hess,et al.  An Improved Higher Order Panel Method for Three-Dimensional Lifting Potential Flow. , 1981 .

[18]  H. Ashley,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamic modeling for arbitrary motions , 1977 .

[19]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Reduced-order aerodynamic models for aeroelastic control of turbomachines , 1999 .

[20]  Heeg Jennifer,et al.  Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Insights Using Eigenanalysis , 1999 .

[21]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Unsteady low-speed aerodynamic model for complete aircraft configurations , 1988 .

[22]  C. H. Fox,et al.  Improved method for aerodynamic analysis of wing-body-tail configurations in subsonic and supersonic flow , 1974 .

[23]  L. Jezequel,et al.  Modal analysis of nonlinear multi-degree-of-freedom structures , 1992 .

[24]  H. J.,et al.  Hydrodynamics , 1924, Nature.

[25]  C. T. Tran,et al.  Semi-empirical model for the dynamic stall of airfoils in view of the , 1980 .

[26]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Evaluation of computational algorithms suitable for fluid-structure interactions , 2000 .

[27]  Shirley Dex,et al.  JR 旅客販売総合システム(マルス)における運用及び管理について , 1991 .

[28]  Marilyn J. Smith,et al.  An Evaluation of Computational Algorithms to Interface Between CFD and CSD Methodologies. , 1996 .

[29]  Oddvar Bendiksen,et al.  A new approach to computational aeroelasticity , 1991 .

[30]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  On the importance of aerodynamic and structural geometrical nonlinearities in aeroelastic behavior of high-aspect-ratio wings , 2000 .

[31]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Renaissance of Aeroelasticity and Its Future , 1999 .

[32]  D. R. Bristow,et al.  Development of panel methods for subsonic analysis and design , 1980 .

[33]  Walter A. Silva,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF LINEAR AND NONLINEAR AERODYNAMIC IMPULSE RESPONSES USING DIGITAL FILTER TECHNIQUES , 1997 .

[34]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Characterizing the Efiects of Geometrical Nonlinearities on Aeroelastic Behavior of High-Aspect-Ratio Wings , 1999 .

[35]  J. Katz,et al.  Low-Speed Aerodynamics , 1991 .

[36]  John W. Edwards,et al.  Current status of computational methods for transonic unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelastic applications , 1992 .

[37]  Alfred E. Magnus,et al.  PAN AIR: A Computer Program for Predicting Subsonic or Supersonic Linear Potential Flows About Arbitrary Configurations Using a Higher Order Panel Method. Volume 1; Theory Document (Version 1.1) , 1981 .

[38]  R. Ibrahim,et al.  Linear and nonlinear modal analysis of aeroelastic structural systems , 1986 .

[39]  H. Youngren,et al.  Comparison of panel method formulations and its influence on the development of QUADPAN, an advanced low-order method , 1983 .

[40]  John T. Batina,et al.  Aeroelastic Analysis of Wings Using the Euler Equations with a Deforming Mesh , 1990 .

[41]  K. Hall Eigenanalysis of unsteady flows about airfoils, cascades, and wings , 1994 .

[42]  F. A. Woodward An improved method for the aerodynamic analysis of wing-body-tail configurations in subsonic and supersonic flow. Part 1: Theory and application , 1973 .

[43]  Guru P. Guruswamy User's guide for ENSAERO: A multidisciplinary program for fluid/structural/control interaction studies of aircraft (release 1) , 1994 .

[44]  R. Carmichael,et al.  PAN AIR - A higher order panel method for predicting subsonic or supersonic linear potential flows about arbitrary configurations , 1981 .

[45]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity , 1981, Solid Mechanics and Its Applications.

[46]  Lonnie C. Ludeman,et al.  Fundamentals of Digital Signal Processing , 1986 .

[47]  Mark James Johnson,et al.  Finite-State Airloads for Deformable Airfoils on Fixed and Rotating Wings , 1994 .

[48]  Werner Krabs Mathematical foundations of signal theory , 1995 .

[49]  Kenneth C. Hall,et al.  EIGENANALYSIS OF UNSTEADY FLOW ABOUT AIRFOILS, CASCADES, AND WINGS , 1994 .

[50]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[51]  Marthinus C. Van Schoor,et al.  Aeroelastic characteristics of a highly flexible aircraft , 1990 .

[52]  George R. Cooper,et al.  Continuous and discrete signal and system analysis , 1984 .

[53]  Guru P. Guruswamy,et al.  Ensaero—A multidisciplinary program for fluid/structural interaction studies of aerospace vehicles , 1990 .