Isolation and Characterization of Actinomycete Antagonists of a Fungal Root Pathogen

By use of selective media, 267 actinomycete strains were isolated from four rhizosphere-associated and four non-rhizosphere-associated British soils. Organic media with low nutrient concentrations were found to be best for isolating diverse actinomycetes while avoiding contamination and overgrowth of isolation media by eubacteria and fungi. While all isolates grew well at pHs 6.5 to 8.0, a few were unable to grow at pH 6.0 and a significant number failed to grow at pH 5.5. Eighty-two selected isolates were screened for in vitro antagonism towards Pythium ultimum by use of a Difco cornmeal agar assay procedure. Five isolates were very strong antagonists of the fungus, four were strong antagonists, and ten others were weakly antagonistic. The remaining isolates showed no antagonism by this assay. Additional studies showed that several of the P. ultimum antagonists also strongly inhibited growth of other root-pathogenic fungi. Twelve isolates showing antifungal activity in the in vitro assay were also tested for their effects on the germination and short-term growth of lettuce plants in glasshouse pot studies in the absence of pathogens. None of the actinomycetes prevented seed germination, although half of the isolates retarded seed germination and outgrowth of the plants by 1 to 3 days. During 18-day growth experiments, biomass yields of some actinomycete-inoculated plants were reduced in comparison with untreated control plants, although all plants appeared healthy and well rooted. None of the actinomycetes significantly enhanced plant growth over these short-term experiments. For some, but not all, actinomycetes, some correlations between delayed seed germination and reduced 18-day plant biomass yields were seen. For others, plant biomass yields were not reduced despite an actinomycete-associated delay in seed germination and plant outgrowth. Preliminary glasshouse experiments indicated that some of the actinomycetes protect germinating lettuce seeds against damping-off caused by P. ultimum.

[1]  D. Crawford,et al.  Survival and effects of wild-type, mutant, and recombinant Streptomyces in a soil ecosystem , 1989 .

[2]  R. Laxman,et al.  Physiology and nutritional aspects of actinomycetes: an overview , 1991, World journal of microbiology & biotechnology.

[3]  Julie Meyer,et al.  Selective influence on populations of rhizosphere or rhizoplane bacteria and actinomycetes by mycorrhizas formed by Glomus fasciculatum , 1986 .

[4]  P. Broadbent,et al.  Bacteria and actinomycetes antagonistic to fungal root pathogens in Australian soils. , 1971, Australian Journal of Biological Sciences.

[5]  N. Sabaou,et al.  Actinomycètes parasites de champignons : étude des espèces, spécificité de l'action parasitaire au genre Fusarium et antagonisme dans le sol envers Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. albedinis (Killian et Maire) Gordon , 1987 .

[6]  A. Ghaffar,et al.  Biological Control of Macrophomina phaseolina Charcoal Rot of Sunflower and Mung Bean , 1990 .

[7]  G. Papavizas,et al.  Evaluation of Oospore Hyperparasites for the Control of Phytophthora Crown Rot of Pepper , 1991 .

[8]  J. A. Veen,et al.  Fluctuations in the fluorescent pseudomonad and actinomycete populations of rhizosphere and rhizoplane during the growth of spring wheat , 1990 .

[9]  R. Tahvonen.  Preliminary experiments into the use of Streptomyces spp. isolated from peat in the biological control of soil and seed-borne diseases in peat culture , 1982 .

[10]  G. Turhan,et al.  Suppression of Damping off on Pepper Caused by Pythium ultimum Trow and Rhizoctonia solani Kühn by Some New Antagonists in Comparison with Trichoderma harzianum Rifai , 1989 .

[11]  Wolfgang Zimmermann,et al.  Degradation of lignin by bacteria , 1990 .

[12]  M. Saracchi,et al.  Isolation of Endophytic Streptomyces Strains from Surface-Sterilized Roots , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[13]  I. Stevenson.  Antibiotic activity of actinomycetes in soil as demonstrated by direct observation techniques. , 1956, Journal of general microbiology.

[14]  A. Bolton.  Control of Pythium aphanidermatum in poinsettia in a soilless culture by Trichoderma viride and a Streptomyces sp. , 1980 .

[15]  J. Defrank,et al.  Screening Procedures to Identify Soil-Borne Actinomycetes That Can Produce Herbicidal Compounds , 1985, Weed Science.

[16]  J. Knauss.  In vitro antagonistic activity of several Streptomyces spp. against species of Pythium and Phytophthora. , 1976 .

[17]  R. Ames.  Mycorrhiza development in onion in response to inoculation with chitindecomposing actinomycetes , 1989 .

[18]  M. Klein,et al.  The dynamics of actinomycetes and fluorescent pseudomonads in wheat rhizoplane and rhizosphere. , 1990 .

[19]  J. A. Veen,et al.  Variation and composition of bacterial populations in the rhizospheres of maize, wheat, and grass cultivars , 1989 .

[20]  J. Tu.  Hyperparasitism of Streptomyces albus on a Destructive Mycoparasite Nectria inventa , 1986 .

[21]  F. Grossmann,et al.  Investigation of a Great Number of Actinomycete Isolates on Their Antagonistic Effects Against Soil-Borne Fungal Plant Pathogens by an Improved Method , 1986 .