To follow or not? How animals in fusion-fission societies handle conflicting information during group decision-making.

When group members possess differing information about the environment, they may disagree on the best movement decision. Such conflicts result in group break-ups, and are therefore a fundamental driver of fusion-fission group dynamics. Yet, a paucity of empirical work hampers our understanding of how adaptive evolution has shaped plasticity in collective behaviours that promote and maintain fusion-fission dynamics. Using movement data from GPS-collared bison, we found that individuals constantly associated with other animals possessing different spatial knowledge, and both personal and conspecific information influenced an individual's patch choice decisions. During conflict situations, bison used group familiarity coupled with their knowledge of local foraging options and recently sampled resource quality when deciding to follow or leave a group - a tactic that led to energy-rewarding movements. Natural selection has shaped collective behaviours for coping with social conflicts and resource heterogeneity, which maintain fusion-fission dynamics and play an essential role in animal distribution.

[1]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Energy gains predict the distribution of plains bison across populations and ecosystems. , 2011, Ecology.

[2]  Thomas J Valone,et al.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  J. Fryxell,et al.  Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[4]  O. Petit,et al.  Distributed leadership in semifree-ranging white-faced capuchin monkeys , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Colin A. Chapman,et al.  Fission‐Fusion Dynamics , 2008, Current Anthropology.

[6]  John M. Fryxell,et al.  Foraging ecology of bison at the landscape and plant community levels: the applicability of energy maximization principles , 2002, Oecologia.

[7]  D. Stephens.  Variance and the Value of Information , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[8]  T. Mchugh.  Social behavior of the American buffalo (Bison bison bison) , 1958, Zoologica : scientific contributions of the New York Zoological Society..

[9]  Deborah A. Jenkins,et al.  Socially informed random walks: incorporating group dynamics into models of population spread and growth , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Sean A. Rands,et al.  Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs , 2003, Nature.

[11]  J. Krebs,et al.  Learning and Foraging: Individuals, Groups, and Populations , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[12]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Conspecific Attraction and Habitat Quality on Habitat Selection in Territorial Birds (Troglodytes Aedon) , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[13]  JOHN FIEBERG,et al.  QUANTIFYING HOME-RANGE OVERLAP: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE UTILIZATION DISTRIBUTION , 2005 .

[14]  O. Petit,et al.  Decision-making processes: The case of collective movements , 2010, Behavioural Processes.

[15]  Larissa Conradt,et al.  Conflicts of interest and the evolution of decision sharing , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  B. Worton.  Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[17]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S12 Table S1 Full Reference List , 2022 .

[18]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[19]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  H. Beyer,et al.  Group-size-mediated habitat selection and group fusion-fission dynamics of bison under predation risk. , 2009, Ecology.

[21]  I. Couzin.  Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Andrew J. King,et al.  A rule-of-thumb based on social affiliation explains collective movements in desert baboons , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  Leaders, followers, and group decision-making , 2009, Communicative & integrative biology.

[24]  J. Godin,et al.  Context-dependent group size choice in fish , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Philip D. McLoughlin,et al.  COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF ENDANGERED WILDLIFE IN CANADA , 2009 .

[26]  Ilya R. Fischhoff,et al.  Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[28]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[29]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Collective decision‐making and fission–fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework , 2011 .

[30]  David W. Stephens,et al.  On economically tracking a variable environment , 1987 .

[31]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  I. Couzin,et al.  Consensus decision making in human crowds , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[34]  Jacqueline L. Frair,et al.  Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Downy Woodpecker Foraging Behavior: Efficient Sampling in Simple Stochastic Environments , 1984 .

[36]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Consensus Decision Making by Fish , 2008, Current Biology.

[37]  Michael R. Heithaus,et al.  Highly dynamic fission–fusion species can exhibit leadership when traveling , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  Cornelia Ebert,et al.  Group decision making in fission–fusion societies: evidence from two-field experiments in Bechstein's bats , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Radu V. Craiu,et al.  Inference Methods for the Conditional Logistic Regression Model with Longitudinal Data , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[40]  Gerald Kerth,et al.  Information transfer about roosts in female Bechstein's bats: an experimental field study , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Xulin Guo,et al.  Mechanisms of functional connectivity: the case of free-ranging bison in a forest landscape. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[42]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Searching behavior and use of sampling information by free-ranging bison (Bos bison) , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  J A Merkle,et al.  A memory-based foraging tactic reveals an adaptive mechanism for restricted space use. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[44]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[45]  D. Fortin,et al.  Bison distribution under conflicting foraging strategies: site fidelity vs. energy maximization. , 2015, Ecology.

[46]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Collective Learning and Optimal Consensus Decisions in Social Animal Groups , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[47]  Thomas Caraco,et al.  Risk‐Sensitivity and Foraging Groups , 1981 .

[48]  James N. M. Smith,et al.  FOOD-SEARCHING BEHAVIOR OF TITMICE IN PATCHY ENVIRONMENTS' , 1974 .

[49]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Steven C. Minta,et al.  Random Individual Association and Social Group Instability in American Bison (Bison bison) , 2010 .