Measurement of Ultrafine Particle Size Distributions from Coal-, Oil-, and Gas-Fired Stationary Combustion Sources

Abstract Currently, we have limited knowledge of the physical and chemical properties of emitted primary combustion aerosols and the changes in those properties caused by nucleation, condensation growth of volatile species, and particle coagulations under dilution and cooling in the ambient air. A dilution chamber was deployed to sample exhaust from a pilot-scale furnace burning various fuels at a nominal heat input rate of 160 kW/h−1 and 3% excess oxygen. The formation mechanisms of particles smaller than 420 nm in electrical mobility diameter were experimentally investigated by measurement with a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) as a function of aging times, dilution air ratios, combustion exhaust temperatures, and fuel types. Particle formation in the dilution process is a complex mixture of nucleation, coagulation, and condensational growth, depending on the concentrations of available condensable species and solid or liquid particles (such as soot, ash) in combustion exhausts. The measured particle size distributions in number concentrations measured show peaks of particle number concentrations for medium sulfur bituminous coal, No. 6 fuel oil, and natural gas at 40-50 nm, 70-100 nm, and 15-25 nm, respectively. For No. 6 fuel oil and coal, the particle number concentration is constant in the range of a dilution air ratio of 50, but the number decreases as the dilution air ratio decreases to 10. However, for natural gas, the particle number concentration is higher at a dilution air ratio of 10 and decreases at dilution air ratios of 20-50. At a dilution air ratio of 10, severe particle coagulation occurs in a relatively short time. Samples taken at different combustion exhaust temperatures for these fuel types show higher particle number concentrations at 645 K than at 450 K. As the aging time of particles increases, the particles increase in size and the number concentrations decrease. The largest gradient of particle number distribution occurs within the first 10 sec after dilution but shows only minor differences between 10 and 80 sec. The lifetimes of the ultrafine particles are relatively short, with a scale on the order of a few seconds. Results from this study suggest that an aging time of 10 sec and a dilution air ratio of 20 are sufficient to obtain representative primary particle emission samples from stationary combustion sources.

[1]  Hampden Kuhns,et al.  Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[2]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Relationship between particle mass and mobility for diesel exhaust particles. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  J. Watson Visibility: Science and Regulation , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  J. Chow,et al.  Introduction to the A&WMA 2002 Critical Review Visibility: Science and Regulation , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  A. Robinson,et al.  Effects of Sampling Conditions on the Size Distribution of Fine Particulate Matter Emitted from a Pilot-Scale Pulverized-Coal Combustor , 2002 .

[6]  R E Chase,et al.  A Comparison of Tailpipe, Dilution Tunnel, and Wind Tunnel Data in Measuring Motor Vehicle PM , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  N N Clark,et al.  Exhaust emissions from engines of the Detroit Diesel Corporation in transit buses: a decade of trends. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  J F Collins,et al.  Time resolved characterization of diesel particulate emissions. 1. Instruments for particle mass measurements. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  The West Virginia University Heavy Duty Vehicle Emissions Database as a Resource for Inventory and Comparative Studies , 2000 .

[10]  J S Lighty,et al.  Combustion Aerosols: Factors Governing Their Size and Composition and Implications to Human Health , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  Frank E. Huggins,et al.  Characterization of Fine Particulate Matter Produced by Combustion of Residual Fuel Oil , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  Barbara Zielinska,et al.  Characterizing PM2.5 emission profiles for stationary sources: comparison of traditional and dilution sampling techniques , 2000 .

[13]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Fine Particle and Gaseous Emission Rates from Residential Wood Combustion , 2000 .

[14]  U. Matter,et al.  DYNAMIC FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF SUBMICRON PARTICLES FROM DIESEL ENGINES , 1999 .

[15]  D. Kittelson,et al.  The influence of dilution conditions on diesel exhaust particle size distribution measurements , 1999 .

[16]  D. Kittelson,et al.  Characterization of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from a Spark Ignition Engine , 1998 .

[17]  Sverre Vedal,et al.  Ambient particles and health: lines that divide. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[18]  A. Peters,et al.  Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[19]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Bimodal character of accumulation mode aerosol mass distributions in Southern California , 1997 .

[20]  J Pekkanen,et al.  Effects of ultrafine and fine particles in urban air on peak expiratory flow among children with asthmatic symptoms. , 1997, Environmental research.

[21]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  The dri thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in U.S. Air quality studies , 1993 .

[22]  Glen R. Cass,et al.  A Dilution Stack Sampler for Collection of Organic Aerosol Emissions: Design, Characterization and Field Tests , 1989 .

[23]  R. Westerholm,et al.  Some aspects of the distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (pah) between particles and gas phase from diluted gasoline exhausts generated with the use of a dilution tunnel, and its validity for measurement in ambient air , 1988 .

[24]  J. A. Cooper,et al.  The mutagenic activity of particulate organic matter collected with a dilution sampler at coal-fired power plants. , 1987, JAPCA.

[25]  K. M. Cushing,et al.  Sampling and data handling methods for inhalable particulate sampling. Final report nov 78-dec 80 , 1982 .

[26]  K. T. Knapp,et al.  Dilution source sampling system. , 1980 .

[27]  Steven L. Plee,et al.  SOME MECHANISMS AFFECTING THE MASS OF DIESEL EXHAUST PARTICULATE COLLECTED FOLLOWING A DILUTION PROCESS , 1980 .