Spin Dependent Discrimination between Majorana and Dirac Dark Matter

A large number of observations reveal deviations from expected gravitational behaviour in astrophysical systems. This suggests that something is missing in our understanding of the Universe. A well established candidate for explaining these deviations is dark matter, a kind of matter that is not subject to photon interactions and thus can not be detected by absorbed or emitted light - it is dark. Even though we can not observe it at any detectable wavelength, dark matter is postulated to interact via gravitation. These interactions would then account for the shortcoming of gravitational pull from visible mass, explaining the observed irregular gravitational behaviour. One leading hypothesis is that the proposed dark matter component of the Universe is actually made out of massive, weakly interacting particles. As of today, there has not yet been any detection of such a particle, leaving the fundamental properties of dark matter unknown. There are currently several ongoing experimental projects searching for dark matter particles, and more are being planned. Furthermore, their accuracy is higher than ever, and if the dark matter particle hypothesis is correct, it is reasonable to expect a detection signal in the foreseeable future. The different searches take complementary approaches and exploit either annihilation, production or direct detection experiments. The latter, which is the focus of this thesis, aims to detect dark matter by measuring the recoil of a target nucleus in a detector when a dark matter particle scatters off of it. In case of positive detection at direct detection experiments, a model describing the interaction between dark matter particles and baryonic matter is needed in order to be able to draw conclusions about the dark matter particle properties. Under the assumption that dark matter is a spin 1/2 particle that only interacts with baryonic matter via spin dependent interactions, this thesis studies dark matter-nucleus scattering in order to see if it is feasible to discriminate between Majorana and Dirac dark matter. I find that, if dark matter particles are detected at three different experiments, the Majorana dark matter hypothesis can be rejected in favour of an alternative hypothesis in which dark matter is a Dirac particle. Restrictions on target elements that are of interest for this test are presented, and the test procedure is studied for setups containing some of them, namely: 131Xe, 127I, 73Ge, 23Na and 19F.

[1]  Philip D. Plowright Front , 2019, 2020 Fourth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4).

[2]  C. Yaguna New constraints on xenonphobic dark matter from DEAP-3600 , 2019, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[3]  G. Bertone,et al.  History of dark matter , 2018, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[4]  P. Daniel Meerburg,et al.  Aspects of dark matter annihilation in cosmology , 2018, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[5]  I. Irastorza,et al.  New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles , 2018, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics.

[6]  F. Queiroz,et al.  Prospects for determining the particle/antiparticle nature of WIMP dark matter with direct detection experiments , 2017, 1706.07819.

[7]  S. Parlati,et al.  The XENON1T dark matter experiment , 2017, The European Physical Journal C.

[8]  F. V. Massoli,et al.  XENON100 dark matter results from a combination of 477 live days , 2016, 1609.06154.

[9]  R. Massey,et al.  What does the Bullet Cluster tell us about Self-Interacting Dark Matter? , 2016, 1605.04307.

[10]  L. Rauch,et al.  Dark matter direct-detection experiments , 2015, 1509.08767.

[11]  C. A. Oxborrow,et al.  Planck2015 results , 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[12]  R. Catena,et al.  Form factors for dark matter capture by the Sun in effective theories , 2015, 1501.03729.

[13]  C. McCabe The Earth's velocity for direct detection experiments , 2013, 1312.1355.

[14]  R. Wang,et al.  Final model independent result of DAMA/LIBRA–phase1 , 2013, The European Physical Journal C.

[15]  A. Peter,et al.  WIMP physics with ensembles of direct-detection experiments , 2013, 1310.7039.

[16]  B. Gibson,et al.  The RAVE survey : the Galactic escape speed and the mass of the Milky Way , 2013, 1309.4293.

[17]  W. Haxton,et al.  Model-independent WIMP Scattering Responses and Event Rates: A Mathematica Package for Experimental Analysis , 2013, 1308.6288.

[18]  P. Panci,et al.  Tools for model-independent bounds in direct dark matter searches , 2013, 1307.5955.

[19]  P. Salucci,et al.  The Local Dark Matter Density , 2012, 1212.3670.

[20]  David W. Hogg,et al.  THE MILKY WAY'S CIRCULAR-VELOCITY CURVE BETWEEN 4 AND 14 kpc FROM APOGEE DATA , 2012, 1209.0759.

[21]  Wick Haxton,et al.  The Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter Direct Detection , 2012, 1203.3542.

[22]  Bangalore,et al.  Some more Exotic Dark Matter Candidates: GUT Balls, Fermi Balls... , 2011, 1109.5266.

[23]  K. Cranmer,et al.  Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics , 2010, 1007.1727.

[24]  D. J. Fixsen,et al.  THE TEMPERATURE OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND , 2009, 0911.1955.

[25]  M. P. Casado,et al.  The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider , 2008 .

[26]  A. Semenov,et al.  Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with micrOMEGAs_2.2 , 2008, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[27]  D. Clowe,et al.  A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter , 2006, astro-ph/0608407.

[28]  B. Gibson,et al.  The RAVE Survey: Constraining the Local Galactic Escape Speed , 2006, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[29]  G. Bertone,et al.  Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints , 2004, hep-ph/0404175.

[30]  G. Servant,et al.  Is the Lightest Kaluza-Klein Particle a Viable Dark Matter Candidate? , 2002, hep-ph/0206071.

[31]  M. Milgrom MOND--a pedagogical review , 2001, astro-ph/0112069.

[32]  M. Feast,et al.  Galactic kinematics of Cepheids from Hipparcos proper motions , 1997, astro-ph/9706293.

[33]  J. D. Lewin,et al.  Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil , 1996 .

[34]  M. Peskin,et al.  An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory , 1995 .

[35]  Widrow,et al.  Sterile neutrinos as dark matter. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[36]  Goodman,et al.  Detectability of certain dark-matter candidates. , 1985, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[37]  H. Brück Cosmology , 1951, Peirce's Pragmatism.

[38]  Wayne Hu Wandering in the Background: a Cosmic Microwave Background Explorer , 1995 .

[39]  S. P. Martin,et al.  Perceptual Content , 1994 .