Reliability, Learnability and Efficiency of Two Tools for Cement Crowns Retrieval in Dentistry

Background: Tooth-supported fixed dentures are commonly used in restorative dentistry, and have definitely reached a high survival rate; nevertheless, their removal is sometimes required mainly due to caries or other failures (poor fit, poor cementation and so on). Removing a definitive partial denture is not trivial since the used cement is not always known and it may be very resistant; additionally, there are various clinical circumstances in which a conservative disassembly would be desirable. Objective: assessing the performance of different tools for cement crowns retrieval in terms of reliability, learnability and efficiency. Methods: An experimental study has been performed on two different devices for conservative crown/bridge removal: a manual tool that is a sliding hammer, and an automatic tool, powered by compressed air. Both skilled and unexperienced operators have been considered and an experimental set up has been appositely designed in order to measure force versus time patterns. The peak applied force has been taken as an output variable for the evaluation of tool performance. Results: The automatic tool improves both the inter-operator and the intra-operator reliability, respectively from 79% to 95%, and from 69% to 92%. Additionally, the force pattern is significantly different between these two tools: the instrument powered by compressed air, produces a sharper peak force, as required to break fragile materials such as dental crown cement, and its efficiency can be estimated to be 75% higher. Both tools have a high learnability since the performances of experienced and unexperienced operators have not proved to be significantly different. Conclusion: A methodology has been set up to compare tools for cement crowns retrieval. The compressed-air tool has been proved to generally provide a better performance unless more ductile cement is to be broken.

[1]  N. Pop-Jordanova,et al.  Perceived stress in dental practice. , 2013, Prilozi.

[2]  K. Ekberg,et al.  Work organisation, work environment and the use of medical equipment: A survey study of the impact on quality and safety , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[3]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Medical device development: the challenge for ergonomics. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  R. Moore,et al.  Dentists' perceived stress and its relation to perceptions about anxious patients. , 2001, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[5]  G. Box.  Some Theorems on Quadratic Forms Applied in the Study of Analysis of Variance Problems, I. Effect of Inequality of Variance in the One-Way Classification , 1954 .

[6]  Stefan Wolfart,et al.  Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  Liam D Addy,et al.  Crown and bridge disassembly--when, why and how. , 2007, Dental update.

[8]  E. Zanetti,et al.  In vitro standardization of two different removal devices in cemented implant prosthesis. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  Z. Li,et al.  Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  Ergonomics Analysis in the Industrial Design of Medical Instrument Products , 2009 .

[11]  G R. Rahul,et al.  Removal of failed crown and bridge , 2012, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.

[12]  Cristina Bignardi,et al.  Structural analysis of skeletal body elements: numerical and experimental methods , 2009 .

[13]  C. Bignardi,et al.  Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  Cristina Bignardi,et al.  A preliminary in vivo trial of load transfer in mandibular implant-retained overdentures anchored in 2 different ways: allowing and counteracting free rotation. , 2006, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[15]  Erik Liljegren,et al.  Usability in a medical technology context assessment of methods for usability evaluation of medical equipment , 2006 .