Airports with shared runway operations between arrivals and departures can experience severe departure gridlock and delays during a heavy arrival push due to insufficient gaps in the arrival stream for aircraft to depart. The problem is accentuated in situations when a large gap in the arrival spacing has to be created at the last minute due to wake vortex separation requirements. At LaGuardia airport, wake vortex separation problems arise when a heavy jet, such as a B757, departing on Runway 31 needs additional spacing between arrivals on Runway 22. A standard solution for controllers in many airports in situations such as this is to extend the downwind leg of arrival aircraft to create extra space between the arrivals. The question addressed in this paper is how such route extensions would work with terminal scheduling operations, namely (1) the Terminal Sequencing and Spacing (TSS) tools and (2) a new scheduling tool which increases the availability of gaps for departure aircraft-Departure Sensitive Arrival Spacing (DSAS). In a simulated LaGuardia airport (LGA) Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) airspace, two new RNAV arrival routes were created along with extensions to these routes. The arrival route from the south had a downwind leg extension near the airport in the final sector. The arrival route from the north had an extension in a feeder sector further from the airport. An exploratory one-hour run with the route extensions was compared to an hour run without the extensions. Topics included in this paper are 1) how the route extensions were developed, 2) a procedure outlining how the aircraft could be scheduled to the extensions and who would do it, and 3) the results of the exploratory run compared to the original run without the extensions. The results indicated that the extended downwind leg route helped to create a B757 departure gap in the middle of a packed arrival stream, resulting in a reduction of 11 minutes in average wait time for the B757s, but at a cost of increased controller self-reported workload from low to moderate.
[1]
Zheng Tao,et al.
Automated Integration of Arrival/Departure Schedules
,
2013
.
[2]
Jaewoo Jung,et al.
Assessing Resilience of Scheduled Performance-Based Navigation Arrival Operations
,
2015
.
[3]
Jaewoo Jung,et al.
Arrival Scheduling with Shortcut Path Options and Mixed Aircraft Performance
,
2015
.
[4]
Oliver Ohneiser,et al.
Trawl-Net Technology for Timely Precise Air Traffic Controller Turn-To-Base Commands
,
2015
.
[5]
Paul U. Lee,et al.
The Effectiveness of a Route Crossing Tool in a Simulated New York Airspace
,
2015
.
[6]
Thomas Prevot,et al.
Human-In-the-Loop Evaluation of NextGen Concepts in the Airspace Operations Laboratory
,
2010
.
[7]
Lynne Martin,et al.
Controller Support Tools for Schedule-Based Terminal-Area Operations
,
2011
.
[8]
Jeffrey Homola,et al.
Reducing Departure Delays at LaGuardia Airport with Departure-Sensitive Arrival Spacing (DSAS) Operations
,
2015
.
[9]
Lynne Martin,et al.
Design and Evaluation of the Terminal Area Precision Scheduling and Spacing System
,
2011
.
[10]
Paul Lee,et al.
Development of a route crossing tool for shared airspace environments
,
2014,
2014 IEEE/AIAA 33rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).
[11]
Lynne Martin,et al.
Evaluation of the Terminal Sequencing and Spacing system for Performance-Based Navigation arrivals
,
2013,
2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).