Fully automated intensity compensation for confocal microscopic images

One well‐recognized problem in three‐dimensional (3D) confocal microscopic images is that the intensities in deeper slices are generally weaker than those in shallower slices. The loss of intensity with depth hampers both qualitative observation and quantitative measurement of specimens. Two major types of methods exist to compensate for this intensity loss: the first is based on the geometrical optics inside the specimen, and the second applies an empirical parametric intensity decay function (IDF) of depth. A common feature shared by both methods is that they are parameter‐dependent. However, for the optics‐based method there are as yet no fully automated parameter‐setting approaches; and for the IDF method the traditional profile‐fitting approach cannot provide proper parameters if the presumed IDF model does not match the experimental intensity–depth profile of the 3D image. In this paper, we propose a novel maximum‐entropy (ME) approach to fully automated parameter‐setting. In principle the ME approach is suitable for any compensation method as long as it is parameter‐dependent. The basic assumption is that without intensity loss an ideal 3D image should be generally homogeneous with respect to depth and this axial homogeneity can be represented by the entropy of a normalized intensity–depth profile. Experiments on real confocal images showed that such a profile was consistent with visual evaluation of axial intensity homogeneity and that the ME approach could provide proper parameters for both compensation methods mentioned above. Moreover, for the IDF method, experiments on both real and simulated data showed that the ME approach could provide more precise parameters than with traditional profile‐fitting. The Appendix provides a proof that under certain conditions the global maximization of the profile‐entropy is guaranteed.

[1]  K. Rodenacker,et al.  Groping for Quantitative Digital 3-D Image Analysis: An Approach to Quantitative Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Thick Tissue Sections of Prostate Carcinoma , 1997, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[2]  R. Bevensee Maximum entropy solutions to scientific problems , 1992 .

[3]  P. Oostveldt,et al.  Heterogeneous photobleaching in confocal microscopy caused by differences in refractive index and excitation mode. , 1998, Cytometry.

[4]  B B Chaudhuri,et al.  Some efficient methods to correct confocal images for easy interpretation. , 2001, Micron.

[5]  Jose-Angel Conchello,et al.  Fluorescence photobleaching correction for expectation-maximization algorithm , 1995, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  C. Kervrann,et al.  Robust incremental compensation of the light attenuation with depth in 3D fluorescence microscopy , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[7]  Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al.  Fast Attenuation Correction in Fluorescence Confocal Imaging: A Recursive Approach , 1994 .

[8]  A. M. Downs,et al.  Three-dimensional DNA image cytometry by confocal scanning laser microscopy in thick tissue blocks. , 1991, Cytometry.

[9]  Elijah Polak,et al.  Optimization: Algorithms and Consistent Approximations , 1997 .

[10]  J. Conchello,et al.  Artefacts in restored images due to intensity loss in three‐dimensional fluorescence microscopy , 2001, Journal of microscopy.

[11]  F. Margadant,et al.  A precise light attenuation correction for confocal scanning microscopy with O(n4/3) computing time and O(n) memory requirements for n voxels , 1996 .

[12]  J. Vassy,et al.  High-resolution three-dimensional images from confocal scanning laser microscopy. Quantitative study and mathematical correction of the effects from bleaching and fluorescence attenuation in depth. , 1991, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[13]  T Lindmo,et al.  Fading correction for fluorescence quantitation in confocal microscopy. , 1996, Cytometry.

[14]  Jos B. T. M. Roerdink,et al.  An FFT‐based method for attenuation correction in fluorescence confocal microscopy , 1993 .

[15]  Badrinath Roysam,et al.  A hybrid 3D watershed algorithm incorporating gradient cues and object models for automatic segmentation of nuclei in confocal image stacks , 2003, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[16]  O. A L-Ko F A H I,et al.  Attenuation correction in confocal laser microscopes : a novel two-view approach , 2003 .

[17]  Frans C. A. Groen,et al.  Absorption and scattering correction in fluorescence confocal microscopy , 1991 .

[18]  Stefan Wuertz,et al.  DEPTH INTENSITY CORRECTION OF BIOFILM VOLUME DATA FROM CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPES , 2001 .

[19]  A Liljeborg,et al.  A method to compensate for light attenuation with depth in three‐dimensional DNA image cytometry using a confocal scanning laser microscope , 1995, Journal of microscopy.