Evoked potentials in large-scale cortical networks elicited by TMS of the visual cortex.

Single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) result in distal and long-lasting oscillations, a finding directly challenging the virtual lesion hypothesis. Previous research supporting this finding has primarily come from stimulation of the motor cortex. We have used single-pulse TMS with simultaneous EEG to target seven brain regions, six of which belong to the visual system [left and right primary visual area V1, motion-sensitive human middle temporal cortex, and a ventral temporal region], as determined with functional MRI-guided neuronavigation, and a vertex "control" site to measure the network effects of the TMS pulse. We found the TMS-evoked potential (TMS-EP) over visual cortex consists mostly of site-dependent theta- and alphaband oscillations. These site-dependent oscillations extended beyond the stimulation site to functionally connected cortical regions and correspond to time windows where the EEG responses maximally diverge (40, 200, and 385 ms). Correlations revealed two site-independent oscillations ∼350 ms after the TMS pulse: a theta-band oscillation carried by the frontal cortex, and an alpha-band oscillation over parietal and frontal cortical regions. A manipulation of stimulation intensity at one stimulation site (right hemisphere V1-V3) revealed sensitivity to the stimulation intensity at different regions of cortex, evidence of intensity tuning in regions distal to the site of stimulation. Together these results suggest that a TMS pulse applied to the visual cortex has a complex effect on brain function, engaging multiple brain networks functionally connected to the visual system with both invariant and site-specific spatiotemporal dynamics. With this characterization of TMS, we propose an alternative to the virtual lesion hypothesis. Rather than a technique that simulates lesions, we propose TMS generates natural brain signals and engages functional networks.

[1]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Spontaneous locally restricted EEG alpha activity determines cortical excitability in the motor cortex , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience – virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  M. Farah,et al.  A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  P. Nunez Toward a quantitative description of large-scale neocortical dynamic function and EEG , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  M. Massimini,et al.  Natural Frequencies of Human Corticothalamic Circuits , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Matti Stenroos,et al.  A Matlab library for solving quasi-static volume conduction problems using the boundary element method , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[7]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  Approximate Entropy-Based Epileptic EEG Detection Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[8]  Thomas Kammer,et al.  Phosphenes and transient scotomas induced by magnetic stimulation of the occipital lobe: their topographic relationship , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT: a test of perceptual memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  P. Fox,et al.  Column‐based model of electric field excitation of cerebral cortex , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Positron Emission Tomography: A New Method for Studying Connectivity of the Human Cerebral Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  V. Amassian,et al.  Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  A. Ziehe,et al.  A LINEAR LEAST-SQUARES ALGORITHM FOR JOINT DIAGONALIZATION , 2003 .

[14]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[16]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Double dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in visual awareness. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  The Activation Function of TMS on a Finite Element Model of a Cortical Sulcus , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[18]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[19]  D. Rothman,et al.  Meeting Report: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Studies of Human Cognition , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Discrimination Training Alters Object Representations in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[22]  Jeffrey S. Johnson,et al.  Using EEG to Explore How rTMS Produces Its Effects on Behavior , 2009, Brain Topography.

[23]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Modeling of the stimulating field generation in TMS. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[24]  Tomáš Paus,et al.  The neural response to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. I. Intracortical and cortico-cortical contributions , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  P. Nunez,et al.  Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995 .

[26]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  Echoplanar BOLD fMRI of brain activation induced by concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[27]  R. Hanajima,et al.  Differences in after-effect between monophasic and biphasic high-frequency rTMS of the human motor cortex , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Frontal and Parietal Influences on Human Occipital Cortex: Direct Confirmation with Concurrent TMS–fMRI , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  V. Walsh,et al.  Diffusion tensor MRI-based estimation of the influence of brain tissue anisotropy on the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  Prof. Dr. Valentino Braitenberg,et al.  Anatomy of the Cortex , 1991, Studies of Brain Function.

[31]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Modeling motor connectivity using TMS/PET and structural equation modeling , 2008, NeuroImage.

[32]  Paul L. Nunez,et al.  The surface laplacian, high resolution EEG and controversies , 2005, Brain Topography.

[33]  M. Erb,et al.  The influence of current direction on phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  B. Meyer,et al.  Influence of pulse configuration and direction of coil current on excitatory effects of magnetic motor cortex and nerve stimulation , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  B. Day,et al.  Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[37]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[38]  J C Rothwell,et al.  The polarity of the induced electric field influences magnetic coil inhibition of human visual cortex: implications for the site of excitation. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  M. Petrides,et al.  Cortico‐cortical connectivity of the human mid‐dorsolateral frontal cortex and its modulation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001 .

[40]  Giorgio Fuggetta,et al.  Modulation of cortical oscillatory activities induced by varying single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity over the left primary motor area: A combined EEG and TMS study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[41]  A. Milner,et al.  The role of V5/MT+ in the control of catching movements: an rTMS study , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Peter T. Fox,et al.  Imaging human intra‐cerebral connectivity by PET during TMS , 1997, Neuroreport.

[43]  J. Fermaglich Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[44]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  fMRI of human visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[45]  E Corthout,et al.  Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[46]  D. Heeger,et al.  Two Retinotopic Visual Areas in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Jared Rutter,et al.  Regulation of Clock and NPAS2 DNA Binding by the Redox State of NAD Cofactors , 2001, Science.

[48]  J. Rothwell,et al.  What is excited by near-threshold twin magnetic stimuli over human cerebral cortex? , 1998 .

[49]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[50]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: A TMS/EEG co-registration study , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[52]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Transient visual field defects induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over human occipital pole , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  Harumasa Takano,et al.  Functional connectivity revealed by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  R. Galuske,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in cerebral cortical networks , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[55]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity , 1997, Neuroreport.

[56]  F Babiloni,et al.  High resolution EEG: a new model-dependent spatial deblurring method using a realistically-shaped MR-constructed subject's head model. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[57]  Robin Laycock,et al.  Evidence for fast signals and later processing in human V1/V2 and V5/MT+: A TMS study of motion perception. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation produces intensity-dependent EEG responses in humans , 2005, NeuroImage.

[59]  T. M. Mayhew,et al.  Anatomy of the Cortex: Statistics and Geometry. , 1991 .

[60]  A T Barker,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Which part of the current waveform causes the stimulation? , 2001, Experimental brain research.

[61]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[62]  M. Hallett,et al.  Optimal Focal Transcranial Magnetic Activation of the Human Motor Cortex: Effects of Coil Orientation, Shape of the Induced Current Pulse, and Stimulus Intensity , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[63]  D. Bradley,et al.  Structure and function of visual area MT. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[64]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  A shift of visual spatial attention is selectively associated with human EEG alpha activity , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[65]  Zafiris J Daskalakis,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a new investigational and treatment tool in psychiatry. , 2002, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[66]  D. Strauss,et al.  Adaptive Time-Scale Feature Extraction in Electroencephalographic Responses To Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[67]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The temporal characteristics of motion processing in hMT/V5+: Combining fMRI and neuronavigated TMS , 2006, NeuroImage.

[68]  T. Paus,et al.  Synchronization of neuronal activity in the human primary motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation: an EEG study. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[69]  P. Basser,et al.  Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: A modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[70]  J. Gross,et al.  On the Role of Prestimulus Alpha Rhythms over Occipito-Parietal Areas in Visual Input Regulation: Correlation or Causation? , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  B U Meyer,et al.  Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[72]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Functional MRI of cortical activations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) , 2001, Neuroreport.

[73]  S. Anand,et al.  The selectivity and timing of motion processing in human temporo–parieto–occipital and occipital cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[74]  Gerald M. Edelman,et al.  The Remembered Present; A Biological Theory of Consciousness. , 1994 .

[75]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[76]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness , 2001, Science.

[77]  Y. Terao,et al.  Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[78]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.