Balancing design freedom and brand recognition in the evolution of automotive brand styling

Designers faced with the task of developing the next model of a brand must balance several considerations. The design must be novel and express attributes important to the customers, while also recognizable as a representative of the brand. This balancing is left to the intuition of the designers, who must anticipate how all customers will perceive the new design. Oftentimes, the design freedom used to meet a styling attribute such as aggressiveness can compromise the recognition of the product as a member of the brand. In this paper, an experiment is conducted measuring change in ten styling attributes common to both design freedom and brand recognition for automotive designs, using customer responses to vehicle designs created interactively. Results show that, while brand recognition is highly dependent on the particular manufacturer, tradeoffs between design freedom and brand recognition may be measured using predictive models to inform strategic design decisions.Copyright © 2015 by ASME

[1]  Alex Burnap,et al.  Quantification of perceptual design attributes using a crowd , 2013 .

[2]  Katja Hölttä-Otto,et al.  Contribution of visual design elements to the perceived product family look , 2012 .

[3]  Egon Ostrosi,et al.  Styling of cars: is there a relationship between the style of cars and the culture identity of a specific country? , 2015 .

[4]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Nearest neighbor analysis of psychological spaces. , 1986 .

[5]  Yi Ren,et al.  Improving Design Preference Prediction Accuracy Using Feature Learning , 2016 .

[6]  A. Rangaswamy,et al.  The Emergence of Dominant Designs , 2006 .

[7]  Glen Mullineux,et al.  Visually decomposing vehicle images: Exploring the influence of different aesthetic features on consumer perception of brand , 2012 .

[8]  P. Louridas,et al.  Design as Bricolage: Anthropology Meets Design Thinking , 1999 .

[9]  Peter H. Bloch.  Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[10]  Bernd H. Schmitt.  The consumer psychology of brands , 2012 .

[11]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Informing Early Design via Crowd-Based Co-Creation , 2015 .

[12]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affect and machine design: Lessons for the development of autonomous machines , 2003, IBM Syst. J..

[13]  Rahul Rai,et al.  Human factors study on the usage of BCI headset for 3D CAD modeling , 2014, Comput. Aided Des..

[14]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Evolutive Design of Car Silhouettes , 2008, DAC 2008.

[15]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Brand Synthesis: The Multidimensionality of Brand Knowledge , 2003 .

[16]  Yi Ren,et al.  When Crowdsourcing Fails: A Study of Expertise on Crowdsourced Design Evaluation , 2015 .

[17]  H. Freud.  Emotional Design Why We Love Or Hate Everyday Things , 2016 .

[18]  B. Merrilees,et al.  The performance benefits of being brand‐orientated , 2008 .

[19]  Angela Dumas,et al.  Using metaphors in new brand design , 1997 .

[20]  Dirk Snelders,et al.  Should new products look similar or different?The influence of the market environment on strategic product styling , 2008 .

[21]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Managing Brand Equity , 1991 .

[22]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Get another label? improving data quality and data mining using multiple, noisy labelers , 2008, KDD.

[23]  P. Hekkert,et al.  'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[24]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Eliciting Consumer Preferences Using Robust Adaptive Choice Questionnaires , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[25]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[26]  M. Pontil,et al.  A Convex Optimization Approach to Modeling Consumer Heterogeneity in Conjoint Estimation , 2007 .

[27]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Modelling perceptions of craftsmanship in vehicle interior design , 2011 .

[28]  Alain Bernard,et al.  The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[29]  Daniela Faas,et al.  The influence of immersion and presence in early stage engineering designing and building , 2014, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[30]  Peter R.N. Childs,et al.  Total Vehicle Technology: Challenging Current Thinking , 2001 .

[31]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Quantification of perceived environmental friendliness for vehicle silhouette design , 2010 .

[32]  Georges M. Fadel,et al.  A physically-based shape morphing algorithm for packing and layout applications , 2015 .

[33]  Claudia Baier,et al.  Principles Of Optimal Design Modeling And Computation , 2016 .

[34]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Automatically Inferring Metrics for Design Creativity , 2013 .

[35]  Jay McCormack,et al.  Speaking the Buick Language: Capturing, Understanding, and Exploring Brand Identity With Shape Grammars , 2004 .

[36]  Paul E. Green,et al.  A General Approach to Product Design Optimization via Conjoint Analysis , 1981 .

[37]  Jitesh H. Panchal.  USING CROWDS IN ENGINEERING DESIGN – TOWARDS A HOLISTIC FRAMEWORK , 2015 .

[38]  Robert Kreuzbauer,et al.  Embodied Cognition and New Product Design: Changing Product Form to Influence Brand Categorization , 2005 .

[39]  Wouter Eggink,et al.  Brand value by design: the use of three levels of recognition in design , 2013 .

[40]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[41]  Peter R.N. Childs,et al.  The styling process , 2001 .

[42]  Kristina Shea,et al.  Improving design grammar development and application through network-based analysis of transition graphs , 2016, Design Science.

[43]  Panos Y. Papalambros.  AN ENTERPRIZE CONTEXT FOR DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 2002 .

[44]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Capturing a rebel: modeling the Harley-Davidson brand through a motorcycle shape grammar , 2002 .

[45]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Studies of similarity , 1978 .

[46]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Quantifying Aesthetic Form Preference in a Utility Function , 2008 .

[47]  Matthew Lease,et al.  SQUARE: A Benchmark for Research on Computing Crowd Consensus , 2013, HCOMP.

[48]  Erin F. MacDonald,et al.  Impact of Product Design Representation on Customer Judgment , 2013 .

[49]  S. Fienberg,et al.  The Clockwork Muse: The Predictability of Artistic Change. , 1991 .

[50]  Conrad S. Tucker,et al.  Trend Mining for Predictive Product Design , 2011 .

[51]  D. Snelders,et al.  Brand Styles in Commercial Design , 2010, Design Issues.

[52]  Cameron Watt,et al.  Brands and breakthroughs: How brands help focus creative decision making , 2006 .

[53]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[54]  Alex Burnap,et al.  CROWDSOURCING: A PRIMER AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING , 2012 .

[55]  Yi Ren,et al.  ON DESIGN PREFERENCE ELICITATION WITH CROWD IMPLICIT FEEDBACK , 2012 .

[56]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The Meaning of “Near” and “Far”: The Impact of Structuring Design Databases and the Effect of Distance of Analogy on Design Output , 2012 .

[57]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Preference Inconsistency in Multidisciplinary Design Decision Making , 2007, DAC 2007.

[58]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Metrics for Assessing Design Freedom and Information Certainty in the Early Stages of Design , 1998 .

[59]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design , 1998 .

[60]  Harrison Hyung Min Kim,et al.  Demand trend mining for predictive life cycle design , 2014 .

[61]  Emilie Poirson,et al.  Eliciting User Perceptions Using Assessment Tests Based on an Interactive Genetic Algorithm , 2013 .

[62]  V. Zeithaml.  Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[63]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  More than fun and money. Worker Motivation in Crowdsourcing - A Study on Mechanical Turk , 2011, AMCIS.

[64]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  zPots: a virtual pottery experience with spatial interactions using the leap motion device , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[65]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk , 2008, CHI.

[66]  Olga Sorkine-Hornung,et al.  On Linear Variational Surface Deformation Methods , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[67]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  The Impact of Example Modality and Physical Interactions on Design Creativity , 2014 .

[68]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Measuring ordinal association in situations that contain tied scores. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[69]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design , 2004 .

[70]  Dirk Snelders,et al.  Complementing intuition: insights on styling as a strategic tool , 2007 .

[71]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Experiential Conjoint Analysis: An Experience-Based Method for Eliciting, Capturing, and Modeling Consumer Preference , 2014 .

[72]  F. Mannering,et al.  Brand Loyalty and the Decline of American Automobile Firms , 1991 .

[73]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Quantification of Classical Gestalt Principles in Two-Dimensional Product Representations , 2015 .

[74]  Heiko Gewald,et al.  Does Money Matter? Motivational Factors for Participation in Paid- and Non-Profit-Crowdsourcing Communities , 2013, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[75]  Levent Burak Kara,et al.  Semantic shape editing using deformation handles , 2015, ACM Trans. Graph..

[76]  Jaap E. Wieringa,et al.  What about design newness? Investigating the relevance of a neglected dimension of product innovativeness , 2009 .

[77]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Communicating Consumer Needs in the Design Process of Branded Products , 2015 .

[78]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Multiagent Shape Grammar Implementation: Automatically Generating Form Concepts According to a Preference Function , 2009 .

[79]  Levent Burak Kara,et al.  Deciphering the Influence of Product Shape on Consumer Judgments Through Geometric Abstraction , 2015 .

[80]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Understanding Consumer Tradeoffs Between Form and Function Through Metaconjoint and Cognitive Neuroscience Analyses , 2013 .

[81]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Example-based conceptual styling framework for automotive shapes , 2007, SBIM '07.

[82]  Jean-François Petiot,et al.  Preference-oriented form design: application to cars’ headlights , 2009 .

[83]  Matthew I. Campbell,et al.  Layout synthesis of fluid channels using generative graph grammars , 2014, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[84]  Qifang Bao,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION ON THE INCONSISTENCY OF CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR PRODUCT APPEARANCE: A CASE STUDY OF RESIDENTIAL SOLAR PANELS , 2014 .