Characterization of Piezoelectric Material Parameters Through a Global Optimization Algorithm

Better understanding of the loss mechanisms and higher confidence in material data for piezoelectric materials are very important for transducer manufacturers. In this paper, a method is described to characterize these loss mechanisms using a global optimization algorithm, a 1-D equivalent circuit, and a simple experimental measurement. Two different cost functions were used in the optimization algorithm, one based on impedance and the other based on admittance. The sensitivities of these cost functions to the parameters being characterized are shown to be nonuniform. The results are compared to the results obtained from a local optimization method to show the advantage of using a global optimization algorithm. A way to quantify the uncertainty of the results is introduced by looking at the difference between the results obtained from the two different cost functions. It is shown here that the more ambient noise there is in the data, the wider the gap between the results found by the two cost functions. However, although the results from the individual cost functions diverge from the correct values with increasing noise, the average of the two cost function results remains within $5\%$ of the original value. Hence, even with noise in the measured data, the use of two cost functions can yield accurate material parameters.

[1]  Felix,et al.  Comparison of several methods to characterise the high frequency behaviour of piezoelectric ceramics for transducer applications , 2000, Ultrasonics.

[2]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  An Interior Point Algorithm for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[3]  Stewart Sherrit,et al.  High Temperature, High Power Piezoelectric Composite Transducers , 2014, Sensors.

[4]  Fred W. Glover,et al.  Scatter Search and Local Nlp Solvers: A Multistart Framework for Global Optimization , 2006, INFORMS J. Comput..

[5]  Stefan J. Rupitsch,et al.  Complete characterization of piezoceramic materials by means of two block-shaped test samples , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[6]  C Richard,et al.  Selecting passive and active materials for 1.3 composite power transducers. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[7]  Wei Ren,et al.  Temperature dependence of the complete material coefficients matrix of soft and hard doped piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate ceramics , 2007 .

[8]  B. Kaltenbacher,et al.  FEM-Based determination of real and complex elastic, dielectric, and piezoelectric moduli in piezoceramic materials , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  K. Uchino,et al.  Loss mechanisms in piezoelectrics: how to measure different losses separately , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  Emílio Carlos Nelli Silva,et al.  Determination of full piezoelectric complex parameters using gradient-based optimization algorithm , 2016 .

[11]  Kenji Uchino,et al.  LOSS DETERMINATION METHODOLOGY FOR A PIEZOELECTRIC CERAMIC: NEW PHENOMENOLOGICAL THEORY AND EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSALS , 2011 .

[12]  C. Choy,et al.  Evaluation of the material parameters of piezoelectric materials by various methods , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  R. Lerch,et al.  Inverse Method to estimate material parameters for piezoceramic disc actuators , 2009 .

[14]  Yongrae Roh,et al.  Determination of the complex material constants of PMN–28%PT piezoelectric single crystals , 2013 .

[15]  B. Aronov,et al.  Energy analysis of a piezoelectric body under nonuniform deformation. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R. Holland,et al.  Representation of Dielectric, Elastic, and Piezoelectric Losses by Complex Coefficients , 1967, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[17]  Fred W. Glover,et al.  A Template for Scatter Search and Path Relinking , 1997, Artificial Evolution.

[18]  V. Murray,et al.  Thermal generation, diffusion and dissipation in 1-3 piezocomposite sonar transducers: finite element analysis and experimental measurements , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[19]  Charles H. Sherman,et al.  Transducers and Arrays for Underwater Sound , 2008 .

[20]  Y. Bar-Cohen,et al.  Comparison of the Mason and KLM equivalent circuits for piezoelectric resonators in the thickness mode , 1999, 1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. International Symposium (Cat. No.99CH37027).

[21]  Kenji Uchino,et al.  Development of a High Power Piezoelectric Characterization System and Its Application for Resonance/Antiresonance Mode Characterization , 2009 .

[22]  Lars Hoff,et al.  Characterising piezoelectric material parameters through a 3D FEM and optimisation algorithm , 2017, OCEANS 2017 - Aberdeen.

[23]  Shujun Zhang,et al.  Design of low-loss 1-3 piezoelectric composites for high-power transducer applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[24]  Yuan-Ping Liu,et al.  Analyses of the Heat Dissipated by Losses in a Piezoelectric Transformer , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  Mohamed S. Gadala,et al.  Self-heat generation in piezoelectric stack actuators used in fuel injectors , 2009 .