The behavior of high-CAPE summer convection in large-domain large-eddy simulations with ICON

Abstract. Current state of the art regional numerical weather prediction (NWP) models employ kilometre scale horizontal grid resolutions thereby simulating convection within its grey-zone. Increasing resolution leads to resolving the 3D motion field and has been shown to improve the representation of clouds and precipitation. Using a hectometer-scale model in forecasting mode on a large domain therefore offers a chance to study processes that require the simulation of the 3D motion field at small horizontal scales, such as deep summertime moist convection, a notorious problem in NWP. We use the Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic weather and climate model in large-eddy simulation mode (ICON-LEM) to simulate deep moist convection distinguishing between scattered, large scale dynamically forced and frontal convection. We use different ground and satellite based observational data sets, that supply information on ice water content and path, ice cloud cover and cloud top height on a similar scale as the simulations, in order to evaluate and constrain our model simulations. We find that the timing and geometric extent of the convectively generated cloud shield agrees well with observations while the life time of the convective anvil was, at least in one case, significantly overestimated. Given the large uncertainties of individual ice water path observations, we use a suite of observations in order to better constrain the simulations. ICON-LEM simulates cloud ice water path that lies in-between the different observational data sets but simulations appear to be biased towards a large frozen water path (all frozen hydrometeors). The bias in frozen water path and the longevity of the anvil are little affected by modifications of parameters within the microphysical scheme. In particular one of our convective days appeared to be very sensitive to the initial and boundary conditions which had a large impact on the convective triggering, but little impact on the high frozen water path and long anvil life time bias. Based on this limited set of sensitivity experiments, the evolution of locally forced convection appears to depend more on the uncertainty of the large-scale dynamical state based on data assimilation than of microphysical parameters. Overall, we judge ICON-LEM simulations of deep moist convection to be very close to observations regarding timing, geometrical structure and cloud ice water path of the convective anvil, but other frozen hydrometeors, in particular graupel, are likely overestimated. Therefore, ICON-LEM supplies important information for weather forecasting and forms a good basis for parameterization development based on physical processes or machine learning.

[1]  C. Moseley,et al.  Impact of resolution on large-eddy simulation of midlatitude summertime convection , 2020 .

[2]  B. Stevens,et al.  The Added Value of Large-eddy and Storm-resolving Models for Simulating Clouds and Precipitation , 2020 .

[3]  H. Rybka High-CAPE summer convection in large-domain large-eddy simulations with ICON - model and observational data sets , 2020 .

[4]  V. Schemann,et al.  Simulation of mixed-phase clouds with the ICON large-eddy model in the complex Arctic environment around Ny-Ålesund , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[5]  P. Seifert,et al.  Detection and attribution of aerosol-cloud interactions in large-domain large-eddy simulations with ICON , 2019 .

[6]  S. Bony,et al.  A New Look at the Daily Cycle of Trade Wind Cumuli , 2019, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[7]  D. Klocke,et al.  Pair Correlations and Spatial Statistics of Deep Convection over the Tropical Atlantic , 2019, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences.

[8]  P. Eriksson,et al.  Towards an operational Ice Cloud Imager (ICI) retrieval product , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[9]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Global Cloud Detection for CERES Edition 4 Using Terra and Aqua MODIS Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  H. Deneke,et al.  The sub-adiabatic model as a concept for evaluating the representation and radiative effects of low-level clouds in a high-resolution atmospheric model , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[11]  H. Deneke,et al.  How organized is deep convection over Germany? , 2019, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[12]  C. Hoose,et al.  Aerosol‐Cloud‐Precipitation Interactions in the Context of Convective Self‐Aggregation , 2019, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[13]  P. Eriksson,et al.  An update on global atmospheric ice estimates from satellite observations and reanalyses , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[14]  J. Strandgren The life cycle of anvil cirrus clouds from a combination of passive and active satellite remote sensing , 2018 .

[15]  D. Klocke,et al.  Investigating the predictability of a Mediterranean tropical‐like cyclone using a storm‐resolving model , 2018, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[16]  D. Klocke,et al.  Size-Resolved Evaluation of Simulated Deep Tropical Convection , 2018, Monthly Weather Review.

[17]  B. Stevens,et al.  The Impact of Vertical Mixing Biases in Large‐Eddy Simulation on Nocturnal Low Clouds , 2018, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[18]  N. Bormann,et al.  An update on the RTTOV fast radiative transfer model (currently at version 12) , 2018 .

[19]  L. Bugliaro,et al.  Characterisation of the artificial neural network CiPS for cirrus cloud remote sensing with MSG/SEVIRI , 2017 .

[20]  Frank Sehnke,et al.  Cirrus cloud retrieval with MSG/SEVIRI using artificial neural networks , 2017 .

[21]  Timo Hanschmann,et al.  The MSG-SEVIRI-based cloud property data record CLAAS-2 , 2017 .

[22]  C. Hohenegger,et al.  Effect of Soil Moisture on Diurnal Convection and Precipitation in Large-Eddy Simulations , 2017 .

[23]  Hartwig Deneke,et al.  Large‐eddy simulations over Germany using ICON: a comprehensive evaluation , 2017 .

[24]  Steven Platnick,et al.  The MODIS Cloud Optical and Microphysical Products: Collection 6 Updates and Examples From Terra and Aqua , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  I. Tegen,et al.  Parameterizing cloud condensation nuclei concentrations during HOPE , 2016 .

[26]  S. Bony,et al.  Thermodynamic control of anvil cloud amount , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Characterizing and Understanding Cloud Ice and Radiation Budget Biases in Global Climate Models and Reanalysis , 2016 .

[28]  Steven D. Miller,et al.  Estimating nocturnal opaque ice cloud optical depth from MODIS multispectral infrared radiances using a neural network method , 2016 .

[29]  Günther Zängl,et al.  Large eddy simulation using the general circulation model ICON , 2015 .

[30]  Anthony J. Baran,et al.  A new ice cloud parameterization for infrared radiative transfer simulation of cloudy radiances: Evaluation and optimization with IIR observations and ice cloud profile retrieval products , 2015 .

[31]  Guosheng Liu,et al.  The Characteristics of Ice Cloud Properties Derived fromCloudSatandCALIPSOMeasurements , 2015 .

[32]  G. Craig,et al.  Upscale Error Growth in a High-Resolution Simulation of a Summertime Weather Event over Europe* , 2015 .

[33]  G. Zängl,et al.  The ICON (ICOsahedral Non‐hydrostatic) modelling framework of DWD and MPI‐M: Description of the non‐hydrostatic dynamical core , 2015 .

[34]  I. Tegen,et al.  Seasonal variability of Saharan desert dust and ice nucleating particles over Europe , 2014 .

[35]  J. Reichardt Cloud and Aerosol Spectroscopy with Raman Lidar , 2014 .

[36]  A. Lock,et al.  Seamless Stratocumulus Simulation across the Turbulent Gray Zone , 2014 .

[37]  Jana Mendrok,et al.  SPARE‐ICE: Synergistic ice water path from passive operational sensors , 2014 .

[38]  C. Keil,et al.  The convective adjustment time‐scale as indicator of predictability of convective precipitation , 2014 .

[39]  L. Bugliaro,et al.  Microphysical properties and high ice water content in continental and oceanic mesoscale convective systems and potential implications for commercial aircraft at flight altitude , 2013 .

[40]  S. Bony,et al.  What Are Climate Models Missing? , 2013, Science.

[41]  Steven J. Woolnough,et al.  The Effects of Explicit versus Parameterized Convection on the MJO in a Large-Domain High-Resolution Tropical Case Study. Part I: Characterization of Large-Scale Organization and Propagation* , 2013 .

[42]  R. Hogan,et al.  Mixing‐length controls on high‐resolution simulations of convective storms , 2013 .

[43]  S. A. Buehler,et al.  Systematic and random errors between collocated satellite ice water path observations , 2013 .

[44]  A. Arakawa,et al.  A Unified Representation of Deep Moist Convection in Numerical Modeling of the Atmosphere. Part I , 2013 .

[45]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Spectrally Consistent Scattering, Absorption, and Polarization Properties of Atmospheric Ice Crystals at Wavelengths from 0.2 to 100 um , 2013 .

[46]  Ina Mattis,et al.  RAMSES: German Meteorological Service autonomous Raman lidar for water vapor, temperature, aerosol, and cloud measurements. , 2012, Applied optics.

[47]  Duane E. Waliser,et al.  An observationally based evaluation of cloud ice water in CMIP3 and CMIP5 GCMs and contemporary reanalyses using contemporary satellite data , 2012 .

[48]  Ralf Wolke,et al.  Influence of grid resolution and meteorological forcing on simulated European air quality: A sensitivity study with the modeling system COSMO–MUSCAT , 2012 .

[49]  Jason A. Milbrandt,et al.  Sensitivity of Idealized Squall-Line Simulations to the Level of Complexity Used in Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics Schemes , 2012 .

[50]  G. Bryan,et al.  Sensitivity of a Simulated Squall Line to Horizontal Resolution and Parameterization of Microphysics , 2012 .

[51]  Paul Connolly,et al.  A laboratory investigation into the aggregation efficiency of small ice crystals , 2011 .

[52]  B. Mayer,et al.  On the observation of unusual high concentration of small chain-like aggregate ice crystals and large ice water contents near the top of a deep convective cloud during the CIRCLE-2 experiment , 2011 .

[53]  K. D. Beheng,et al.  Aerosol-cloud-precipitation effects over Germany as simulated by a convective-scale numerical weather prediction model , 2011 .

[54]  Zhibo Zhang,et al.  Improvements in Shortwave Bulk Scattering and Absorption Models for the Remote Sensing of Ice Clouds , 2011 .

[55]  Mathias Milz,et al.  Assessing observed and modelled spatial distributions of ice water path using satellite data , 2011 .

[56]  B. Mayer,et al.  Validation of cloud property retrievals with simulated satellite radiances: a case study for SEVIRI , 2010 .

[57]  Oliver Fuhrer,et al.  A Generalization of the SLEVE Vertical Coordinate , 2010 .

[58]  R. Lawson,et al.  Microphysical and radiative properties of tropical clouds investigated in TC4 and NAMMA , 2010 .

[59]  G. Mace,et al.  Tropical composition, cloud and climate coupling experiment validation for cirrus cloud profiling retrieval using cloudsat radar and CALIPSO lidar , 2010 .

[60]  R. Hogan,et al.  Combined CloudSat-CALIPSO-MODIS retrievals of the properties of ice clouds , 2010 .

[61]  D. Winker,et al.  Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms , 2009 .

[62]  M. Wendisch,et al.  Influence of ice crystal shape on retrieval of cirrus optical thickness and effective radius: A case study , 2009 .

[63]  Graeme L. Stephens,et al.  Retrieval of ice cloud microphysical parameters using the CloudSat millimeter‐wave radar and temperature , 2009 .

[64]  W. Tao,et al.  Sensitivity of a Cloud-Resolving Model to Bulk and Explicit Bin Microphysical Schemes. Part II: Cloud Microphysics and Storm Dynamics Interactions , 2009 .

[65]  Sergey Y. Matrosov,et al.  Effects of Multiple Scattering on Attenuation-Based Retrievals of Stratiform Rainfall from CloudSat , 2008 .

[66]  Dong L. Wu,et al.  Cloud ice: A climate model challenge with signs and expectations of progress , 2007 .

[67]  M. Yau,et al.  A Multimoment Bulk Microphysics Parameterization. Part IV: Sensitivity Experiments , 2006 .

[68]  Rob Roebeling,et al.  Cloud property retrievals for climate monitoring: Implications of differences between Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on METEOSAT‐8 and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) on NOAA‐17 , 2006 .

[69]  K. D. Beheng,et al.  A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 1: Model description , 2006 .

[70]  K. D. Beheng,et al.  A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 2: Maritime vs. continental deep convective storms , 2006 .

[71]  R. Hogan,et al.  The Retrieval of Ice Water Content from Radar Reflectivity Factor and Temperature and Its Use in Evaluating a Mesoscale Model , 2006 .

[72]  J. Wyngaard,et al.  Resolution Requirements for the Simulation of Deep Moist Convection , 2003 .

[73]  Ralf Wolke,et al.  The Parallel Model System LM-MUSCAT for Chemistry-Transport Simulations: Coupling Scheme, Parallelization and Applications , 2003, PARCO.

[74]  J. Schmetz,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) , 2002 .

[75]  Yong Wang,et al.  An Explicit Simulation of Tropical Cyclones with a Triply Nested Movable Mesh Primitive Equation Model: TCM3. Part II: Model Refinements and Sensitivity to Cloud Microphysics Parameterization* , 2002 .

[76]  M. Matricardi,et al.  An improved fast radiative transfer model for assimilation of satellite radiance observations , 1999 .

[77]  Piet Stammes,et al.  Scattering matrices of imperfect hexagonal ice crystals , 1998 .

[78]  E. Mlawer,et al.  Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave , 1997 .

[79]  M. King,et al.  Determination of the optical thickness and effective particle radius of clouds from reflected solar , 1990 .

[80]  Andrew J. Heymsfield,et al.  An Improved Approach to Calculating Terminal Velocities of Plate-like Crystals and Graupel , 1987 .

[81]  H. D. Orville,et al.  Bulk Parameterization of the Snow Field in a Cloud Model , 1983 .

[82]  Liu Xinwu This is How the Discussion Started , 1981 .

[83]  D. Lilly,et al.  On the numerical simulation of buoyant convection , 1962 .