Renewable energy in remote communities

Abstract This research has demonstrated that even in a small urbanised country like Britain, communities can still be remote. The paper analyses the nature of remote settlements and suggests that beyond the rural idyll, there are deprived communities. In order to obtain real data, a study area in the North Pennines was selected. The types of remote communities were evident throughout the study area and one of each type was selected for further study. It became clear that villages with an industrial base had most potential, due to high energy demand, vulnerability and community involvement. A village with a high measure of multiple deprivation and suffering from fuel poverty was chosen for a more detailed investigation. Energy demand profiles were developed and candidate technologies nominated. The latter were tested by filters that assessed fitness for application, robustness and autonomy. The most appropriate combinations of technologies were proposed. The residents and their community representatives were involved in the process and recognised the benefits of the proposals to themselves and others.

[1]  Chris Underwood,et al.  The application of fuzzy systems to control and modelling of building systems , 2006 .

[2]  Rj Lowe,et al.  Third annual report , 1992 .

[3]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Stern Review : The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[4]  Peter Midmore,et al.  Impact of the 2001 Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak in Britain: Implications for Rural Studies. , 2004 .

[5]  M. Tanrioven,et al.  Reliability and cost-benefits of adding alternate power sources to an independent micro-grid community , 2005 .

[6]  Jennifer Rogers,et al.  Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects , 2008 .

[7]  C. Philo Neglected rural geographies: A review , 1992 .

[8]  Mohammad S. Alam,et al.  Reliability modeling and analysis of stand-alone PEM fuel cell power plants * , 2006 .

[9]  P. Cloke,et al.  Contested countryside cultures: otherness, marginalisation and rurality. , 1997 .

[10]  Nick Kelly,et al.  A comparative assessment of future heat and power sources for the UK domestic sector , 2006 .

[11]  A. Hubbard What are sustainable communities , 1996 .

[12]  Koen Steemers,et al.  Can microgrids make a major contribution to UK energy supply , 2006 .

[13]  Patrick James,et al.  Urban energy generation: Influence of micro-wind turbine output on electricity consumption in buildings , 2007 .

[14]  P. Prag Renewable Energy in the Countryside , 2005 .

[15]  Woodrow W. Clark,et al.  Distributed generation: remote power systems with advanced storage technologies , 2004 .

[16]  W. Nordhaus The "Stern Review" on the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[17]  Roger G. Marchand,et al.  Micro-generation technology assessment for housing technology , 2004 .

[18]  S. Abu-Sharkha,et al.  Can microgrids make a major contribution to UK energy supply ? , 2005 .

[19]  M. Denscombe The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research projects , 1998 .

[20]  V. I. Ugursal,et al.  Residential cogeneration systems: Review of the current technology , 2006 .

[21]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Appraising renewable energy developments in remote communities: the case of the North Assynt Estate, Scotland , 1999 .

[22]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  Solid oxide fuel cell systems for residential micro-combined heat and power in the UK: Key economic drivers , 2005 .

[23]  C. Potter,et al.  Agricultural change and restructuring: recent evidence from a survey of agricultural households in England , 2004 .

[24]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Energy And Renewable Energy Systems , 2006 .

[25]  V. Ismet Ugursal,et al.  The financial viability of an SOFC cogeneration system in single-family dwellings , 2006 .