Uncertainty: cause or effect of stakeholders' debates? Analysis of a case study: the risk for honeybees of the insecticide Gaucho.

The social construction of uncertainty plays a major role in environmental decision-making. Methods for assessing this aspect of scientific knowledge quality are lacking. Our analysis of the French debate on the risk that the insecticide Gaucho (active substance: imidacloprid) forms for honeybees is particularly relevant to this theoretical and practical gap. Based on our analysis, we propose six knowledge quality criteria that can assist in assessing the information communicated in an argumentative public process: reliability of the information - it must be based on all available scientific knowledge; robustness of the information - it must take into account criticism; use of the information produced by other stakeholders; relevancy of the arguments for issue under debate; logical coherence of the discourse; and legitimacy of the information source. Further, our findings deepen the understanding of the relationships between the social, economic, and institutional stakes of the actors involved in the debate and their strategies of 'creating uncertainty'. Finally, we compare the findings of this case study with the twelve lessons drafted by the European Environmental Agency (EEA) in its report Late lessons from early warnings, and we draft two more lessons. These lessons can be applied to future policy in order to minimize the repetition of past mistakes.

[1]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis , 1979 .

[2]  B. B. Zellner.  Policy Studies: Review Annual , 2018 .

[3]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy , 1990 .

[4]  T. A. van Dijk,et al.  Discourse, power and acces , 1996 .

[5]  P. Kloprogge,et al.  A method for the analysis of assumptions in assessments , 2005 .

[6]  T. V. Dijk.  Discourse, power and access , 1995 .

[7]  G. Arnold,et al.  Modes of honeybees exposure to systemic insecticides: estimated amounts of contaminated pollen and nectar consumed by different categories of bees , 2005 .

[8]  A. Irwin.  Sociology and the Environment , 2001 .

[9]  David Gee,et al.  LATE LESSONS FROM EARLY WARNINGS , 2004 .

[10]  Gerald Assouline,et al.  RHÔNE-POULENC AGROCHIMIE: AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE , 2001 .

[11]  M. Korstanje.  The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .

[12]  John Stone,et al.  Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 2007 .

[13]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[14]  J. Taséi,et al.  New risk assessment approach for systemic insecticides: the case of honey bees and imidacloprid (Gaucho). , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation , 1995 .

[16]  R. Wodak.  Critical Discourse Analysis , 2003 .

[17]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  The Politics of Environmental Discourse , 1997 .

[18]  Teun A. van Dijk,et al.  Discourse as structure and process , 1997 .

[19]  J. Faucon,et al.  A Survey of Pesticide Residues in Pollen Loads Collected by Honey Bees in France , 2006 .

[20]  Thomas Webler,et al.  “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick , 1995 .

[21]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the PostNormal Age , 2001 .

[22]  M. A R I E-P I E R R E H A L M,et al.  New Risk Assessment Approach for Systemic Insecticides : The Case of Honey Bees and Imidacloprid ( Gaucho ) , 2022 .

[23]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Risk management and governance:: a post-normal science approach , 1999 .

[24]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[25]  J. P. van der Sluijs,et al.  Uncertainty, assumptions, and value commitments in the knowledge base of complex environmental problems , 2006 .

[26]  T. V. Dijk.  Discourse as Social Interaction , 1997 .

[27]  Funtowicz Silvio,et al.  Models of Science and Policy , 2007 .

[28]  T. V. Dijk.  The Study of Discourse , 1997 .

[29]  A. Elbert,et al.  Imidacloprid - a new systemic insecticide , 1991 .

[30]  Dorothy Nelkin,et al.  Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions , 1979 .

[31]  P. Arlien‐Søborg,et al.  Science of the Total Environment , 2018 .

[32]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning , 1993 .

[33]  Tomas Hellström,et al.  The science-policy dialogue in transformation: model-uncertainty and environmental policy , 1996 .

[34]  J. Sheyholislami,,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis , 2019, Research Methods for Classroom Discourse.

[35]  B. Wynne.  Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. , 1992 .

[36]  M. Coulthard,et al.  Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis , 1995 .

[37]  Sylvie Faucheux,et al.  Les menaces globales sur l'environnement , 1990 .

[38]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[39]  M. Albornoz.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[40]  R. Löfstedt.  The precautionary principle - Risk, regulation and politics , 2003 .

[41]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[42]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: Insights from the UPEM conference , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[43]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction , 2002 .

[44]  J. Bonmatin,et al.  Quantification of imidacloprid uptake in maize crops. , 2005, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.