Efficient and Accurate Quantification of Uncertainty for Multiphase Flow With the Probabilistic Collocation Method

Summary In this study, we explore an efficient and accurate method for uncertainty analysis of petroleum reservoir simulations. The essence of the approach is the combination of Karhunen-Loeve (KL) expansion and probabilistic collocation method. Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is the most common and straightforward approach for uncertainty quantification. It generates a large number of realizations of the underlying reservoir. Solving the multiple realizations leads to a large computational effort, especially for large-scale problems. We present an accurate and efficient alternative. In this approach, the underlying random fields, such as permeability and porosity are represented by the KL expansion and the resulting random fields (e.g., fluid saturations and pressures) or variables (e.g., hydrocarbon production) are expressed by the polynomial chaos expansions. The probabilistic collocation method (PCM) is used to determine the coefficients of the polynomial chaos expansions by solving for the fluid saturation and pressure fields via the original partial differential equations for selected sets of collocation points. This approach is nonintrusive because it results in independent deterministic differential equations, which, similar to the MC method, can be implemented with existing codes or simulators. However, the required number of simulations in the PCM is much less than that in the MC method. The approach is demonstrated with black-oil problems in heterogeneous reservoirs with the commercial Eclipse simulator. The accuracy, efficiency, and compatibility of this approach are compared against MC simulations. This study reveals that, while its computational efforts are greatly reduced compared to the MC method, the PCM is able to estimate accurately the statistical moments and probability density functions of the fluid saturations (and pressures) and the hydrocarbon production.

[1]  Yuanle Ma,et al.  Computational methods for multiphase flows in porous media , 2007, Math. Comput..

[2]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Media , 1999 .

[3]  Dennis Denney Efficient Closed-Loop Production Optimization Under Uncertainty , 2005 .

[4]  D. Xiu,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in Steady State Diffusion Problems via Generalized Polynomial Chaos , 2002 .

[5]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  An efficient, high-order perturbation approach for flow in random porous media via Karhunen-Loève and polynomial expansions , 2004 .

[6]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[7]  J. Villadsen,et al.  Solution of differential equation models by polynomial approximation , 1978 .

[8]  Menner A. Tatang,et al.  An efficient method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models , 1997 .

[9]  L. Gelhar Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology , 1992 .

[10]  Constantine H. Houpis,et al.  Solution of Differential Equations , 2003 .

[11]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Stochastic Formulation for Uncertainty Assessment of Two-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Reservoirs , 1999 .

[12]  You‐Kuan Zhang Stochastic Methods for Flow in Porous Media: Coping with Uncertainties , 2001 .

[13]  John Killough,et al.  Ninth SPE Comparative Solution Project: A Reexamination of Black-Oil Simulation , 1995 .

[14]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Stochastic Formulation for Uncertainty Analysis of Two-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Reservoirs , 2000 .

[15]  Roger Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Element Analysis for Multiphase Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media , 1998 .

[16]  Roger Ghanem,et al.  Scales of fluctuation and the propagation of uncertainty in random porous media , 1998 .

[17]  John H. Cushman,et al.  The Physics of Fluids in Hierarchical Porous Media: Angstroms to Miles , 1997 .

[18]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Efficient closed-loop production optimization under uncertainty : Reserves/asset management , 2005 .

[19]  N. Wiener The Homogeneous Chaos , 1938 .

[20]  L. Durlofsky,et al.  Kernel Principal Component Analysis for Efficient, Differentiable Parameterization of Multipoint Geostatistics , 2008 .

[21]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Probabilistic collocation method for flow in porous media: Comparisons with other stochastic methods , 2007 .

[22]  S. P. Neuman Subsurface Flow and Transport: Stochastic approach to subsurface flow and transport: a view to the future , 1997 .

[23]  G. Dagan Flow and transport in porous formations , 1989 .

[24]  Y. Rubin Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology , 2003 .

[25]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Stochastic Simulations for Flow in Nonstationary Randomly Heterogeneous Porous Media Using a KL-Based Moment-Equation Approach , 2007, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[26]  Thomas A. Zang,et al.  Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations , 2005, Numerical Algorithms.