Influence of the Main Contact Parameters in Finite Element Analysis of Elastic Bodies in Contact

One of the key issues in solving contact problems is the correct choice of the contact parameters. The contact stiffness, the penetration limit and the contact algorithm are some of the parameters that have to be adjusted. There are no methodologies available in the literature for choosing the contact parameters, relying only on the user experience for this important task. In this work we investigate how the contact parameters behave in a commercial finite element analysis software. We will show that while the contact stiffness has great influence on the finite element analysis, other parameters will not affect it significantly. Some contact examples are shown to illustrate the performance of the contact parameters during the solution of a contact problem.

[1]  Marco Lúcio Bittencourt,et al.  High-order mortar-based element applied to nonlinear analysis of structural contact mechanics , 2015 .

[2]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[3]  M. Puso,et al.  A mortar segment-to-segment contact method for large deformation solid mechanics , 2004 .

[4]  A Strozzi,et al.  Hoop stresses in the con-rod small end , 2005 .

[5]  J. C. Simo,et al.  An augmented lagrangian treatment of contact problems involving friction , 1992 .

[6]  Alberto Luiz Serpa,et al.  Contact with friction using the augmented Lagrangian Method: a conditional constrained minimization problem , 2000 .

[7]  Phillipp Kaestner,et al.  Linear And Nonlinear Programming , 2016 .

[8]  D. Owen,et al.  Computational model for 3‐D contact problems with friction based on the penalty method , 1992 .

[9]  T. K. Hellen.  A frontal solution program for finite element analysis , 1971 .

[10]  Georg Stadler,et al.  Path-following and augmented Lagrangian methods for contact problems in linear elasticity , 2007 .

[11]  Ali Fatemi,et al.  Dynamic analysis of loads and stresses in connecting rods , 2006 .

[12]  J. Arora,et al.  An augmented Lagrangian optimization method for contact analysis problems, 1: formulation and algorithm , 2004 .

[13]  M. Ciavarellaa,et al.  Reduced dependence on loading parameters in almost conforming contacts , 2006 .

[14]  John Dunagan,et al.  Iteratively constructing preconditioners via the conjugate gradient method , 2007, STOC '07.

[15]  Hertz.  On the Contact of Elastic Solids , 1882 .

[16]  T. Laursen.  Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics , 2003 .

[17]  D. Peyrou,et al.  A New Methodology For RF MEMS Contact Simulation , 2008, EuroSimE 2008 - International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Micro-Systems.

[18]  Alberto Luiz Serpa,et al.  Contact stiffness estimation in ANSYS using simplified models and artificial neural networks , 2015 .